NationNational PoliticsPolitics Now

How a Keystone XL loss in the Senate could be a win-win for Democrats

PoliticsElectionsLaws and LegislationU.S. SenateDemocratic PartyRepublican PartyHarry Reid
Senate approval of the Keystone XL pipeline would be a milestone -- if it happens
Why is Harry Reid holding a vote on a bill he really doesn't want to pass?

The long political battle over the Keystone XL pipeline could reach a pivotal moment this week if enough Democratic senators join Republicans to support a bill that would approve the project, all but guaranteeing a veto showdown with the White House.

And that is an outcome Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid would like to avoid.

That's why many were surprised last week when the Nevada Democrat promised to hold a vote on the issue, defying President Obama's intent to delay a decision on the controversial pipeline that Republicans in Congress almost universally support.

Bypassing the White House would open a new rift among Democrats and be a major step in the complicated political history of the nearly 1,200-mile pipeline, which could one day carry crude oil from the tar sands of Canada to a town in Nebraska en route to the Gulf Coast.

So why is Reid holding a vote on a bill he really doesn't want to pass? 

Voting to approve the pipeline would be politically helpful for several conservative-state Democratic senators who are up for re-election this fall, as they try to show voters their independence from the party on the issue.

Eleven Democratic senators, including Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Sen. Mark Begich of Alaska, have signed onto the bill. With a guaranteed 45 Republican votes, the Democratic supporters means the measure is awfully close to the 60 votes required to overcome a filibuster threat.

Passage in the Senate would be a milestone, probably prompting swift approval by Republicans in the House. Several years of what have been bitter partisan fights over the mainstays of energy policy -- fossil fuels versus renewable sources, climate change and its deniers -- would come to a momentary bipartisan truce.

But 60 votes is not the same as almost 60, and that may be what Reid is counting on.

A vote of 59 or 58 this week would be a win-win for Democrats. It would allow pro-pipeline senators to show their constituents they tried, while keeping the peace with anti-pipeline senators and environmentalists.

And it would avoid a showdown with the White House that would force Obama to become the vetoer-in-chief.

Sensing the potential outcome, Senate Republicans may not be willing to play the Democrats' game. They have so far panned Democrats' latest offer for a vote on Keystone, as they press other issues as part of a separate energy efficiency bill making its way through the floor proceedings.

A win on Keystone would be a game-changer for the pipeline. A near-win would be business as usual in the Senate.

 

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
PoliticsElectionsLaws and LegislationU.S. SenateDemocratic PartyRepublican PartyHarry Reid
  • White House intruder arrested after entering front doors
    White House intruder arrested after entering front doors

    An intruder scaled a White House fence and made it all the way into the building Friday evening before he was caught and wrestled to the ground by security officers, the Secret Service said. President Obama and his family had already left for Camp David when the incident occurred.

  • Man who killed daughter and grandchildren had violent past
    Man who killed daughter and grandchildren had violent past

    Don Spirit, a Florida grandfather who fatally shot his daughter Sarah Lorraine Spirit and six grandchildren before killing himself, had a long history of domestic violence — at one point pushing his pregnant daughter against a refrigerator and assaulting and threatening his former...

  • Rain pounds Texas: A sign the drought is ending?
    Rain pounds Texas: A sign the drought is ending?

    In Texas, where the governor once urged the public to pray for rain, this week’s torrential storms might finally be a sign of lasting relief for the state plagued by years of drought. Or maybe not.

  • For many in Congress, a first test on issues of war
    For many in Congress, a first test on issues of war

    Lawmakers' votes this week on whether or not to train and equip Syrian opposition forces in the fight against Islamic State were arguably the most consequential after nearly two years in which Congress is likely to set a new low for productivity.

  • Egyptian militant admits links to 1998 U.S. embassy bombings

    A longtime Egyptian militant with ties to Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden admitted in federal court Friday that he had links to the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Africa, a surprise guilty plea that the judge sharply questioned because it reduces his prison time from a potential life sentence to...

  • Four takeaways from the vote in Congress to arm Syrian rebels
    Four takeaways from the vote in Congress to arm Syrian rebels

    What was supposed to be a no-drama final session of Congress before the campaign season turned into anything but as President Obama's new strategy to combat the threat from Islamic State resulted in a wrenching vote that is likely to reverberate through the midterm election and...

Comments
Loading