Opinion

A vote too late for Obama

At the time, not voting felt right. Now it's time for regrets.
By Norah Vincent
November 11, 2008
» Discuss Article    (218 Comments)

I did not vote this year, and up until a few days ago, I felt good about that decision. But now I wonder if it wasn't a mistake. Or maybe not so much a mistake as something I will come to regret in time. As I've watched the wave of post-election elation rushing over so many people in recent days, and as I have been unexpectedly and powerfully moved myself, I've started to feel a little, I don't know, out of it.

I decided not to vote for what I think are good reasons.

Though I am by no means as doctrinaire as I once was about political and social matters, I'm still a libertarian fiscal conservative. In the most concrete terms, this means I don't believe that penalizing people who make more than $250,000 a year is going to fix the economy.

In fact, I think it may worsen it. The argument goes deeper than that, of course, but no doubt you've heard it before, so I'm not going to bore you with it now. Let's just say that that's the short version of the reason why I didn't vote for Barack Obama.

There are two reasons why I didn't vote for John McCain. The first is that I think he is a man of brittle intellect and doctrinaire sensibility. These are potentially fatal flaws that he shares with the current president, flaws incidentally, that Obama does not share. In fact, Obama's intellectual curiosity and suppleness of mind is, in my view, one of his biggest selling points, whatever your political beliefs.

The second reason I didn't vote for McCain is -- big surprise here -- Sarah Palin. Christopher Hitchens was right on the money when he called her a "proud, boastful ignoramus," though I would go further. She is a belligerent ignoramus. The resounding theme of her candidacy was a shamefully rabble-rousing, nauseatingly populist denunciation of knowledge, intellectual expression and reasoned debate, all apparently the vicious province of the media elite and not the hard and hardy backbone of the "real" America.

Watching her made me sick, and the thought of her ascending to the highest office in the land on the possible demise of her less-than-robust 72-year-old boss was not something I could live with. A vote for him was, in all likelihood, a vote for her, and I just couldn't do it.

But after watching the video of Obama's acceptance speech (I went to bed early Nov. 4), I have, to my great surprise, found myself moved to tears by the president-elect, by his poise and graciousness, not to mention what seems to be his almost Hegelian historical significance. I now wonder if I missed out on the moment. Am I going to feel a little caught out one day when I have to say that I did not vote for him? Or will I feel vindicated by what will surely be the many and great disappointments of the Obama administration?

After all, what man could live up to so much expectation? So much hope?

I honestly don't know how the man gets out of bed in the morning. I mean really, what kind of person goes to work every day thinking, "Yep, just heading off to fix the world." Either a god or a lunatic, it seems to me. Or, and here is my worst worry, a charlatan of the highest order. Because you have to seriously question whether you can really trust someone, anyone, who can manage to get himself elected in a democracy, and moreover someone who can do it while moving you to tears. That man is either P.T. Barnum or Gandhi.

Or not. Maybe he's just an absurdly hopeful person with a lot of energy and belief who can strike the infinitely delicate balance of making the masses happy while sticking to his core beliefs. Maybe he's someone who knows how to tell us what we want to hear while at the same time doing what needs to be done. At this point, it's anybody's guess.

But whatever the case, watching Obama, I can't help myself. I feel proud of us. I think the world is actually proud of us too, and more than a little surprised. It didn't think we had it in us. To tell you the truth, neither did I. We -- well, actually, you -- didn't elect a black man to the presidency. You elected someone who is an incredibly inspiring man, a Kennedyesque, Lincolnesque, Rooseveltesque man, who happens to be black. You elected him not because of or in spite of his race, but without regard to his race, and whether he lives up to even the 100th part of his promise, the electorate has lived up to its, and sitting here now, embarrassedly wiping my eyes, I sort of wish I had been part of it.

Norah Vincent is the author of "Voluntary Madness: My Year Lost and Found in the Loony Bin," forthcoming in December.




Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Comments will close after two days.
 
1. There were more than two presidential candidates. The media empires chose to focus only on two. There are more than two points of view in the USA, and it's terrible that our "winner takes all" system hasn't been improved. All other democracies in the world have several main parties, and they get a lot more done because no one party dominates.
Submitted by: Jesse
4:10 PM PST, Nov 11, 2008
 
2. Your choices weren't limited to Obama or McCain. With your libertarian ideals, you could have cast a vote for Bob Barr, or written in Ron Paul. Instead, your inaction helped perpetuate the media-fed forced-choice fallacy: Republican or Democrat. Considering that both Obama and McCain voted for that ridiculous bailout, the only difference between the two is not one of substance but of style.
Submitted by: JT
4:01 PM PST, Nov 11, 2008
 
3. This was a lovely opinion piece but it drives me nearly crazy. How on earth could you not vote? I waited for 20 years to vote and in late 2006 finally took the oath of citizenship. Voting was, for me, a monumental moment that I shared with my children. You're right to feel wistful about your decision and perhaps your regret will fuel your desire to be a part of the process hereafter. Please vote next time and every time for whomever you think will best lead us. Voting is the bit that makes this whole thing work!
Submitted by: Christopher Dael
3:59 PM PST, Nov 11, 2008
 




Jonah Goldberg: Citing recently published comments, the columnist wonders whether the justice believes some populations need to be reduced through abortion.


   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
In today's pages: Reform for all!
In today's pages: reform. Reform of the health care system, reform of...
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
Appiphilia: Remixing with Romplr
For all the hype about the "remix culture," I'm skeptical of the notion that the...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT