Los Angeles Times
 
 
 
 
 
Bradley Effect

The 'Bradley effect' myth

Has racism skewed the poll results in the McCain-Obama race, as it supposedly did in 1982? Not likely.
November 4, 2008

» Discuss Article    (56 Comments)

Much has been said and written in recent weeks about the so-called Bradley effect, the supposed phenomenon of white voters who secretly harbor racist animosity toward black candidates but who are too embarrassed to admit that to pollsters and thus lie about whom they intend to support. The effect is said to have lulled then-Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley into complacency in his 1982 run for governor of California, and to have produced misleading poll results that suggested Bradley would win. Instead, he lost by 1 percentage point, about 100,000 votes.

There is no doubt that racism lingers in American politics, but much more has been made of the Bradley effect than is justified -- take it from us, we were here the night it was born. In fact, the lessons of the Bradley campaign against George Deukmejian have far less to do with the viability of black candidates than they do with the limits of polling.

In that campaign, Bradley supporters begged gun-control advocates not to place a restrictive gun measure on the same ballot as the governor's race, but their pleadings were ignored. The gun measure drew large numbers of first-time voters, many from the interior of the state, who went to the polls specifically to protect their guns and, while there, rejected Bradley as well. Because so many were novice voters, they were underrepresented in preelection polls that highlighted "likely voters," a generally sound approach but one that missed the gun surge in 1982. They also were not picked up by exit polls because many distrusted pollsters and refused to answer their questions.

That election also was one of the first in California to feature a large absentee vote, commonplace today but relatively novel then. With so many ballots mailed in, particularly from conservative areas, the exit polls were sidestepped and the results skewed.

Regarding today's election, there are two more reasons to doubt whether the Bradley effect, if it exists, will play much of a role. First, those who oppose Barack Obama because of his race can certainly find other ways to dress that up for a pollster. There are, after all, ample reasons to support John McCain, whether because of his experience -- or Obama's lack thereof -- or his positions on issues from Iraq to taxes. Voters' inclinations thus should be captured accurately, even if their motivations might not be. Second, this election may feature a jump in the number of younger voters who cast ballots. They appear to tilt heavily toward Obama and are more likely to rely on cellphones, which pollsters have yet to figure out how to contact. Thus any racists who conceal themselves from pollsters may be counterbalanced by voters who are simply unavailable to them.

Polls can be wrong. Those that show Obama ahead as election day opens could be as misleading as the 2004 predictions that John Kerry was the likely winner. If McCain wins, it won't likely be proof of the Bradley effect, which demonstrated not so much that respondents lie to pollsters as that pollsters can't know what they don't know to look for.




Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
  
Discussion

Comments will close at the end of the day.
 
1. I am so sick of hearing ignorant people say "blacks are more racist than whites", that "they are no longer treated unfairly". !!! What? Open your eyes to the criminal, immoral treatment of African Americans to this day, entrenched in 400 years of whips and lynchings and fire hoses. Its been little over 50 years since desegregation. Pretending the problems of race in American disspear like dust in the wind is preposterous. Its blindness
Submitted by: ahhhhhh
4:09 PM PST, Nov 4, 2008
 
2. If nothing else, these comments show the failure of our educational system. There isn't a comment here without a misspelling or grammatical error. Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus - and plenty of white Americans AND African-Americans as well.But, as a middle-age, middle-class, white American woman trying to support a family, I don't need more Republican party dishonest election tactics, shocking sell-out of our business infrastructure, dedication to destruction of our environment, and willingness to embrace the most ridiculous and antiquated concepts to appease ultra-right wing religious fanatics.
Submitted by: CLW
3:38 PM PST, Nov 4, 2008
 
3. Race is still a big factor in this campaign. There have been tons of articles where whites have said that they are not voting for Obama because he is black. There are also many Black people who are voting for Obama because he is black. The fact that he is black doesn't make a difference to me. Its a plus, but not a deciding factor. I am a black person and the reasons I voted for Obama go beyond his race. He is just the better choice. The race card will always be played. It is just something that we have to deal with and hope that ignorance won't take over the decision to elect who is best for this country.
Submitted by: Erica
3:36 PM PST, Nov 4, 2008
 
Read all 56 comments




LM Pagano's house has a timeworn elegance that feels more like New Orleans than Los Angeles. Photos
He is America's premier authority on travel. Now 80, he still can't slow down.
The L.A. Police Chief's four bedroom home is on the market at $1,875,000. Photos
If fashion makes the man, we don't know what kind of man that makes Sasha Baron Cohen's Bruno. Photos | Review
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT

National Headlines