Opinion
Reading Los Angeles: Join The Times' new book club
Opinion Opinion L.A.
Opinion

Lilly Ledbetter wasn't lazy; she -- and all women -- just want equal pay

Regardless of Opinion L.A. guest blogger Charlotte Allen's ridiculously inflammatory contention that "Despite its cute graphic, Paycheck Fairness Act was evil spawn of Lilly Ledbetter," the facts remain discouraging for women when it comes to equal pay.

According to data from the U.S. Census Bureau, women in America earn 77 cents for every dollar a man makes. Women of color earn even less: For African American women, the figure is 69 cents, and for Latino women, it's 58 cents. In 2012, the median income of American women working full time year-round was $37,791; for men, it was nearly $50,000. 

This year will be the worst for income disparity in U.S. history, likely only to be bested by 2015. This comes at a bad time: Increasingly, low- to moderate-income families in America must rely on women's income and benefits to make ends meet.

ABOUT BLOWBACK: FAQs and submission policy

Wage disparity -- which exists in every state and in nearly every occupation -- is, in the end, not a women's rights issue but a family issue. Nevertheless, this month, the Paycheck Fairness Act died, almost exclusively because of Republican politicians -- many of them conservatives who campaigned and won on platforms that included strong family values.

Those conservatives had pundits like Allen to provide a faulty intellectual foundation. The following statement by her was a particularly egregious one that belies a total misunderstanding of Lilly Ledbetter and the legislation bearing her name: "The Lilly Ledbetter Act added nothing to the right of women to be paid on an equal basis with men. It merely gave women who were too lazy to sue promptly -- or who wanted to wait until they had retired to sue -- a second shot."

I spent two years of my life with Ledbetter coauthoring her autobiography. Call her what you may, but one thing you can't imply about her is that she's lazy.

Formerly a supervisor with the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Ledbetter was awarded $3.8 million by a federal jury in 2003 after suing her employer for pay discrimination. That amount was reduced by law to $360,000 in back pay and benefits. Clearly, a jury of her peers did not view Ledbetter as someone who was too lazy to sue or who waited to sue until her retirement. Draining her small savings to subsidize her legal battle, and maintaining her courage and conviction over the course of a decade, does not smack of a conniving woman's get-rich-quick scheming.

As far as the 2009 Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Restoration Act is concerned, the keyword here is "restoration." The legislation restored the paycheck accrual rule under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to its original intent, defining the starting point for discriminatory behavior as the last discriminatory paycheck. In other words, each new paycheck is a new starting point for the discriminatory act, which allows women the ability to pursue their equal pay claims even if they were prevented from learning about pay discrimination until long after the original discriminatory pay decision was made.

Trickery and manipulation can only flourish in environments where full disclosure about what people are making doesn't exist. That's what the executive order President Obama signed two weeks ago seeks to accomplish by banning federal contractors from retaliating against workers who discuss their salaries.

Who's to blame for the failure of the Paycheck Fairness Act to pass? Regardless of the administration's silly retro graphic or Allen's conspiracy theory that Ledbetter and the legislation are pawns of Obama's campaign machine, the answer is fairly simple: The act died thanks to those who voted against it and the politically charged rhetoric (like Allen's "evil spawn" invective) that drowned out a more civil discourse about the wage gap.

Unfortunately, the 23-cent wage gap has remained intact over the years, a troubling fact for a modern economy in which more women are entering the workforce and families increasingly depend on women's wages to survive. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, women make up 47% of the workforce and are projected to account for 51% of the increase in total labor force growth between 2008 and 2018. Also, 4 in 10 American households with children under age 18 now include a mother who is either the sole or primary breadwinner for her family, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of census and polling data released last year.

Lilly Ledbetter is not Obama's poster child to secure the female vote; far from it. She is a real person who overcame unimaginable obstacles in the workplace. A tireless advocate for pay equity, Lilly Ledbetter is a woman who continues to work toward the passage of the Paycheck Fairness Act -- and for the day when women are no longer kept silent about their true worth.

ALSO:

Affirmative action banned? It's not that simple.

USC shooter's 40-year prison sentence: Don't call it justice

Climbing Everest shouldn't just be an item on someone's bucket list

Lanier Isom is the coauthor, with Lilly Ledbetter, of "Grace and Grit: How I Won My Fight for Fairness at Goodyear and Beyond."

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Why women are leaving the tech industry in droves
    Why women are leaving the tech industry in droves

    When I moved to the Bay Area in 2007 to run the Wikimedia Foundation, the first thing that struck me was the eerie absence of women. I'd spent most of my working life at the Canadian Broadcasting Corp., where we used to joke that women took power when the men went off to war in 1939, and afterward...

  • On Roe vs. Wade's birthday, an unscientific attempt to limit abortion rights
    On Roe vs. Wade's birthday, an unscientific attempt to limit abortion rights

    On Thursday, the 42nd anniversary of the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Roe vs. Wade, the House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on a bill to ban abortions at 20 weeks. The bill is expected to pass the House and may pass the Senate as well, although it is almost certain to be vetoed...

  • Pope Francis' woman problem
    Pope Francis' woman problem

    At first, it was easy to overlook. With all of his statements about caring for the poor, the disabled and immigrants, and all the fanfare surrounding his famous “Who am I to judge?” proclamation, Pope Francis seemed like a breath of fresh air for a church stuck resolutely in the past. The fact...

  • My feminist icon isn't Beyonce, it's a bruised-up backpacker
    My feminist icon isn't Beyonce, it's a bruised-up backpacker

    It wasn’t long ago that feminists were ostracized activists viewed as nothing more than man haters. But thanks to years of work and the recognition from a few key figures, pop culture has finally embraced the notion of gender equality.

  • Mike Huckabee's misguided 'war on Beyonce'
    Mike Huckabee's misguided 'war on Beyonce'

    Does Mike Huckabee know how to deliver a backhanded compliment or what? In his book, “God, Guns, Grits and Gravy,” the former Arkansas governor and Fox News talk show host compliments Beyonce and then knocks her down with sexist nonsense. Media outlets are calling it the "war on Beyonce."

  • Forget the 'mommy wars.' We've got the war on moms to deal with
    Forget the 'mommy wars.' We've got the war on moms to deal with

    America, we have a mommy problem.

  • Women rocked the Golden Globes
    Women rocked the Golden Globes

    You have to admit that there’s some encouraging evidence that women on the screen (and behind it) in Hollywood are slowing but surely having more impact. Just look at the Golden Globes Sunday night: the variety of interesting women's roles that won; the fact that two big winning shows were created...

  • In the Obamacare birth-control debate, there's a logical path
    In the Obamacare birth-control debate, there's a logical path

    In case you haven't encountered enough illogic in the American healthcare system, consider this: Once a medication has been determined to be safe and effective enough to be available without a prescription, we assume it should no longer be covered by insurance. That doesn't follow, and contraceptives...

Comments
Loading