Reading Los Angeles: Join The Times' new book club
Opinion Readers React
Readers React

The shoddy science behind developers' push to delist the California gnatcatcher

To the editor: The idea to delist the California gnatcatcher, pushed by developers, is based on second-rate science. ("Developers seek end to federal protections for California gnatcatcher," June 29)

I was a reviewer for the developer-funded paper saying the California bird is not a distinct population when it was originally submitted to another journal. As a biologist who studies bird genetics and taxonomy, I can attest to the fact that the study did not use modern methods.

In my review, I was critical of the genetic markers and environmental characteristics the authors chose to assess whether the gnatcatchers were different from other populations. Their choices made it a foregone conclusion that the authors would find no evidence for distinctiveness. Instead of addressing my criticism, they apparently chose to resubmit their study to another journal in hopes of finding more sympathetic reviewers.

There are modern genetic and ecological techniques that could provide the final word on the controversy, if only there were time and money to carry them out.

John McCormack, Los Angeles

The writer, an assistant professor of biology at Occidental College, is director of the school's Moore Laboratory of Zoology.


To the editor: It's not really about the DNA in a little gnatcatcher, is it? As usual, it's all about developers and builders hoping to line their pockets at the expense of our beautiful planet — in this case, bulldozing many of the 197,000 protected acres of coastal land so human beings can live in homes with a view of the sea.

My husband, son and I moved to Southern California last summer and discovered the Palos Verdes Peninsula just recently. It's the prettiest place we've seen since moving here.

We hope the environmental groups can save it.

Alison Rood, Long Beach

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Holding Iran to a nuclear deal may be a challenge

    To the editor: Michael Krepon may well be correct that the Iran nuclear deal in the works serves U.S. interests, but his endorsement exposes a chink that cannot be ignored — namely the challenge to hold Iran to the deal. ("The Obama administration is seeking the right deal with Iran,"...

  • A native Californian and proud of it

    To the editor: When I see weather reports of the frozen tundra that has become the East Coast, with snow piled up high, I gaze at the sky and thank my wonderful father for moving to Los Angeles in 1950 to escape his Baltimore hay fever in the summer and freezing toes in the winter. ("Despite...

  • Leonard Nimoy: a star yet down to Earth

    To the editor: Leonard Nimoy and I were seatmates on a flight from Los Angeles to San Antonio in the late 1960s. ("Not just Spock: Leonard Nimoy's arts trek covered many galaxies," Feb. 27)

  • AEG plays the terrorism card to boost its NFL bid
    AEG plays the terrorism card to boost its NFL bid

    To the editor: It is shocking that sports and entertainment firm AEG, in its lust for an NFL team, would hire Tom Ridge, a former Homeland Security secretary, to play the terrorism card. ("AEG report warns rival Inglewood NFL stadium presents terrorist threat," Feb. 27)

  • California GOP needs the Log Cabin Republicans

    To the editor: Congratulations to the Log Cabin Republicans' California chapter for finally being recognized by the state GOP. Still, I wouldn't get too comfortable under that big tent — Republicans being only 28% of the electorate might have a lot to do with the "why?" after all these...

  • Unlawful dumping isn't just a problem with the homeless

    To the editor: I thank The Times for opposing this ill-considered measure by the city of Los Angeles to allow homeless people's belongings to be seized after 24 hours. ("Council proposal to declutter L.A. should be rejected," editorial, Feb. 26)