OpinionReaders React
Readers React

The shoddy science behind developers' push to delist the California gnatcatcher

BiologyEnvironmental PoliticsEnvironmental IssuesEndangered Species

To the editor: The idea to delist the California gnatcatcher, pushed by developers, is based on second-rate science. ("Developers seek end to federal protections for California gnatcatcher," June 29)

I was a reviewer for the developer-funded paper saying the California bird is not a distinct population when it was originally submitted to another journal. As a biologist who studies bird genetics and taxonomy, I can attest to the fact that the study did not use modern methods.

In my review, I was critical of the genetic markers and environmental characteristics the authors chose to assess whether the gnatcatchers were different from other populations. Their choices made it a foregone conclusion that the authors would find no evidence for distinctiveness. Instead of addressing my criticism, they apparently chose to resubmit their study to another journal in hopes of finding more sympathetic reviewers.

There are modern genetic and ecological techniques that could provide the final word on the controversy, if only there were time and money to carry them out.

John McCormack, Los Angeles

The writer, an assistant professor of biology at Occidental College, is director of the school's Moore Laboratory of Zoology.


To the editor: It's not really about the DNA in a little gnatcatcher, is it? As usual, it's all about developers and builders hoping to line their pockets at the expense of our beautiful planet — in this case, bulldozing many of the 197,000 protected acres of coastal land so human beings can live in homes with a view of the sea.

My husband, son and I moved to Southern California last summer and discovered the Palos Verdes Peninsula just recently. It's the prettiest place we've seen since moving here.

We hope the environmental groups can save it.

Alison Rood, Long Beach

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
BiologyEnvironmental PoliticsEnvironmental IssuesEndangered Species
  • U.S. military action isn't always the answer

    To the editor: Max Boot's prescription for salvaging U.S. foreign policy fails to recognize the need for a nuanced analysis of the possible consequences of unilateral military intervention. ("Chuck Hagel's firing won't help U.S. foreign policy," Op-Ed, Nov. 24)

  • Don't delay, deal with Iran

    To the editor: Iran has had more than a year to make concessions on its nuclear program, and yet Sven-Eric Fikenscher approves of the extension of talks. In the meantime, Iran has refused to cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency in disclosing some "highly suspicious activities...

  • History classes don't need to be 'gamified'

    To the editor: The article describing some students at Venice High School playing games to access world history saddens those who believe history need not be "gamified," put online to download and reduced in scope to stimulate thought and engagement in classrooms. ("L.A. Unified adopts free...

  • Why no mention of Roybal as a presidential honoree?

    To the editor: Much to my dismay, the article omitted mention of Edward Roybal as one of the 18 people awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Obama on Monday. ("Medal of Freedom awarded to Meryl Streep, Stevie Wonder, others," Nov. 24)

  • Warm thoughts of Rabbi Beerman

    To the editor: The article on Rabbi Leonard Beerman brought back wonderful memories of growing up at Leo Baeck Temple in the 1960s and '70s. It bears noting that Rabbi Beerman's political activism was coupled with pastoral dedication. ("At 93, Rabbi Leonard Beerman still stirs passions with...

  • Laying blame for California's affirmative consent law

    To the editor: Ah, spring, when a young man's fancy turns to thoughts of … affirmative consent, role-playing exercises and modeling strategies as precursors to intimacy. Let's thank party girls short on common sense, the Neanderthal creeps who take advantage and the bureaucrats who...