Reading Los Angeles: Join The Times' new book club
Opinion Readers React
Readers React

The bullet train is still a bad idea

To the editor: So now California's high-speed rail system will be a super Metrolink, shuttling people between Burbank and Palmdale in a few minutes. You can dress it up, but it is still a bad idea. ("Burbank-Palmdale segment added to bullet train timetable," June 30)

Spending tens of billions of dollars to provide subsidized transportation to a very small percentage of Californians while we are an earthquake away from the collapse of the state's water system is insane. How about using the $250 million a year to put solar power on houses, businesses and parking lots? That would realize the goals of California's cap-and-trade system in a cost-effective and timely way.

High-speed rail and L.A.'s new transit lines are 20th century technologies but are not cost-effective 21st century transportation systems.

Can we do better? Or is the solution just over officials' heads?

Murry I. Rozansky, Chatsworth


To the editor: Just like everything else having to do with the bullet train, I expect the projection of 14 to 16 minutes to get from Burbank to Palmdale to be wildly optimistic.

According to Google, it's about 55 miles between the two cities. That would mean that the train would have to go from zero to about 200 mph instantly and then back to zero by stopping on a dime, as it would take traveling at that speed the entire distance to make the trip in the stated time.

Or, are officials planning on burrowing straight through the mountains?

This is more insane wasting of taxpayer money.

Joe Sykora, Woodland Hills

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Bruce Jenner's very public transition

    To the editor: It's encouraging to read that Bruce Jenner's widely watched interview Friday night may raise national awareness and acceptance of transgender persons. ("Transgender community, allies see Jenner interview in positive light," April 25)

  • Do drones make it too easy to wage war?

    To the editor: It is appropriate that the government and the media revive the drone debate. There have been many unintended casualties from drone attacks, and these are always shocking. ("U.S. must explain necessity of drone strikes," editorial, April 24)

  • UCLA is right to welcome Cornel West

    To the editor: I am a supporter of Israel — of its survival and social development. A dear member of my family gave generously to Technion (Israel's MIT) for just those reasons. ("Some Jewish activists don't want Cornel West at UCLA conference," April 24)

  • Could manmade quakes come to frack-friendly California?
    Could manmade quakes come to frack-friendly California?

    To the editor: As scientists map oil industry-triggered earthquakes in other states, California regulators are ignoring risky activity by oil companies. Underground injection of fracking flow-back and other oil wastewater can trigger damaging quakes, research shows — and oil companies in California...

  • Scientology deserves its tax exemption

    To the editor: Alex Gibney appears trapped in his own prison of bias when he wrongly asserts that the Church of Scientology did not deserve IRS recognition of its tax-exempt status in 1993. The truth is the Church underwent the most exhaustive IRS scrutiny of any applicant in history to be recognized....

  • Polls of anti-gun researchers don't indicate scientific consensus

    To the editor: Harvard public health Professor David Hemenway's research is a prime example of a scientific determination by a show of hands. ("There's scientific consensus on guns -- and the NRA won't like it," op-ed, April 22)