Get Opinion in your inbox -- sign up for our weekly newsletter
Opinion Readers React
Readers React

High-speed rail: An opportunity to make L.A. transit more seamless

To the editor: The California High-Speed Rail Authority has at last shown some common sense in expediting construction of the Burbank-Palmdale segment. On a project of this size and scope, it was always crucial to prioritize building segments that could provide useful transportation on their own while the rest of the system gets built. ("Building L.A. County segment would accelerate bullet train project," Editorial, July 6)

Now Metro and the Orange County Transportation Authority can exploit that by electrifying and upgrading existing tracks to give us "Electrolink" from south Orange County to Palmdale via L.A.'s Union Station. This will take advantage of the new run-through tracks at Union Station and give passengers a one-seat ride between multiple stations.

Equally important, this will reduce the number of diesel trains operating in the region. Even new, "clean" diesels emit pollutants and burn fossil fuels.

Now is the time to provide high-quality public transportation, not just for local journeys by subway and light rail but also longer regional trips.

Paul Dyson, Burbank

The writer is president of the Rail Passenger Assn. of California and Nevada and chairman of the Burbank Transportation Commission.


To the editor: California would certainly benefit from having a passenger rail system that connected its major population centers. It does not necessarily need to be high speed, but it should be reasonably swift, safe, comfortable, clean, frequent, direct, reliable, cost-effective to build and affordable to ride without major subsidy.

Unfortunately, the politically engineered rail authority's project cannot achieve all of those objectives.

Sadly, we now watch The Times again rise to support this folly because local pork is disingenuously dangled for proposed early construction of a Palmdale-Burbank segment. This underscores the greater problem: blinkered provincial economic self-interest actually driving this program.

State lawmakers should beware of how a majority of their constituents will view their misallocation of precious cap-and-trade money in support of this abomination — one that ultimately cannot fail to fail.

Robert I. Schwartz, Thousand Oaks


To the editor: The bullet train that was originally conceived to take many of the roughly 6 million people annually flying between the Bay Area and Southern California out of the sky has become the latest commuter rail to the Antelope Valley.

California high-speed rail is becoming a bigger boondoggle than Boston's Big Dig, which spent about $15 billion putting a little more than three miles of elevated road underground.

The airlines and the freight railroads could be a major player in high-speed rail. Electrified rail would save on fuel costs and over the long term serve the growing intrastate market far more efficiently than air travel.

But a direct line from L.A. to the Bay Area, following the Interstate 5 corridor, is needed. This would have far less impact on private land, would be cost-efficient to attract private investment and, at less than three-hour travel times, would meet the expectations of voters who approved this project in 2008.

Dennis Arntz, Laguna Niguel

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Building L.A. County segment would accelerate bullet train project

    Building L.A. County segment would accelerate bullet train project

    The "train to nowhere" is beginning to look a bit more like a train to somewhere. Flush with $250 million this year and the promise of billions more from the state's cap-and-trade program, the California High Speed Rail Authority has proposed accelerating plans to build the segment of the bullet...

  • Obama and the "N-word': Language and society evolve

    Obama and the "N-word': Language and society evolve

    To the editor: The Op-Ed by Madison T. Shockley II ( “Obama said it, and why that's OK,” Opinion, June 28) on the “N-word” and who can use it reflects the continuing evolution of language. For example, as a World War II-era kid, I never saw the “F-word” in print, as it was mostly used to describe...

  • What to do about death row

    What to do about death row

    To the edtior: In a curious decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, (“Despite vote, shift is felt on death penalty,” June 30) the justices should be charged with practicing medicine without a license.

  • Charleston shooting: fighting over the flag

    Charleston shooting: fighting over the flag

    To the editor: Columnist George Skelton made a mistake by unjustly comparing the ethnic pride many Latinos possess when they see the Mexican flag to the waving of the Confederate flag at legislative buildings in the South. (“Flags depict a false image,” Column, June 25)

  • YouTube: your content, their profits

    YouTube: your content, their profits

    To the editor: During the Napster era, content populists gleefully scorned labels and publishers for their short-sightedness: If large media concerns continued to insist on payment for their property instead of embracing file-sharing as an opportunity, they'd get what they deserved. Sure enough,...

  • A clash of currency

    A clash of currency

    To the editor: I really must agree with former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and his opinion that the excellent Alexander Hamilton should remain on the $10 bill. (“New face for $10 bill stirs backlash,” June 27)

  • So, L.A., what's your sign?

    So, L.A., what's your sign?

    To the editor: I applaud the debate (“How not to regulate signs in L.A.,” Editorial, June 29) on what to do about the many large commercial signs within our city; I support our city attorney in removing the many unauthorized or illegal signs at the expense of the businesses that posted them, plus...

  • Despite Scalia, California counts

    Despite Scalia, California counts

    To the editor: The portrayal of Justice Antonin Scalia's language as set forth by columnist Steve Lopez ( “Scalia discovers we are 10th circle of hell,” Column, June 27) seemed unbelievable, so I read the dissent on the Supreme Court website.