The Los Angeles Times endorsements in the March 3 election
Opinion Readers React
Readers React

No to military equipment for cops, yes to cameras in patrol cars

To the editor: Saturday's front page included an article about the increased militarization of U.S. police departments alongside the one about the inability of the Los Angeles Police Department to install cameras in all patrol cars. ("LAPD's in-car camera effort is lagging," Aug. 15)

Billions of dollars' worth of military weaponry, including assault rifles and armored vehicles, is donated by the Pentagon to any police department that can pick up the equipment; yet some departments can't afford the relatively few millions it would cost to put video cameras in their vehicles.

What is wrong with our military budget when we can afford to give away usable weapons and equipment? Why can't the Pentagon order fewer vehicles and guns so the federal grants that would fund patrol car cameras could be more substantial?

The accountability for both police and civilian behavior provided by the patrol car cameras might help alleviate the need for the militaristic policing of our communities.

Susan Talbot, Los Angeles


To the editor: Is a person who is attempting to take an officer's gun from him by force a threat to the officer such that deadly force in response is justified? For most people, this is a rhetorical question. ("Ferguson, Mo., and L.A.: Two police shootings, one common thread," Editorial, Aug. 14)

Initial reports on the shooting of Ezell Ford by Los Angeles Police Department officers contend that Ford was trying to take the officer's gun. It's bewildering that The Times contends those facts are simply an officer shooting an "unarmed man." It's also worth noting that there is no constitutional right to resist a lawful arrest.

Per department policy and law, deadly force can be used to stop a threat to an officer's life. So, let me answer The Times' apparently non-rhetorical question:

"When a person attempts to take an officer's gun from them, no matter their physical or mental condition, we should expect an officer to respond accordingly to save his or her own life — and that likely includes the use of deadly force."

Tyler Izen, Granada Hills

The writer is president of the Los Angeles Police Protective League.


To the editor: Clearly our mental health system is broken when law enforcement is the first responder to mentally challenged people.

It is vital for law enforcement at all levels to be properly trained to interact with the mentally ill in a way that is both safe and effective. These interactions are inevitable and should not result in injury or death to either party.

The recent incidents filling the news these days where mentally ill people have been beaten or killed should not be accepted as unavoidable. Law enforcement is there to protect and serve everyone, even irrational and troubled individuals.

Please think of these troubled individuals as someone's loved one — a parent, a child, a human being. Surely there is a way to deal with these situations without it escalating to extreme harm or death.

Denise Frey, Santa Barbara

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Head scarf case could open a Pandora's box on religion

    To the editor: Compelling employers to abide their workers' wearing of religious head wear would open courts to all kinds of religion-based lawsuits. ("Supreme Court seems set to side with Muslim woman in head scarf case," Feb. 25)

  • Getty Trust chief: Islamic State attack on Iraq museum 'heartbreaking'

    To the editor: The tragic destruction of antiquities at the museum in Mosul, Iraq, demands our outrage. As civilized people, we can't allow the destruction of the world's cultural heritage by a small group of fanatics. ("Islamic State says it destroyed ancient artifacts in Mosul, Iraq," Feb....

  • Disenchanted California Republicans can become Democrats

    To the editor: I found it highly astonishing that, given the tone in which Brian O'Leary Bennett wrote his op-ed article on modernizing the state GOP, he has been a conservative Republican Party activist for nearly 40 years. ("California Republicans -- evolve or die," op-ed, Feb. 25)

  • Try charging a dime for plastic bags

    To the editor: I am one of the few people who recycled plastic bags when I was not given the choice of paper bags and one of the many thousands whose signatures resulted in a measure to reverse the preposterous charge for using paper bags. ("Californians must show their resolve on plastic-bag...

  • Jerry Brown must enforce California's environmental laws

    To the editor: I am floored. Article after article in The Times and other news outlets in the state keep exposing ways that the oil industry is cutting corners and putting our health and our water — particularly in the Central Valley — at risk. ("Hundreds of illicit oil wastewater...

  • You won't have Villaraigosa to kick around anymore
    You won't have Villaraigosa to kick around anymore

    Before Antonio Villaraigosa announced this week that he would not run for California's open U.S. Senate seat in 2016, some were framing a contest between the ex-Los Angeles mayor and state Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris, previously San Francisco's district attorney, as another episode in the...