OpinionTop of the Ticket

Christopher Dorner saga collides with State of the Union speech

ElectionsPersonal Weapon ControlPoliticsInterior PolicyGun ControlBarack ObamaChristopher Dorner

What appears to be the fiery finale to Christopher Dorner's violent rampage across Southern California nearly upstaged President Obama's State of the Union address. As the seconds ticked down to the start of the speech, it seemed as though Anderson Cooper and the folks at CNN were awfully reluctant to break away from the burning cabin near Big Bear where the disgruntled, unhinged ex-cop from the Los Angeles Police Department appeared to be holed up. 

Nevertheless, the cable news organizations did their duty and switched from the sensational to the substantial. They were rewarded with an unusually news-making speech from Obama. As police officials appeared close to confirming that the deadly Dorner saga had ended, the president was confirming that he is just getting started on an aggressive agenda for the coming year. He said he intends to take action on climate change, gun control, immigration, infrastructure repair, the minimum wage, early childhood education and ending the war in Afghanistan.

The most dramatic moment in the address came near the end when Obama, pushing his firearms safety legislation, cited the multiple victims of gun violence in the audience and to rising applause -- significantly, not from Republicans -- repeated, over and over, "They deserve a vote!"

If that rhetorical flourish had the feel of a political convention, the Republican response from Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, as well as the tea party rejoinder delivered by Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, smelled like stale leftovers from the 2012 campaign trail. Much of Rubio's speech was a personal slap at Obama. The rest was a boilerplate slam of "big government," even as Rubio oddly cited government programs that had helped him achieve success, as well as the Medicare coverage that had made life easier for his parents.

Tuesday was a big night for news. One story was like a action-packed cop show straight from Hollywood, the other was a bit like a political melodrama we have seen many times before. Still, the president gave a good performance and earned whatever audience he was able to grab from the police showdown in the Southern California woods.

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
ElectionsPersonal Weapon ControlPoliticsInterior PolicyGun ControlBarack ObamaChristopher Dorner
  • Postal Service dying from 1,000 cuts and a GOP stab in the back
    Postal Service dying from 1,000 cuts and a GOP stab in the back

    As AOL used to say, “You’ve got mail!” But maybe not on Saturdays if the mail you are looking for is being delivered by the much-maligned “snail mail” of the United States Postal Service.

  • Short of voters, Republicans gerrymander their way back to power
    Short of voters, Republicans gerrymander their way back to power

    Republicans have become a devious party that believes if you cannot win by following fair rules, there is nothing wrong with rigging the game. To their constitutionally endorsed advantage in the Senate, they have added a manipulated advantage in the House of Representatives that some...

  • Is Obama a modern-day Quintus Fabius Maximus?
    Is Obama a modern-day Quintus Fabius Maximus?

    President Obama has been repeatedly accused of delay. Critics say he dragged his feet on sending more troops to Afghanistan, on addressing the dangers in Libya, on providing support to Syria's rebels and, most recently, on initiating military action against Islamic State.

  • Shame on Texas and the U.S. Supreme Court
    Shame on Texas and the U.S. Supreme Court

    In allowing Texas' voter identification law to go into effect, at least for the November election, the U.S. Supreme Court last week showed the nation precisely what it meant in 2013 when its conservatives struck down the heart of the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County vs. Holder.

  • To freeze or not to freeze -- your eggs

    Here are three things you can always count on: death, taxes and that anything related to motherhood or women's reproductive choices will stir up enough cultural debate to make everyone forget about death and taxes for a news cycle or two.

  • Endorsement video: Why you should vote no on Prop. 46
    Endorsement video: Why you should vote no on Prop. 46

    Proposition 46 is the pupu platter of ballot measures, proposing major changes in three laws related to patient safety. One provision would more than quadruple the cap on “pain and suffering” awards in medical malpractice cases, raising it from $250,000 to $1.1 million. A second...

Comments
Loading