Introduced on Behalf of Supervisors Who Serve on Commissions : Bill Would Weaken Conflict-of-Interest Law

A tough conflict-of-interest law that has been at the center of a land-use dispute between the City of Agoura Hills and Los Angeles County would be weakened by legislation introduced by Assemblyman John R. Lewis (R-Orange).

The bill would exclude elected officials who sit on any of the state’s 57 local agency formation commissions from having to disqualify themselves from voting on certain matters. Currently, they cannot vote on issues that could benefit anyone from whom they have received a campaign contribution of $250 or more in the last year.

The bill was introduced on behalf of Los Angeles County Supervisors Mike Antonovich and Pete Schabarum and the Orange County Board of Supervisors.

Lewis said the commissions, formed about 20 years ago to decide cityhood issues, annexations and boundary disputes, have been hampered by the law because some elected officials have refused to fulfill their duties on commissions “out of fear of inadvertently voting on something” that would affect a campaign contributor.

Los Angeles County officials have attempted to change the law since last summer, prompted by the dispute between Agoura Hills and the county commission, known as LAFCO.

1985 Decision

At issue was the commission’s decision in early 1985 to limit the city’s sphere of influence for planning purposes essentially to its current boundaries.

The city sought a larger planning area and challenged the ruling in court, charging that Los Angeles Councilman Hal Bernson and Supervisor Antonovich--both members of LAFCO--violated the law by participating in commission action after receiving campaign contributions from landowners affected by the decision.

In December, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Irving A. Shimer set aside the commission action because of the participation of the elected officials. The commission Wednesday voted 4 to 0 to reaffirm the ruling that restricted Agoura Hills’ sphere--which reflects the city’s “probable ultimate physical boundaries”--to its existing eight square miles.

The commission consists of seven members, including three who represent the San Fernando Valley--Antonovich, Bernson and Bert Boeckmann, owner of Galpin Ford, who holds a seat designated for the valley under state law.

The other members are Schabarum, West Covina Councilman Ken Chappell, Huntington Park Councilman Tom Jackson and public member Henri Pellissier, a Whittier businessman.

‘Would Resist Changes’

Assemblywoman Maxine Waters (D-Los Angeles), author of the 2-year-old law, which was sponsored by the state Fair Political Practices Commission, said she would resist any changes “unless I hear that it’s impossible to administer.”

John Keplinger, executive director of the Fair Political Practices Commission, said he plans to recommend that the watchdog agency oppose the Lewis bill because “we don’t believe the law is difficult to apply. It’s not that complicated.”

The law imposes a much more restrictive standard on elected officials who sit on these commissions than they are required to meet on city councils and boards of supervisors.

“It’s the only state law that I’m aware of that puts any limitation on campaign contributions,” said Kathryn E. Donovan, a lawyer with the Fair Political Practices Commission.

Elected officials did not begin to realize until last summer that the law could restrict their votes on some issues, such as annexations, when they sit on local agency formation commissions.

Los Angeles County lobbyists in Sacramento last summer attempted to amend a bill to exclude local agency formation commissions from the law. They ran out of time as the Legislature rushed to complete its session.

Increasingly Uneasy

As the controversy over the law has mounted, commissioners in Los Angeles and elsewhere have grown increasingly uneasy about voting on issues on which they might have a conflict.

For example, in early January, Antonovich and Schabarum disqualified themselves because of the potential of a conflict when the commission voted 4 to 0 to annex Summa Corp.’s 803-acre Playa Vista development to the City of Los Angeles, said Ruth Benell, the commission’s executive director. The project is located between Marina del Rey and Playa del Rey and is expected to provide homes for 20,000 people and include nearly 3 million square feet of office space.

Schabarum said that he has attended only one or two commission meetings since the Waters law went into effect because he wants to avoid the potential of a conflict. “I don’t need any more criticism,” the supervisor said.

Opponents of the current law also contend that another problem could be posed when the commission receives petitions for incorporation with thousands of signatures are presented to the commission.

“How is the supervisor supposed to know if anyone on the list gave $250?” Benell asked. However, Donovan said that merely signing a petition would not qualify someone as a participant in a case before a commission.

Concerns Raised

Benell has raised her concerns about the law with Michael Montgomery, a former South Pasadena mayor who is a member of the Fair Political Practices Commission.

Montgomery, who said he supports Lewis’ legislation, earlier this month asked the commission to consider supporting Lewis’ legislation. The matter is on the commission’s March agenda.

“I do not believe a $250-donation is going to influence a Los Angeles County supervisor,” Montgomery said.

In contrast, Rochelle Browne, deputy city attorney for Agoura Hills, said that groups appearing before local agency commissions “are concerned about the influence of campaign contributions” and commissioners should shy away from the appearance of violating the law.

Waters’ bill, besides spelling out conflict-of-interest rules for members, also channeled about $660,000 to the Fair Political Practices Commission to crack down on local officials violating the state Political Reform Act.