Bishop McFarland Joins Opposition to Condoms Statement

The Catholic bishop of Orange County added his voice Monday to a chorus of concern about the wording of last week’s statement by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops on the use of condoms and AIDS education.

“I don’t like things that are imprecise or ambivalent,” said Bishop Norman F. McFarland of Orange County, describing his opposition to the language that won the bishops’ approval.

The portion of the bishops’ 30-page report that has set off the debate reads, in part: “Educational efforts, if grounded in the broader moral vision . . . could include accurate information about prophylactic devices or other practices proposed by some medical experts as potential means of preventing AIDS.

‘Part of Factual Picture’

“We are not promoting the use of prophylactics,” the bishops wrote, “but merely providing information that is part of the factual picture.”

Since the report was issued on Thursday, some conservative Catholic bishops around the country, led by New York’s Cardinal John O’Connor, have criticized the wording and interpretation of the statement. O’Connor called the release of the paper as written “a grave mistake.”

O’Connor said Monday that the policy paper on AIDS “has resulted in serious confusion. Some portions of the text have been construed as supporting toleration of educational approaches which I cannot accept as applicable within my area of church jurisdiction.”

O’Connor, who was in Rome when the report was released in Washington, said he would not allow condom use to be explained or discussed in his diocese’s schools, hospitals and youth programs.

Other criticism came from around the United States.

Cardinal Bernard F. Law of Boston, together with 15 other New England bishops, said in a statement that the policy paper spread confusion. “Abstinence is the only morally acceptable way to avoid the sexual transmission of AIDS,” they said. “Apart from the fact that the use of condoms does not guarantee protection from AIDS, their use is morally unacceptable.”

Detroit Archbishop Edmund Szoka called the statement confusing and said he “will not permit use of the document in the archdiocese.”

A spokesman for Baltimore Archbishop William Borders said the archdiocese probably would not oppose mention of condoms. “We would endorse the principle of the statement, including complete factual information . . . presented in a context which stresses moral values and encourages people to live by our traditions,” said Father William Au.

Archbishop Roger M. Mahony of Los Angeles made no comment Monday, but his secretary, Father Lawrence Estrada, said, “A statement is forthcoming, we hope before the end of the week.”

One year ago, the Los Angeles Archdiocese withdrew its support of an AIDS education program aimed at Latino church members because the workshops included an explicit discussion of condoms as a way to prevent spread of the disease. Only one presentation, set up by AIDS Project Los Angeles, was held before the archdiocese pulled out.

Orange County’s McFarland said that during the course of a 90-minute meeting Nov. 14 of the conference’s 50-member administrative board in Washington, D.C., he tried repeatedly but unsuccessfully to clarify the language, sensing that the wording “would lead to headlines around the country.”

The policy paper was not put up for a vote at the bishops’ general meeting. But Carl Eifert, a spokesman for the national bishops’ conference, said that given the urgency of the AIDS epidemic, it was decided not to wait until the next assemblage in June.

O’Connor said that the report should not have been issued without a full vote of the bishops’ conference’s 380 members. Asked if the assembled bishops would have rejected the paper’s condom provision, he responded: “Unquestionably.”

The final wording of the section “seems to imply our condonation, our acceptance” of the use of condoms, said McFarland, who was trained as a canon lawyer.

In fact, he said, the church questions the effectiveness of condoms and considers their use wrong.

“But because using them is wrong doesn’t mean you don’t mention them,” McFarland said. “It’s not that you don’t make mention of the realities of life.”

He added: “I have no problem with (condoms) being mentioned in the proper Catholic context.”

O’Connor said he had received support from bishops from “all over the country,” including retiring Cardinal John Krol of Philadelphia and Krol’s designated successor, Bishop Anthony Bevilacqua of Pittsburgh, Archbishop Theodore McCarrick of Newark, N.J., and McFarland.

Although McCarrick criticized the policy paper itself, Krol and Bevilacqua said Monday that it merely had been misinterpreted.

McFarland characterized the report as “a very fine statement,” stressing that sexual abstinence outside of marriage and fidelity within marriage--along with avoidance of intervenous drug use--are the best ways to contain the spread of AIDS.

Support for the document came from Seattle Archbishop Raymond Hunthausen, who was the subject of a Vatican investigation for his allegedly unorthodox views. Hunthausen said he fully supported the paper and called it “a much-needed expression by church leadership on how Catholics should respond to the AIDS crisis.”

Cardinal Joseph Bernardin of Chicago, a member of the bishops’ AIDS task force and a leader of the American church’s liberal wing, said he was “particularly pleased with the document.”

The diocese of Cleveland will follow the bishops’ recommendations, including mention of condoms, according to a spokesman who said that the diocese had been doing so for two years.

‘Clarifying Statement’

In the wake of the sharp reaction to the statement from bishops around the country, Archbishop John L. May of St. Louis, president of the National Conference of Bishops, issued a “clarifying statement” on Saturday, explaining why the matter of condoms was included in the report.

“For us not to address such aspects of the AIDS phenomenon would leave people to learn of them from factually misleading campaigns designed to sell certain products or to advocate ‘safe sex’ without reference to a moral perspective,” May said. “Many public health officials have recommended use of condoms to reduce the risk of transmitting or acquiring the AIDS virus, and we acknowledge this fact will be part of a comprehensive factual presentation on the disease.”

McFarland said that earlier Monday he had met with the diocesan staff to draw up a general policy to present the AIDS issue to Catholics in Orange County. Teaching staffs and parents’ boards at individual Catholic schools will be responsible for specific programs, McFarland said.

The bishop is the “prime educator” for Orange County’s 18,000 students in grades kindergarten through 12th grade, Supt. Sister Celine said.

In addition to the bishop’s guidance, she added, they are waiting on other guidelines from the National Catholic Education Assn. in Washington, which are expected in February.

Faith Hagerty, administrative director of La Amistad de Jose, a medical clinic and community center in a Garden Grove area known as Buena Clinton, said it would be “unfair” to prohibit instruction about the use of condoms as a safeguard against AIDS.

‘Seems Really Unfair’

“I feel that when there are so many lives at stake, and from where we sit and see the spread of the disease in the Latino community, it seems really unfair,” Hagerty said.

Health officials in Orange County last week voiced concern about the number of new AIDS cases among Latino men, especially undocumented workers. One-third of the 20 new AIDS cases reported last month were Latino men, many of whom have been reluctant to come forward for testing and treatment.

“What we’re concerned about is the spread to women and children, and we have seen a few patients here who have tested positive for the AIDS virus,” Hagerty said.

“I refer to them as a product used as prophylactics which can help prevent sexually transmitted diseases. I do not talk about safeguarding against pregnancy because I have to make sure my talk falls within the parameters of the teachings of the Catholic church,” said Marya Grier, St. Joseph Hospital’s nurse epidemiologist.

Grier, who averages two speaking engagements a month to nursing colleges and outside groups for the Orange hospital, has included condoms in the AIDS talk since 1984.

“The first thing I did was ask Sister Corrine Bailey, our director of bioethics, who approved of my talk,” she said.

At St. Jude Hospital in Fullerton, spokesman Norm Anderson said the staff epidemiologist has a “very active” AIDS education program.

Times religion writer John Dart contributed to this story.