No Vote of Confidence
- Share via
In Jonathan Kirsch’s book review, “Manipulating Democracy for Profit,” (a review of Thomas Cronin’s “Direct Democracy,” March 29) we are asked, “Is there a greater travesty of democracy, a more cynical form of deceit, than a ballot initiative?”
The answer is yes, and it is paternalism. It appears that Kirsch is saying that only those who are legitimate experts, the hair-splitting intellectuals, professors, lawyers and book reviewers should have the final say about our now complicated fate.
Kirsch concludes that even the “smartest” voter is hard-pressed to understand what is truly at stake in a ballot measure when the special interests spend their money in a conscious effort to confound and mislead him. I may only have a high school diploma and I am certainly not “smart” but it is my understanding that in this country that does not yet disqualify you from deciding what is truly at stake.
ALEC VARGO
Fullerton
Sign up for our Book Club newsletter
Get the latest news, events and more from the Los Angeles Times Book Club, and help us get L.A. reading and talking.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
