School Writing Tests Cheer Educators
- Share via
If one of the goals of regular testing is to help shape what goes on in the classroom, then state and local education officials have reason to be cheered by results of a statewide survey that looks at the newly revised California Assessment Program’s writing exam.
“To show continued success on the CAP writing test, schools must develop a multi-year approach to writing instruction that crosses all grade levels and subject areas,” state Supt. of Public Instruction Bill Honig said when the test results were made public in February. And that is apparently what is happening.
The statewide survey by two college professors showed that the writing exam is having an effect on the English curriculum in junior high and middle schools.
Professors Sandra Murphy of San Francisco State University and Charles Cooper of UC San Diego sent their survey to eighth-grade teachers at 600 randomly selected schools, and more than 90% of English teachers responding said the test will strengthen the curriculum at their schools.
The annual test, administered to 308,000 eighth-graders last spring, covers eight types of writing. All essays must be completed in 45 minutes, and each is scored to measure thinking and writing process skills as well as such mechanics of writing as spelling and grammar.
More than 90% of the survey respondents also said they have already changed the way they teach writing because of the test, and 78% said they now make more writing assignments.
Four types of writing--autobiographical incident, evaluation, problem solution and report of information--were introduced when the writing assessment program was launched in 1987. First-hand biography and story were added in 1988, followed last year by the addition of observational writing and speculation about causes or effects.
A writing exam for 12th-graders was begun in the fall of 1988 and will be fully implemented with eight tests this November. State officials are considering whether to add writing tests for sixth-graders and possibly even for third-graders.
HOW TO READ THE SCORES
Here are the school-by-school results of the California Assessment Program’s writing exam that was administered to eighth-graders throughout the state last spring.
The exam consists of eight tests of writing ability and represents the state’s biggest step to date away from the much-criticized multiple-choice method of testing academic achievement.
Results are listed by school district and by individual school so that parents can compare the performance of youngsters in their community with that of students in the rest of Los Angeles County and throughout California. (Schools are listed alphabetically by district.)
Because the exam was changed substantially last year with the addition of two more writing tests, only the latest round of scores is listed.
The scaled score is a combination of results on each of the eight separate writing tests. The statewide average score was 255 for eighth-graders, and the average in Los Angeles County was 230.
State rank shows the school or district’s rank (on a scale of 1 to 99), comparing its scores to scores of every other school or district in the state.
Relative rank is a way to compare a district or school with another that is similar to it in terms of student ethnic and socioeconomic makeup and students’ ability to speak English fluently, as well as how often those students move from school to school. The value listed is the school’s percentile rank within its comparison group.
Burbank Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 271 66 68
JORDAN
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 231 29 35
LUTHER BURBANK
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 280 71 88
MUIR
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 290 78 63
Castaic Union DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 278 72 74
CASTAIC MIDDLE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 278 69 74
Eastside Union DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 240 38 46
EASTSIDE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 240 38 46
Glendale Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 269 63 78
ROOSEVELT
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 211 17 49
ROSEMONT
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 292 80 64
TOLL
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 270 64 83
WILSON
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 287 76 91
Hughes-Elizabeth Lakes DISTICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 274 69 51
HUGHES-ELIZABETH LAKES
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 274 66 51
Keppel Union DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 242 40 31
ALMONDALE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 237 35 28
LAKE LOS ANGELES
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 263 59 47
Lancaster DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 258 52 26
PARK VIEW
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 272 65 33
PIUTE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 240 38 17
Las Virgenes Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 335 95 75
LINDERO CANYON
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 331 94 72
WRIGHT
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 340 95 79
Los Angeles Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 202 16 21
BYRD
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 186 9 6
BYRD JR HIGH FUND.
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 238 36 32
COLUMBUS
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 218 21 26
PORTOLA MAGNET
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 382 99 97
FROST
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 224 25 8
FULTON
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 190 10 26
HALE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 262 57 16
HENRY
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 245 42 22
HOLMES
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 240 38 13
IRVING
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 204 15 34
LAWRENCE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 241 39 47
MACLAY
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 165 3 9
MADISON
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 218 21 29
MILLIKAN
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 234 32 25
MT. GLEASON
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 223 24 23
MULHOLLAND
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 197 12 5
NOBEL
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 233 32 4
NOBEL FUND JR. HIGH
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 255 50 6
NORTHRIDGE JUNIOR
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 223 24 44
OLIVE VISTA JUNIOR
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 206 15 32
PACOIMA JR COM.
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 238 36 11
PACOIMA JUNIOR HIGH
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 173 5 10
PACOIMA S/M
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 212 18 3
PARKMAN
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 244 41 11
PORTER
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 232 31 29
PORTER MAGNET
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 337 95 91
PORTOLA
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 240 38 6
REED
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 241 39 22
SAN FERNANDO JUNIOR
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 171 4 11
SEPULVEDA
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 198 12 8
SEPULVEDA MAGNET
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 406 99 99
SHERMAN OAKS CES
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 258 54 6
SUTTER
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 213 19 7
VALLEY ALTERNATIVE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 286 75 48
VAN NUYS JR. HIGH
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 195 10 14
Palmdale DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 243 40 36
JUNIPER
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 240 38 42
SAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 245 42 31
Soledad-Agua Dulce Union DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 261 57 32
HIGH DESERT
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 261 56 32
Westside Union DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 270 65 40
DEL SUR
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 237 35 32
WALKER
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 277 69 42
William S. Hart Union DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 291 81 42
ARROYO SECO
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 287 76 36
PLACERITA
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 297 83 37
SIERRA VISTA
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 288 77 52
Wilsona DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 259 55 55
CHALLENGER
Scaled State Relative Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 259 55 55
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.