Apprehension of a Molester

A question for Ramona Ripston (executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California) and the other unnamed “critics” who believe oft-convicted child molester Joseph Noble’s civil rights were violated by the surveillance which led to his arrest (“Targeting a Child Molester,” Metro, June 3):

Just which rights are you talking about? Noble was free to go about his business (which in his case consisted of visiting countless schools and playgrounds). The police are free to watch anyone they want. Where law enforcement interceded was at the point when Noble committed a crime, something he had no right to do.

Another comment: The reason Noble was targeted is never made clear in your article. As one who is familiar with the Noble case(s), I was astounded that your reporter did not even refer to Noble’s writings--frightening descriptions of his pleasure at torturing little girls and being sexually aroused by their screams. This man is vicious and depraved.

I truly believe that the outstanding law enforcement effort led by Los Angeles County Sheriff Sherman Block saved some little girl from being a victim of this creature--and perhaps even saved her life. There’s no price tag for that.

SANDRA L. BUTTITTA, Deputy District Attorney, Torrance