Primaries
- Share via
In response to “Too Bad This State Has So Little Voice,” editorial, Feb. 19:
Bigger is not necessarily better. The advantage of a small state like New Hampshire holding the first primary is that its citizens are afforded an opportunity to size up the candidates personally, instead of having to rely upon 30-second sound-bites on television.
It would be virtually impossible for a candidate like Paul Tsongas, with a well-developed program but short on campaign funds, to get his message out in a state as vast as California, where successful candidates must depend upon expensive mass saturation of the airwaves.
Agreed, California should play a more pivotal role in deciding who the eventual nominees of each party should be, but the nation is better served by leaving New Hampshire first.
JIM REDHEAD, Oakland
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
