Advertisement

2 Views of King Drawn by Lawyers : Trial: In a surprise, the attorney for Officer Briseno says his client was trying to stop the beating by others who, he says, were ‘out of control.’

Share via
TIMES STAFF WRITER

Repeatedly playing the widely seen videotape and displaying giant copies of police reports, prosecutors and defense lawyers in the Rodney G. King beating case Thursday alternately portrayed the motorist either as the innocent victim of an unprovoked police attack or as a violent man whose beating resulted from his refusal to follow orders.

But in a surprise development, the attorney for one of four officers implicated in the beating broke from his colleagues, saying that the officers wielding their batons were “out of control” and that Officer Theodore J. Briseno had tried to stop them from repeatedly kicking and pummeling King.

“He sees Mr. King moving and he wants Mr. King flat so Mr. King can be put into custody,” said John Barnett, Briseno’s lawyer. “He wants the beating to cease.”

Advertisement

After a year of debate and pretrial hearings, Thursday’s opening statements marked the first time that the two sides formally presented their versions of the incident that touched off a major scandal within the Los Angeles Police Department.

As befits the worldwide attention given the case, hundreds of television, radio and print media representatives jammed the small East County Courthouse in Simi Valley, where the case was moved in hopes of finding an impartial jury. Dozens of uniformed Ventura County deputies stood guard as an elaborate metal detector system was set up to examine courtroom spectators.

The prosecution began its presentation with what undoubtedly will stand as the trial’s key piece of evidence: the graphic, 81-second videotape shot by amateur cameraman George Holliday. Broadcast around the globe, the tape shows officers raining more than 50 blows on King as he lay handcuffed on the ground in a Lake View Terrace neighborhood.

Advertisement

As prosecutors and defense lawyers began to lay out their strategies, it became clear that the cases will turn on the widely divergent interpretations each side has given to the video’s grainy, often out-of-focus images.

Prosecutors called the beating “unnecessary and unjustified,” even though they acknowledged that King was drunk on the night of the beating, and had led police on a wild chase through the San Fernando Valley at speeds greater than 110 m.p.h.

“Whatever Rodney King was, or whatever Rodney King did, it did not justify what you saw on this videotape,” said White, the lead prosecutor.

Advertisement

“You have a man who was down, a man who was not resisting, a man who was not aggressive,” White added, pointing to the images on a large-screen television placed next to the jury box.

“And yet, those blows from those batons continue and continue and continue for no justifiable reason.”

But defense attorneys focused on what they said was King’s erratic behavior as he stepped out of his Hyundai, contending that he repeatedly refused to obey officers’ commands and posed a danger to them as they tried to make an arrest.

“Timothy Wind dealt with the situation as it unfolded in accordance with his experience and training,” Paul DePasquale, the attorney for former Officer Timothy E. Wind, told the jury in summarizing a likely defense posture for all of the officers. “He had learned how to handle himself in the Los Angeles Police Academy.”

And, the attorney added, “his situation was one of fear and frustration, and not pleasure in inflicting injuries.”

Despite the common threads woven through the arguments presented by the officers’ lawyers, it became clear midway through the day that the defense is far from united.

Advertisement

Barnett at first indicated that he might not deliver an opening statement. But after his colleagues had addressed the jury, he stepped forward and signaled a willingness to go it alone.

While his client, Briseno, appears on the videotape to be kicking King in the head, Barnett said the officer was using his foot to hold King down and end the beating.

“He’s not stomping but attempting to place his foot down,” Barnett said of his client. “He pushed Powell back because Officer Briseno was afraid Mr. King would be further beaten.”

As to the other officers seen in the videotape, Barnett said Briseno’s perception “is that they’re out of control.”

In addition to Briseno, 39, and Wind, 31, Sgt. Stacey C. Koon, 41, and Officer Laurence M. Powell, 29, face charges of assault in the beating. Koon and Powell also were charged with filing false reports. All have pleaded not guilty.

If convicted, the men face sentences ranging from four to eight years in prison.

Turning away from the beating, prosecutor White at one point attempted to impugn the character of Koon and Powell, telling the jury of seven men and five women that the officers had attempted to minimize the degree of King’s injuries in the reports they filed.

Advertisement

In their opening statements, several of the defense lawyers focused their arguments to the jury on the high-speed chase that King led officers before the incident. They emphasized that King’s blood-alcohol level was more than twice the legal limit, and that police believed that King was under the influence of PCP, a dangerous drug that can trigger violent behavior.

They walked the jury through the options available to the officers in subduing a dangerous felon. And they stressed that King was struck and kicked only after he repeatedly refused to obey their commands to lay still on the ground, face down, with his arms and legs extended.

Darryl Mounger, Koon’s attorney, said: “He (Koon) is experienced and he is in charge of his officers. But the evidence will show that he was not in charge of this incident. The only one person who was in charge of this incident was Rodney Glenn King.”

Powell’s attorney, Michael Stone, told the jury that King not only refused to lay still, but repeatedly tried to rise from the ground and stand up--actions that the officers took as threatening.

Using an FBI-enhanced copy of the videotape, coupled with still photographs and glossy overlays, Stone contended that King can be seen attempting to rise.

“In the hundredths-of-a-second between this photograph and this photograph,” Stone said at one point, “Mr. King is again coming up off the ground, and he charges Officer Powell.”

Advertisement

Stone said his client immediately viewed King’s actions as a threat. “When he (Powell) was assaulted, he drew his baton,” Stone said.

King, in an interview with prosecutors, said he was not trying to fight with the police, but instead attempting to flee out of fear for his life.

After a month of jury selection, the second phase of the trial--opening statements and testimony--got under way Thursday morning at an extremely crowded Simi Valley courthouse.

Representatives of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People reappeared at the courthouse, voicing concerns about the makeup of the 12-member jury. All of the jurors are white, except for one Latina and one Asian-American woman.

Advertisement