6 More Bases in California May Be Targeted for Closure : Military: Point Mugu and Corona facilities are likely to be among those panel adds to hit list. Opponents of shutdown dispute cost savings estimates.

The nation’s base closing commission will consider adding the Point Mugu Navy base near Oxnard, the Naval Warfare Assessment Division in Corona and at least four other California military installations to the Pentagon’s list of facilities now being scrutinized for shutdown, sources said.

At a meeting today on Capitol Hill, commission staff will suggest closing Point Mugu, based on a Defense Department audit’s conclusions that the Navy could save $1.7 billion by moving most of Point Mugu’s missile-testing work and 9,000 jobs to its sister base at China Lake in the Mojave Desert.

The staff will also suggest that the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission take a hard look at closing the Corona naval warfare facility, which employs 1,100 workers, McClellan Air Force Base near Sacramento and three Bay Area bases, according to sources close to the commission.

The Corona facility, the Naval Supply Center in Oakland and two small shipbuilding and engineering facilities in San Francisco were removed from consideration earlier this year out of concern that their closure would economically cripple California, where 22 bases have been ordered shut since 1988.

It takes a majority of the eight commissioners to add any bases to the hit list. If a base joins the list, said commission spokesman Wade Nelson, “all this means is that it will be added for further review. We are quite a few steps away from closing any bases.”

Yet leaks of the renewed threat to Point Mugu spread panic among defense contractors and local officials who have been trying to protect Ventura County’s largest employer from being ordered to shut its gates. “We are desperately short of funds to carry on this level of fight,” said Cal Carrera, a defense industry executive and co-chairman of local lobbying task force.

Rep. Elton Gallegly (R-Simi Valley) said he and Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein made last-minute appeals to commissioners Tuesday to keep Point Mugu and other California bases off the hit list.

None of the last-ditch efforts seemed to make much headway, he said.

“It is my understanding that we have one rogue commissioner who is intent on making a motion to add Mugu to the list,” Gallegly said. “We had hoped to get this man’s attention.”

Even if Point Mugu is added, the congressman said, supporters have a strong case to defend the base against a report by the Defense Department’s inspector general that Gallegly said was full of errors. “It’s an out-and-out fraud,” he said.

In the 57-page report, auditors concluded that the Navy could eliminate overlapping programs and save $1.7 billion over 20 years if it moved most of Point Mugu’s work to China Lake.

Auditors acknowledged that there would be no net savings in the first five years because it would cost $518 million to move Point Mugu’s facilities and scatter most of its 9,000 jobs to China Lake and other bases.

Navy officials vigorously challenged the notion that there would be any savings, citing what they called the faulty assumption that Point Mugu is scheduled for a major reduction in workload.

They pointed out numerous errors in the report, including those that projected large savings of tax dollars by combining work on the Navy’s FA-18 Hornet jet fighter.

Those projected cost reductions, Navy officials said, were literally off base: All of Point Mugu’s Hornets were transferred to China Lake years ago, where nearly all of the testing is now done.

Adm. Dana B. McKinney, commanding officer of both Point Mugu and China Lake, said he was surprised that the commission would consider the inspector general’s report a reason to add Point Mugu to the closure list.

“If that is the basis, the . . . report will finally get all of the scrutiny it deserves,” McKinney said.

On Saturday, McKinney rerouted his flight from Pensacola, Fla., to Washington so he could rebut the inspector general’s report and argue the merits of keeping Point Mugu open. Navy officials say the base is needed as the launching pad for its weapons-testing range that covers 36,000 square miles over the Pacific Ocean.

McKinney warned that it would be a big mistake for the Navy to be forced to close Point Mugu--a base it ranked second-highest in military value among its technical centers.

“I view this as an unfortunate turn of events,” McKinney said, after learning from Navy officials of the commission’s interest in Point Mugu. “If, in fact, it gets put on the list, we will have to counter as we can.”

In previous base-closing rounds, commissioners have agreed to add bases to the Pentagon’s list for the purpose of closer examination--particularly if they catch the interest of a member of the commission.

But the vast majority of these late additions were never closed. When all of the evidence is presented, the commissioners have tended to stick closely to the official recommendations from the Pentagon.

The commission is already considering the closure of a number of California bases that the Pentagon argued are no longer affordable in the post-Cold War era.

They include the Long Beach Naval Shipyard, the Onizuka Air Station in San Jose and the Air National Guard stations in Ontario and north Highlands.

The commission, which will hold regional hearings near any add-on bases, must complete its deliberations and forward a list of bases for closure to President Clinton by July 1.