Airport for El Toro Gets Support in Critical Vote

In the most critical vote so far on the future of El Toro Marine Corps Air Station, the Orange County Planning Commission on Thursday endorsed an environmental impact report that portrays a major international airport as the best use for the base.

The 4-1 vote followed more than five hours of testimony split almost evenly between supporters who called the 35-volume report a thorough analysis and opponents who labeled it a fraudulent document that ignores their concerns about noise, safety and other issues.

With the exception of just one commissioner, who lives under the proposed airport’s flight paths, the influential panel said the report properly addresses a variety of issues at this early stage in the base reuse planning process.

“I think they’ve done a magnificent job,” Planning Commissioner E. “Chuck” McBurney said.

Commissioner Clarice A. Blamer said the commission’s job was to decide “whether this EIR is adequate for this point in the process,” and that it was.

Commissioner Tom Moody of Laguna Niguel grilled the county’s consultants on their conclusions about noise and air pollution. Finding the explanations wanting and the report too speculative, he cast the sole vote against the report.

“I realize there are things that need to be addressed down the line,” Moody said. But he added that was troubled by the size of the project, and wondered whether it would require wide-scale soundproofing of homes or mass condemnations of property.

“We don’t know any of that now,” he said.

The decision came a day after the Orange County Airport Commission and the El Toro Citizens Advisory Commission finished their reviews and urged that county decision-makers move ahead with a plan that could result in one of the nation’s largest international airports after the military closes the base by 1999.

The Planning Commission’s voice is seen as the most important among the three commissions because of its expertise in environmental and planning issues. The vote now sends the report to the County Board of Supervisors, which will act on the airport plan sometime in December.

Comments by the public Thursday were supposed to be technical in nature, as airport foes challenged the report’s completeness. But the emotion that has long marked the El Toro debate also was present.

Laguna Niguel Councilman Mark Goodman said the report was so shoddy that those who wrote it “should be ashamed to put their names on the document.”

A 91-year-old resident of the Laguna Hills area said, “I can see my last years in Leisure World ruined.”

The meeting drew the largest turnout to date of airport supporters, who have twice carried countywide elections backing an El Toro Airport but who have rarely attended hearings on the reuse of the base.

“The airport at El Toro is the right decision for Orange County,” said Bart Hanson of Lemon Heights, even though he said he expects he will be bothered by aircraft noise.

Darrel Anderson, a general partner of Knott’s Berry Farm, said the base “is a watershed opportunity for Orange County,” echoing comments of others who believe an airport will be good for tourism and business.

All three commissions approved the report but called for further study of the issues that opponents worry most about: how to control noise, traffic and pollution and answer the safety concerns of residents living near the base or under proposed flight paths. The commissions also urged consideration of limiting night flights and the impact an airport would have on real estate values.

Irvine residents concerned about noise received several key concessions from the county as a result of weeks of complaints from residents and concerns expressed by county officials.

The base reuse will abide by projections for a noise pattern, which would mean steering flights over nonresidential areas. And an airport at El Toro would not pursue takeoffs to the west over Irvine, officials said.

That still places the county in position to do battle with a national pilots union, which has questioned the safety of easterly takeoffs.

The report in question, produced by county staff at John Wayne Airport and the Environmental Management Agency, along with hired consultants, analyzed three reuse options:

* An international passenger-cargo airport capable of serving up to 38.3 million annual passengers, surrounded by compatible uses. This would keep John Wayne open just for general aviation needs.

* A cargo-general aviation airport, surrounded by compatible uses. This would expand John Wayne airport for commercial passenger travel.

* Nonaviation, mixed uses, including a visitor-oriented attraction and institutional or educational facility, such as a college campus, surrounded by residential and recreational areas and land for light industrial businesses and research and development.

What to do with the surplus military base is the most sweeping planning issue facing the county and easily the most hotly debated.

Supporters say an airport would bring jobs, help the economy and offer travelers convenience.

Opponents say planes flying overhead around the clock would destroy their home values and make their lives miserable. The environmental impact report, they argue, has glossed over their concerns.

For example, critics said, the document does not provide detailed information about how traffic jams around such a major airport would be lessened, and fails to give an honest snapshot of airport noise impact.

County officials counter that the document is a “tiered” environmental impact report. This first level of the planning process merely offers a preliminary analysis of the base reuse options--and can do little more at this time.

For example, officials said, the county cannot produce a valid noise analysis until county supervisors decide what kind of airport they want at El Toro, since planes serving different aviation needs produce varying levels of noise.

County planners and commissioners said much of the public concern over an El Toro airport comes from the public’s misunderstanding of the environmental document. State environmental guidelines require the county to predict a “worst case” scenario at an international El Toro airport, which is how they came to the projection that such an airport could serve as many as 38.3 million passengers annually, they said.

However, they said, the county can decide to place a smaller civilian airport at El Toro.

(BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX / INFOGRAPHIC)

THE KEY DECISION MAKERS

An important step in deciding whether a civilian airport is built at El Toro Marine Corps Air Station takes place Thursday. That’s when the Orange County Planning Commission votes whether to recommend approval of the environmental impact report on reuse options for the military base.

With the commission’s recommendation, the controversial report then goes before the Orange County Board of Supervisors, which will decide the fate of the 4,700-acre military base in December.

You can attend the commission’s public hearing at 1:30 p.m. at the Hall of Administration in Santa Ana. Comments can be faxed to commissioners at (714) 834-4652. County officials recommend that comments be sent as early as possible so commissioners can review them before the hearing.

You can write to the Orange County Board of Supervisors at the Hall of Administration, 10 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Phone and fax numbers for district offices are below. Comments should be sent as early as possible so supervisors can review them before their December hearing. Time and date to be announced.

Here are the key decision makers:

Orange County Planning Commissioners:

Ben Nielsen: 51, past mayor, city councilman, planning commissioner in Fountain Valley. Furniture manufacturer, active in Republican Party, Lincoln Club member. Recently appointed to the commission by 1st District Supervisor Roger R. Stanton. Describes himself as pro-business.

Shirley Commons Long: Huntington Beach real estate agent. Director for state and national realty associations. Second District Supervisor Jim Silva’s appointment to the county planning commission. Served since 1993. Stressed that her job is to decide the whether the environmental report meets guidelines and not whether the airport itself should be approved.

Clarice A. Blamer: 74, past mayor, councilwoman, planning commissioner in Brea. Retired high school teacher. Six years on county Transportation Commission. Served on the planning commission since 1991 and reappointed by 3rd District Supervisor Don Saltarelli. Advocates planned growth.

E. Chuck McBurney: 67, former Anaheim planning commissioner. Land surveyor for private engineering firm. Appointed to county Planning Commission five years ago from the 4th District, which is also served by Supervisor William G. Steiner. Says no-growth proponents unreasonable.

Tom Moody: 54, of Laguna Niguel. Teaches American government at Estancia High School in Costa Mesa and political science at Saddleback College in Mission Viejo. Planning commissioner for 12 years, representing 5th District. Reappointed by then-Supervisor Marian Bergeson. Self-described reasonable environmentalist.

****

Orange County Supervisors:

Roger R. Stanton: 59, of Fountain Valley. The current board chairman. Stanton’s term expires next month after 16 years representing his district, where voters repeatedly endorsed an El Toro airport. But Stanton has voiced concerns about an airport’s effect on noise, traffic and safety in South County. Office: (714) 834-3110; Fax: (714) 834-5754.

Jim Silva: 52, Former Huntington Beach councilman and high school teacher. Likely to seek reelection when term ends in December 1998, placing him on track to become senior board member. A majority of his district’s residents favor an El Toro airport. Office: (714) 834-3220; Fax: (714) 834-6109.

Don Saltarelli: 55, of Orange, owns Century 21 Realty in Tustin. Stepping down at year’s end after serving the remainder of former Supervisor Gaddi H. Vasquez’s term. Saltarelli’s district is divided over an airport. He said he won’t support a major international airport at El Toro, but could back a smaller airport. Office: (714) 834-3330; Fax: (714) 834-2786.

William G. Steiner: 59, of Orange. The former head of the Orangewood Children’s Home was appointed to the board in March 1993. Will not seek election when term ends in December 1998. Voters in his district rely heavily on tourism and favor an El Toro airport. But Steiner remains worried about an airport’s negative effects on South County residents. Office: (714) 834-3440; Fax: (714) 834-2045.

NOTE: Supervisor Marian Bergeson recently resigned to become the state’s education chief. Gov. Pete Wilson is expected soon to name a replacement for Bergeson, who opposed a major airport at El Toro.

(BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX / INFOGRAPHIC)

What’s Coming

El Toro Marine Corps Air Station began military operations in 1943 and later went on to become the largest Marine air installation in the western U.S. It played a key role as a military launching point during the Persian Gulf War and during operations in Somalia and Bosnia. Federal officials decided the 4,700-acre base has outlived its usefulness and in 1993 ordered that it eventually be shut as a cost-saving measure. The military has no final date to retire the base, but expects to do so in mid-1999.

The county is sharply divided over the base’s reuse. County residents may still get involved in El Toro’s future by attending public meetings to be held at the county Hall of Administration. Important dates, subject to change:

Nov. 21: Planning Commission meets at 1:30 p.m. to issue recommendation.

December: Supervisors meet to consider recommendations and make their final choice on reuse; no date or time set.

Dec. 30: County deadline to submit final reuse plan to the Navy; plan sets off a round of federal studies and meetings, including a more detailed analysis of base contamination.

****

Getting the Report

The draft environmental report and its supporting documents are available at county libraries. The entire report or portions of it can be purchased by calling (714) 660-1150.