Advertisement

DWP Failed to Inform Council on Tainted Wells, Lawmakers Say

Share
SPECIAL TO THE TIMES

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power officials were aware of increasing evidence that a suspected carcinogen had tainted drinking water supplies but failed to sound a public warning, according to two City Council members.

DWP officials served two years on a state and local task force studying the threat posed by the chemical chromium 6, but didn’t share key findings with the council, said Los Angeles council members Laura Chick and Joel Wachs.

Chromium 6, a byproduct of the metal plating process, is a suspected carcinogen. The state Department of Health Services is studying a proposal to reduce allowable levels of chromium in drinking water as a means of reducing chromium 6.

Advertisement

“The DWP, in particular, is a watchdog agency regarding water and water quality,” Chick said. “It should be coming forward on its own initiative, wanting to share and disseminate information about concerns regarding our drinking water.”

Wachs said: “They’ve dismissed information as insignificant that highly respected people say has been a cause for alarm. But they have been derelict in their approach. These testing results are cause for concern and they shouldn’t keep it from people.”

DWP General Manager S. David Freeman did not dispute the criticism.

“If the council feels we should have reported it earlier, they’re right,” Freeman said. “We don’t argue with the council people. We found traces of chromium 6 with our super-duper detection equipment and we reported it to the health department. With the benefit of hindsight, anything that becomes controversial should have been reported.”

Wachs was alerted to the proposed chromium standard in an October 1998 letter from Mel Blevins, the court-appointed water master overseeing ground water in the San Fernando Valley. The Valley wells are a major source of drinking water for the cities of Los Angeles, Burbank and San Fernando.

As a result, Blevins was called before a council committee in November 1998. But Blevins and DWP officials said the water was safe. Closing wells to comply with the proposed standards would raise the cost of water by forcing the city to import more, they said at the time.

The committee asked for more information, and a 1999 DWP survey of 10 Valley wells found that nine wells had chromium 6, but only two exceeded the proposed state limit of 2.5 ppb of chromium.

Advertisement

Additional testing in June 1999 showed 13 out of 14 DWP wells and three imported water sources contained chromium 6 varying from trace amounts to 4.7 ppb, said Pankaj Parekh, the DWP’s manager of regulatory compliance.

Blevins said although there is evidence that chromium 6 can cause cancer when inhaled, there isn’t enough data to prove chromium 6 is a health threat when consumed in water. He said, therefore, there was no need to alert city officials.

“There was nothing to report that alarmed us,” Blevins said. “If the [chromium 6] values had been higher, I would have said we needed to report it. Nothing jumped out.”

But Wachs said he agrees with health officials who say chromium 6 poses a health threat and should not be present in the water. The councilman added that DWP officials should have passed on 18 months worth of test results and communications showing chromium 6 had turned up in more water wells, including ones operated by the DWP, Burbank and Glendale water systems.

The handling of the chromium 6 issue by the Department of Water and Power and other agencies is scheduled to be addressed today by the City Council.

Meanwhile, Freeman said this week that the DWP has closed two drinking water wells because of high concentrations of chromium, which typically indicates high chromium 6 levels.

Advertisement

The Times reported last month that a 1998 proposal to cut allowable amounts of chromium in water--to reduce levels of chromium 6--was still being studied by state officials, who said it may take another five years to implement a tougher standard.

In response, the Legislature passed SB 2127, requiring an accelerated review of the Valley’s chromium-tainted water. The bill is on Gov. Gray Davis’ desk. State Sens. Adam Schiff (D-Burbank) and Tom Hayden (D-Los Angeles) have called for hearings.

Los Angeles County officials have begun testing tap water for chromium 6 in 100 county facilities such as hospitals and fire stations, said Wasfy Shindy, director of the county’s environmental toxicology lab. The study, which will include 20 test sites in each of the five supervisorial districts, was ordered by by the Board of Supervisors last week.

*

Blankstein is a Times staff writer and Jacobs is a freelance writer.

Advertisement