Advertisement

Trial in Market Crash Set to Begin

Share
Times Staff Writer

George Russell Weller told police he had no idea how the car he was driving accelerated through a crowded farmers market in Santa Monica more than three years ago.

Nor, Weller said within an hour of the incident, did he know how his car came to a stop after leaving nearly 1,000 feet of carnage, 10 people dead and more than 60 injuries in its wake.

Weller spoke of the “poor people” who died and his “contribution” to their deaths, and mused on divine purpose in an interview with police that day, July 16, 2003. He tried repeatedly to describe what happened, grasping for any explanation that made sense.

Advertisement

A Los Angeles County Superior Court jury is to be chosen, beginning Tuesday, to decide whether Weller, who learned to drive on a Ford Model T, committed a crime or just played an unfortunate role in a tragedy.

He is charged with 10 counts of manslaughter. If convicted, Weller, 89, would become one of the oldest of the 161,000 inmates in the California prison system. (The oldest is 93, according to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.)

Jurors must draw the sort of fine distinctions between carelessness and recklessness that have bedeviled such panels for centuries. But they probably will do so without hearing from Weller, who has refused to testify in civil lawsuits filed by the injured and survivors of the deceased, citing his 5th Amendment right not to incriminate himself.

That leaves what Weller said three years ago.

In the police interrogation, contained in 43 pages of transcripts obtained last week by The Times, Weller sounded contrite, bewildered -- and uncomprehending.

He lamented not taking his wife’s advice. Their niece was to be married in San Diego that weekend, and he wanted to make sure that she received their written congratulations. Weller told officers he had rejected his wife’s suggestion that he hand the envelope to their letter carrier.

“If I had listened to her and given it to Earnie and gone back in and sat down by the couch and minded my own damn business, I would have never been there....”

Advertisement

He seemed to marvel at what he saw as the innocent beginning of that deadly day. He mailed the letter at the post office at Arizona Avenue and 4th Street and took a wrong turn toward the farmers market.

“How do you figure that a single thing like that would be a precursor to all of the agony that I brought to people?”

Weller was asked about his World War II service, his bout with cancer and his ill wife. He sounded intelligent.

“God almighty, those poor people. Poor, poor, tragic people.... And what a tragic ending to their outing, and I contributed to it, which is just almost more than I can figure out.”

In the interview, Weller asked repeatedly what had happened to those he ran down at the Santa Monica Farmers’ Market. But he struggled to describe what he was doing, what he was thinking.

“When I finally came to a rest -- my God, what have I done? And right to this moment I can’t tell you. From the moment that car accelerated, to the best of my knowledge, I tried everything that you do to an automobile and tried to put on the foot brake; I tried to take my foot off of the gas; I tried to take the control knob and jam it into park. Everything, anything that I thought would stop the action of the car, I tried in that block, unsuccessfully, maybe, maybe not. Because it did come to a stop. I don’t know what caused that.”

Advertisement

To make their case, prosecutors must show that Weller was criminally negligent or so severely careless as to justify imprisonment. The defense contends that Weller had one monumental, horrendous senior moment in which he tried to brake, but hit the accelerator by mistake and simply could not correct himself.

Half a dozen experts are expected to clash as they try to reconstruct, analyze and assess Weller’s mental acuity and physical ability.

National safety officials have studied the phenomenon of so-called pedal error and found thousands of examples.

Earlier this summer, an 85-year-old motorist, mistaking the gas pedal for the brake, drove his car into a crowded coffee shop in El Monte, injuring 10 people. Police said he would not be charged with a crime.

There were 427 accidents reported in the United States involving “unintended acceleration” in 1989 and 61 in 1992 -- the last year for which statistics are available -- after wider use of a mechanical change that made it impossible to put a car into gear unless the driver had a foot on the brake.

Drivers older than 70 are more than five times more likely than others to experience pedal error, according to Rae Tyson of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Advertisement

Many of the survivors of the Santa Monica incident don’t see criminal prosecution as warranted, even though progress has been slow for victims who seek to recover damages.

The Automobile Club of Southern California has contributed $500,000 -- Weller’s insurance limits -- to a fund for victims. An additional $5 million is expected from insurers for several other defendants in the case, though a judge recently cleared the city of Santa Monica of wrongdoing in organizing the market on city streets.

But Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley’s office has consistently judged Weller worthy of criminal punishment.

“This is a case about accepting responsibility and public accountability,” said Deputy Dist. Atty. Ann Ambrose. “Mr. Weller needs to take responsibility for his actions, and the victims and their families need to come to court and be heard.”

Two witnesses will testify that after Weller’s car came to a stop, he said, “If you saw me coming, you should have gotten out of my way.” Ambrose said a videotape of Weller’s statement to police is “more probative” than the transcript but would not elaborate.

To make the case, prosecutors are seeking to use Weller’s driving record. He was involved in several minor accidents during the decade before the farmers market crash.

Advertisement

And minutes before he drove through the market on Arizona Avenue between 4th and 2nd streets, he had been involved in a fender bender.

At least one witness will testify that he thinks Weller was trying to flee. The earlier incident involved scratches -- “cosmetic damage” according to police -- to a Mercedes-Benz that Weller struck from behind at a slow speed.

“The next thing he knows he’s going on down Arizona,” said Tim Walker, one of Weller’s lawyers in the civil litigation. “He describes his position as if he’s a passenger in a runaway vehicle. That was his sensation of what was happening.”

Prosecutors say that Weller was “wholly indifferent” to the consequences of his actions. “The defendant could have stopped his vehicle at any time if he had merely stepped on the brake,” according to prosecutors’ court papers.

As Weller drove through the market, prosecution witnesses will say, he was “intent,” “focused” and “determined.”

Ironically, that’s just what the defense wants to hear.

Weller was stressed by the earlier accident and became confused and disoriented, the defense contends. He reached the point where, after he made the pedal mistake, he could not correct it, they added.

Advertisement

“Weller undoubtedly went for the brake and hit the accelerator,” said Michael Piuze, who represents the deceased and injured in the civil litigation. “With our aging population, there’s hundreds of George Wellers on our roads every day.”

Richard Schmidt, a UCLA professor who has studied and written about pedal error, is expected to play a key role in the trial.

“We are talking about error in which the person has made the right choice but the lower levels in the motor system -- the muscular system -- don’t quite follow the directions that were given to them,” Schmidt said in court papers. “So even though the right choice was made, the movement comes out slightly in error.”

The California Highway Patrol studied the incident for two years and concluded that pedal misapplication “provides the best explanation” for Weller’s acceleration through the market.

If convicted of all 10 counts, Weller could be sentenced to a maximum of 18 years in prison. Jurors could acquit Weller or find him liable for misdemeanor manslaughter, which is punishable by up to six months for each of 10 counts.

“I don’t understand this prosecution at all,” said Mark Overland, Weller’s lawyer.

“Here’s a guy who’s 90 years old -- all his life he has done nothing but live an exemplary life -- he’s involved in this horrible tragedy that he’s lived with every day of his life since. It has destroyed him and has destroyed the lives of a lot people,” he said.

Advertisement

Most victims don’t want vengeance, Walker said.

“The victims obviously are not happy. But almost to a person, I don’t see anyone who is after Weller to be criminally prosecuted. They recognize he is a poor old guy who got confused,” he said.

Walker called Weller “one of the nicest guys around,” who has lived in the same house in Santa Monica for 52 years and has rarely left home since the market crash.

At police headquarters three years ago, Weller made an unusual literary allusion to the Thornton Wilder novel “The Bridge of San Luis Rey,” about an accident that killed five people when a bridge collapsed in 18th century Peru. A monk investigating the collapse believes he can discern divine purpose in the tragedy, but the Inquisition ultimately orders both the monk and his report burned at the stake.

At the end of the interview after the market tragedy, Santa Monica Police Det. Sal Lucio thanked Weller for cooperating and told him he was not under arrest.

“I’m in big trouble with my heart and soul,” Weller said. “That you can’t fix.”

*

john.spano@latimes.com

Advertisement