Too gross
- Share via
Re “Finding life’s meaning in death,” Column One, Sept. 4
It was truly a pleasure to glance at the front page of The Times -- while eating breakfast -- and be greeted with an explicit description of an autopsy. Not often does one find -- outside of a Mickey Spillane novel, anyway -- such colorful prose as “thrusts a razor into his chest, unzipping his brown skin to reveal a thick layer of yolk-colored fat.” Or, “He pulls marbled meat from the bone.” Or, “lungs, tar-speckled as if covered with spores of mold.”
My breakfast was pretty much history, and I’d only made it to the third paragraph. If I’d read further, I’m told, I would have gotten to the really good stuff: a description of the smell of death (“feces and rotten eggs”). The grotesque line about a man’s tongue being pulled from his head. Or the face being peeled from the skull.
It’s one thing to place a story like this somewhere else within the paper. But pummeling your readers in the face on the first page with vivid descriptions of a corpse being dissected is, in my opinion, unnecessary and in extremely bad taste.
I not only plan to avoid your newspaper in the future, I may never enjoy another breakfast.
John Travers
Hollywood
More to Read
Eat your way across L.A.
Get our weekly Tasting Notes newsletter for reviews, news and more.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.