U.S. shelves its plan to sharply cut nicotine in cigarettes
U.S. regulators are hitting the brakes on plans to force tobacco companies to drastically reduce addictive nicotine in cigarettes, retreating on an ambitious public-health initiative that comes amid increasing worry about nicotine use among young people.
The Department of Health and Human Services has dropped a proposal unveiled two years ago to cut the nicotine in cigarettes to nonaddictive levels, according to a regulatory document published Wednesday.
Abandoning the plan, which almost certainly would have meant a sharp reduction in tobacco sales, would be a major victory for the tobacco industry. Meanwhile, public debate is focused on the potential for e-cigarettes to create a new generation of nicotine addicts.
Shares of Marlboro cigarette maker Altria Group Inc. climbed 3.2% on Wednesday. Philip Morris International Inc. shares were flat.
In a notice posted on a government website this year as part of the Food and Drug Administration’s near-term regulatory goals, the agency said the policy “would have significant public health benefits for youth, young adults, and adults, as well as potentially vast economic benefits.”
That goal, once included as part of the “unified agenda” of regulations the government is working on, is no longer listed on the website, which was updated Wednesday as part of a semiannual review.
FDA spokesman Michael Felberbaum said the removal of the plans “does not mean the agency does not consider them a priority or will not continue to work on their development.”
The FDA “has focused on regulations that reflect its most immediate priorities,” Felberbaum said in an email. It “continues to gather evidence and data on an ongoing basis regarding all tobacco products.”
The Health and Human Services Department didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.
Documents reviewed by The Times reveal that the chemical formula that makes Juul so palatable and addictive dates back more than four decades — to Reynolds’ tobacco laboratories.
In 2017, then-FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said he wanted to reduce nicotine levels in cigarettes and other burnt tobacco to near zero. Almost half a million people in the United States die each year from tobacco-related causes, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the move was hailed at the time as a potentially monumental public-health decision.
It also shocked Wall Street: Tobacco giants’ stocks plunged as investors reconsidered whether people would bother smoking a cigarette without the addictive chemical. The move was paired with a decision — later reversed — to give e-cigarette makers extra time to keep their products on the market without regulation.
Gottlieb left the FDA before the nicotine policy could be seen through. Altria later bought a $12.8-billion stake in e-cigarette market leader Juul Labs Inc., a hedge against declining smoking rates.
“The effort to lower nicotine in cigarettes is a central part of our effort to reduce death and disease from tobacco,” Gottlieb said Wednesday. “It’s critical we all maintain our commitment to these public health goals.”
Another former FDA commissioner, Robert Califf, said on Twitter that the change marked “a sad day for future grandchildren. They will have fewer grandparents because of this.”
Altria spokesman Steven Callahan declined to comment.
The update to the U.S. regulatory agenda was published the same morning that a Senate panel was considering the nomination of Texas oncologist Stephen Hahn to be the new head of the FDA. At that hearing, Hahn was peppered with questions about the agency’s approach to the e-cigarette industry. This year, government data have shown a surge in use of e-cigarettes by teens, and thousands of Americans have suffered serious lung injuries after vaping.
The Trump administration had vowed tough curbs on flavored vaping products in September. Since then, however, the president has signaled any effort to clear the market of flavored products that appeal to young people is on hold.
The FDA’s oversight of the tobacco industry was the product of a pitched political battle that began in the 1990s and culminated in a 2009 law giving the agency oversight of cigarettes and smokeless products.
Recently, some administration officials have questioned the FDA’s role in regulating tobacco. Joe Grogan, the head of the White House Domestic Policy Council, this month called the FDA’s regulation of tobacco “a huge waste of time” and said the agency should focus on pharmaceuticals.
Your guide to our new economic reality.
Get our free business newsletter for insights and tips for getting by.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.