Vatican newspaper fails to give ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’ its blessing
An organ of the Vatican has slammed the new “Star Wars” film as a thorough disappointment because its villains are not sufficiently evil.
The Vatican’s daily newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, has given a dismal review to “Star Wars: The Force Awakens,” even as it breaks box-office records.
While the Vatican might have been expected to sing the praises of any “Star Wars” film, given the series’ depictions of the battle between good and evil, the latest installment, directed by J.J. Abrams, drops the ball on sheer badness with a crop of unconvincing villains, the non-bylined review claims.
This time around, the villains are more insipid than devilish, the paper adds.
“The counterpart of Darth Vader, Kylo Ren, wears a mask merely to emulate his predecessor, while the character who needs to substitute the emperor Palpatine as the incarnation of supreme evil represents the most serious defect of the film,” it wrote. “Without revealing anything about the character, all we will say is that it is the clumsiest and tackiest result you can obtain from computer graphics.”
Amid a torrent of positive reviews for “Star Wars: The Force Awakens,” which praise the film’s old-fashioned sense of adventure, a handful of critics have complained it is a thinly disguised recycling of the original “Star Wars” movies.
In that vein, The Vatican’s newspaper agrees, calling the film “more reboot than sequel.” For good measure it adds, “Not a classy reboot however, like Nolan’s Batman, but an update twisted to suit today’s tastes and a public more accustomed to sitting in front of a computer than in a cinema.”
Sticking the knife in further, the review adds, “Abrams’ direction is in fact modelled on the sloppiest current action films derived from the world of videogames.”
“The only merit of J.J. Abrams film is to show, by contrast, how the direction of the previous films was elegant, balanced and above all appropriate.”
L’Osservatore Romano, has first published in 1861, has built a name for lively film reviews since its editor was told to spice up the paper in 2007 by then-Pope Benedict.
Not all its film reviews are as tough as the one on the new “Star Wars” installment. In 2012, the paper raved about the 007 film “Skyfall,” even lauding the “extremely beautiful Bond girls.”
This year, it described futuristic road movie “Mad Max, Fury Road” as “a real, true masterpiece.” On the other hand, it slammed Ridley Scott’s “Exodus: Gods and Kings,” saying it added nothing new to the biblical story except a welter of special effects.
Kington is a special correspondent
More From the Los Angeles Times
-
Letters on the blackface issue and Jimmy Kimmel, Stanley Fish’s 1st Amendment views, Eurovision. And a “Law & Order” showrunner defends Dick Wolf.
-
The union representing film actors tells members not to work on the pandemic thriller ‘Songbird’ out of coronavirus concerns.
-
As a new adaptation of “The Baby-Sitters Club” hits Netflix, meet the five new actors who are bringing the characters from the beloved book series to life.
-
After nearly a year of talks, public radio station KCRW has agreed to its first pay deal in the latest in a wave of unionizations.
