Advertisement

Letters: Negotiating Mideast peace

Secretary of State John Kerry delivers remarks as Israeli Justice Minister Tzipi Livni (left) and Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat (right) listen during a news conference in Washington this week.
(Olivier Douliery / McClatchy-Tribune)
Share

Re “Israelis and Palestinians to confront tough issues,” July 31

It is disappointing that the United States continues to show unconditional support for Israel even when our ally violates international law and ignores U.N. resolutions condemning its behavior. From 1972 to 2011, the United States has issued the only vetoes to 42 U.N. Security Council resolutions condemning Israel’s behavior, most of which were related to the occupied territories.

These negotiations would be unnecessary if Israel would respect U.N. resolutions and the International Court of Justice concerning settlements, borders, the right of return, the separation barrier with much of the West Bank and the status of Jerusalem. All of these issues have been debated at length in these respected forums, and Israel would be required to relinquish all territory acquired by war and grant the right of return to the Palestinians who were forced or who fled from their homes in 1947 and 1967.

Advertisement

It is not surprising that Israel demands that these critical issues be resolved by negotiations instead of by international law, or else the ultra-nationalists in the Israeli government could not realize their dream of their country stretching from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean.

Joseph Tillotson

Redondo Beach

There will be no peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, but not because of Israeli settlements and not because the Gaza Strip is ruled by Hamas. Rather, it is because the Palestinians reject a two-state solution.

Consider the historical evidence. Israel repeatedly offered the Palestinians land for peace, only to be turned down. In 2009, Israel froze settlement construction for 10 months, but the Palestinians refused to return to the bargaining table.

The tactic is simple: Make outrageous demands that no reasonable person would accept, and when the demands are rejected, accuse the other side of obstruction.

Advertisement

I hope to be proved wrong this time.

Bruce Friedman

Los Angeles

ALSO:

Letters: The Zimmerman case and the law

Letters: The Fed’s Yellen-Summers horse race

Letters: Two weeks of therapy for Filner won’t do it

Advertisement
Advertisement