Editorial: Ignore Cruz and Trump — scapegoating Muslims is an un-American response to the Brussels attacks
It has been clear at least since the massacre in Paris last November that jihadist terrorists are embedded in Europe, difficult to detect and determined to engage in spectacular acts of violence. So while Tuesday’s carnage in Brussels was horrific, it also was achingly familiar. This time more than 30 people were killed and hundreds injured in separate attacks at the Brussels airport and at a downtown subway close to the headquarters of the European Union. Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attacks.
While condemnations come easy, a strategy for preventing such outrages is elusive. It does seem that Belgian intelligence and law enforcement have been overmatched. It was only last Friday that authorities captured Salah Abdeslam, a suspect in the Paris attacks who was living in Brussels and reportedly planning further attacks. Obviously European governments need to cooperate more on identifying and uprooting terrorists in their countries.
Obama vowed Tuesday to “do whatever is necessary to support our friend and ally Belgium in bringing to justice those who are responsible.”
Some of those who would succeed Obama have other ideas about how the U.S. should respond to this and other terrorist attacks — ugly ideas. Donald Trump, who has proposed a moratorium on Muslims entering the U.S., said Tuesday that “at this point we cannot allow these people to come into the country.” Sen. Ted Cruz said the U.S. should “immediately halt the flow of refugees from countries with a significant Al Qaeda or ISIS presence,” adding: “We need to empower law enforcement to patrol and secure Muslim neighborhoods before they become radicalized.”
A cure for the common opinion
Get thought-provoking perspectives with our weekly newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.