Advertisement

Gov. Jerry Brown’s plan to reform pensions; Occupy L.A.’s threat to the City Hall lawn; Rick Perry’s flat-tax idea

Share

Salary nonsense

Re “Mayor’s ex-aide still on payroll,” Oct. 29

It’s nice to see that our illustrious mayor has his priorities in order by allowing his former chief of staff to draw his $194,000 salary even though someone else has been hired to replace him. The ex-staffer is being compensated for installing security fences around Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s city-owned mansion and improving the city’s golf courses, among other things.

Advertisement

We need money for schools, our teachers are being laid off and the poor have little access to medical care, so this should go down as one of Villaraigosa’s great achievements.

A pox on his mansion.

Robert C. Thompson

Marina del Rey

Tilting at pension reform

Re “Brown risks backlash on pension plan,” Oct. 28

I have been no fan of Gov. Jerry Brown, but I fully support his attempt to reform public employee pensions in California, even though I realize he is faced with a Hobson’s choice of the first order.

Advertisement

To those who don’t think this plan can work, look at what the federal government did nearly 25 years ago in moving from the unsustainable Civil Service Retirement System to the fiscally sound Federal Employees Retirement System. It resembles what Brown is trying to do today.

Noteworthy is the fact that the feds kept every promise made to their employees. Brown can do the same, and that should certainly be enough.

Larry Hawthorne

Hemet

I will not tolerate addressing the budget crisis by slashing the pensions and benefits of public employees. Substituting one crisis for another is not leadership. Decimating retirement for thousands and forcing employees to contribute more now reduces consumer spending, which is a proven component of economic depression.

The penny-wise but pound-foolish proposal promoted by Brown fails to address the underlying cause of the poor economy and the state budget gap: theft by the big banks.

Advertisement

I will not vote for politicians who erode my quality of life under the guise of austerity. It’s time we work to change the balance of power. I will never give up because everything is at stake.

Jody Schwimmer

La Quinta

Someone, please pinch me! I think I am dreaming.

Is it really true that Brown has stepped up to the plate as a bona-fide pragmatist with an actual, realistic plan to rein in the pension systems? Is he really ready to risk his relationship with the same groups that helped him get elected?

Hell hath no fury like a union scorned.

Robert M. Imm

Sunland

Advertisement

City Hall’s lawn isn’t the problem

Re “Ending the occupation,” Editorial, Oct. 28

People are losing their livelihoods, paying 10 times more for public universities than their parents did and mortgaging their futures to pay for it, all with ever-diminishing hopes of getting a job when they graduate.

And the The Times’ editorial board is concerned about resodding the City Hall lawn at taxpayers’ expense?

The people camping outside City Hall are taxpayers. They don’t seem too troubled by the extra expenditures when weighed against the opportunity to actually be heard regarding the structuring of the far-greater expenditures lavished on the multimillion-dollar business interests they are protesting.

But I’d forgotten: Those monied interests treat mayors, councilmen and supervisors to expensive lunches.

Advertisement

George Levin

Ojai

According to the editorial, protesters who are camping outside City Hall are “killing the lawn in one of downtown’s rare green spaces, which will have to be replaced at taxpayers’ expense, and they may be damaging City Hall’s magnificent fig trees.” How bloody awful!

But I seem to remember that corporations are, and have been for a very long time, desecrating the environment in many parts of the world. I am disappointed, therefore, that The Times should focus on a minor desecration done by people who have dedicated themselves to building a better world.

Dan D’Amelio

Yucaipa

Advertisement

Straight talk on flat taxes

Re “Perry’s tax idea may fall flat,” Opinion, Oct. 28

Under Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s plan, we might end up computing taxes three ways: for regular income taxes, alternative minimum taxes and then Perry’s flat taxes. Under Perry’s plan, annual tax receipts would decline substantially faster than what has been experienced in the last few years.

Flat-tax advocates are silent on an important fact: The tax code is generally used by Congress as a tool to stimulate and monitor the nation’s economy and various segments of different industries and professions. Taxes and the economy are interrelated.

Nanda Senathi

Redondo Beach

The European country of Slovakia has had a flat tax rate of 19% since 2004. Since its inception, this simple tax system has succeeded in providing adequate revenue to the state along with an increase in the country’s gross domestic product and the standard of living for the country’s 5.4 million people.

Advertisement

Flat-tax systems also exist in several other small nations in eastern Europe and Asia. The time may be ripe to reconsider developing a simplified tax system similar to the successful Slovakian model.

David Covell

Altadena

Wal-Mart’s woes

Re “Latest sign of a sick healthcare system,” Column, Oct. 28

Wal-Mart spokesman Greg Rossiter’s comment that his company has no choice but to reduce its healthcare coverage for its employees would be laughable if it weren’t so tragic.

Advertisement

Upon reading the article, I couldn’t help but recall that when Wal-Mart heir John Walton died in a plane crash in 2005, his personal fortune was estimated by Forbes at about $18 billion, similar to his siblings’. If Wal-Mart is truly “making choices we wish we didn’t have to make,” how about asking each of the family members to kick in a few billion dollars to cover the costs?

I know times are tight, but couldn’t they get by on, say, $12 billion each?

Stephen Bulka

Los Angeles

Photo flap

Re “Lawsuit filed over photos,” Oct. 28

I’d be most curious to learn how much it’s costing us to have the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department hassle those taking photographs in public places in the name of homeland security.

Advertisement

Hasn’t it occurred to deputies that would-be terrorists could easily use hidden cameras? How likely is it that they would call attention to themselves by displaying regular photographic equipment? Is this really the best use of our law enforcement groups?

Well, just in case I see a person wielding a camera in a suspicious area — for example, City Hall — I’ll be sure to call 911.

Bill Robbins

Los Angeles

History for all

Re “Yosemite on the trail to diversity,” Oct. 30

Advertisement

Regarding the Yosemite tour guide who was so dismissive to the African American ladies who wanted to hear about the Buffalo Soldiers’ contributions to the park: African Americans are not the only ones wanting to learn about the Buffalo Soldiers.

I am a white Mayflower descendant (four times over) who was married in Yosemite and visits the park frequently. People like me want (and need) to learn more about the Buffalo Soldiers too.

We should not whitewash history or disrespect park visitors.

Gail Wise

Los Angeles

Advertisement