How state and local government budgets will be affected by CalPERS’ trimmed investment expectations

CalPERS directors voted on Wednesday to lower the pension fund's official investment returns over the next three years.
(Carl Costas / For The Times)

In the four years since California’s largest pension fund recalibrated its investment projections, the annual contribution from state and local governments — in effect, the money paid by taxpayers — has slowly been on the rise.

By the summer of next year, the pace of those payments will quicken, as the California Public Employees’ Retirement System throttles back the expectations of profits earned on its $300-billion portfolio.


Those expectations were officially made more conservative on Wednesday by CalPERS’ board of directors, a half-percentage-point decrease in assumed returns over three years that will send shock waves through all sectors of state and local governments faced with billions of dollars in new pension costs.

Even so, those higher contributions could add some long-term strength to a government employee retirement program that has fallen deeper into the danger zone in recent years.

“This will make for a more sustainable system,” Gov. Jerry Brown said in a statement after the pension board’s vote.

The final approval for shrinking CalPERS’ official rate of investment profit, from its current 7.5% to 7%, came one day after the proposal was vetted and recommended by the board of directors’ investment committee, putting in place the mechanism to shrink CalPERS’ expectations to its lowest rate in modern history.

An in-depth look at California’s pension crisis »

“This is very monumental for the organization,” said Richard Costigan, the CalPERS board member whose finance committee vetted the proposal.

It was a decision some members of the pension board, most notably those from the ranks of public employee unions, have resisted. Other board members said it was simply a matter of the math for CalPERS, the biggest public employee pension fund in the nation.

That was best seen in Wednesday’s report by the fund’s chief investment officer that actual investment returns over the last 20 years have averaged only 6.9%, and returns for the current fiscal year are a paltry 2.3%.

The impacts will first be felt in the state budget, which already makes annual payments of $5.4 billion a year into the CalPERS fund. While local governments and schools won’t have to boost their pension contributions until 2018, the state budget will begin to feel the effects of the CalPERS decision in almost six months.

Pension fund leaders were told on Tuesday that Brown, who will unveil his new state budget in less than three weeks, believes the ratcheting down of CalPERS’ investment profits will force the state to pay an additional $2 billion above current pension mandates by the summer of 2024.

“These costs have very real and significant budget pressures,” Eric Stern, a pension adviser to Brown, said in testimony on Tuesday.

With only three real sources of money — investment returns, government funds and government worker contributions — to make up billions of dollars in long-term pension shortfalls, the admission by CalPERS of weaker portfolio profits will have a domino effect in communities across California.

Government workers hired before the state’s 2012 pension overhaul could be asked to set aside more for their pensions in their paychecks through future collective bargaining. Workers hired after the 2012 changes, though, will have to automatically pay more.

So, too, will local governments, which made $4.4 billion in CalPERS payments in the most recently completed fiscal year.

“We believe it’s a step in the right direction, in spite of the strains it will put on our budgets,” said Dane Hutchings of the League of California Cities.

Even so, those dollars are now being diverted in some cases from local public services and law enforcement. In Sacramento, fire and police department positions remain vacant due to a lack of dollars.

“This change will obviously be very difficult for us, and this will continue our inability to fill those positions,” Sacramento city finance director Phil Wright said in testimony to pension board members.

School workers, such as custodians and maintenance workers, are also promised pensions paid through CalPERS. Dennis Meyers of the California School Boards Assn. told officials on Tuesday the rate change could add $500 million a year to school pension payments.

“That is money off the table, and it’s money that’s not being able to be used to decrease achievement gaps, or buy textbooks or technology, or all of those things we need to do to move our student population forward,” Meyers said.

Any objections by CalPERS directors to the new conservative investment assumptions were largely absent this week, a shift from strong critiques made last month by those who represent public employee labor unions.

The only labor criticism this week came from Jai Sookprasert, the assistant director of the California School Employees Assn., who told board members on Tuesday the action was “very aggressive” in light of current stock performance records being set on Wall Street.

One board member, J.J. Jelincic, abstained from supporting the plan because he said it was too small of a dose of reality for state and local governments. Jelincic said the kinds of investments CalPERS has made aren’t designed to yield a 7% return, the new lower projection.

“I think the number is too high,” he said in an interview on Wednesday. “I think it was more a political decision to aid [government] employers.”

Follow @johnmyers on Twitter, sign up for our daily Essential Politics newsletter and listen to the weekly California Politics Podcast


Political Road Map: The long, cold winter is coming for California pensions

CalPERS widens its ban on tobacco related invesments

Updates on California politics