Trump boasts about his cognitive testing. Biden asks: ‘Why the hell would I take a test?’
Joe Biden is pushing back at Republican assertions that he should take a cognitive test to disprove President Trump’s claim that the Democrat isn’t fit for the Oval Office.
Biden grew testy when CBS News correspondent Errol Barnett asked the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee about the matter in a recent interview.
“No, I haven’t taken a test. Why the hell would I take a test?” Biden said.
He then told Barnett: “That’s like saying … before you got on this program, you’re taking a test whether you’re taking cocaine or not. What do you think? Huh? Are you a junkie?”
The former vice president, who is 77, also tried to turn the matter back around on the 74-year-old president in the latest jousting over the two men’s fitness for office.
“Well, if he can’t figure out the difference between an elephant and a lion, I don’t know what the hell he’s talking about,” Biden said, appearing to refer to Trump’s repeated public discussions about his performance in clinical examinations that physicians often give older patients to identify early signs of dementia. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, which a White House doctor said he administered to Trump in 2018, includes a version that ask patients to identify animals, including a lion, rhino and camel.
Biden’s exchange with Barnett was part of an interview conducted with the National Assn. of Black Journalists and the National Assn. of Hispanic Journalists. It was scheduled to air in full on Thursday.
In a recent interview with Chris Wallace of Fox News, Trump hailed his own mental acuity by referencing his recent examinations. Trump framed his results as a sign of intellectual prowess. He recalled in another Fox News interview that he successfully repeated back to a physician a series of words he’d been given audibly: “Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.”
Trump and his allies have repeatedly raised questions about whether Biden has been administered such an examination.
Biden told reporters in June that he is “constantly tested” by the rigors of the presidential campaign and said he’s eager to match wits against Trump in fall debates. He repeated those sentiments with Barnett.
“I’m so forward-looking to have an opportunity to sit with the president or stand with the president and the debates,” Biden said. He later said he was “very willing to let the American public judge my physical, mental — my physical, as well as my mental fitness and to, you know, to make a judgment about who I am.”
Allies of both Trump and Biden often seize on the other’s verbal slips. Both men have provided enough material to generate widely shared video mashups of their mistakes. Biden’s third White House bid has drawn renewed attention on his lifelong struggle with stuttering.
Kathleen Hall Jamieson, a professor of political communication at the University of Pennsylvania, said voters and the media should try to discern whether presidential candidates have the reasoning skills and temperament to handle the job. But she cautioned against using verbal inaccuracies to make a decision.
“You don’t always know what that means,” Jamieson said, adding that biases about age can influence how voters and media treat an older candidate’s syntax. “But you do know when you have an exchange in real time whether a person can handle the questions and answers and as a result is able to function” in the White House.
“Some cues don’t really say anything about governance,” Jamieson said. “If you can’t focus, that’s a problem. If you can’t provide a coherent answer, that’s a problem. [But] sometimes what you’re seeing, it may be annoying, but it doesn’t speak to a person’s capacity to govern.”
Get Group Therapy
Life is stressful. Our weekly mental wellness newsletter can help.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.