OpinionEditorial
Editorial

Is bilingual education worth bringing back?

OpinionEditorialsLaws and LegislationRicardo Lara
California reconsiders bilingual education
Prop. 227 ended it in California, but there are several good reasons to reconsider bilingual education

A lot has changed since 1998, when Proposition 227 all but wiped out bilingual instruction in California public schools. The matter is due for reconsideration; a bill that passed the state Senate last week would allow that to happen.

SB 1174, by state Sen. Ricardo Lara (D-Bell Gardens), would place a measure on the November 2016 ballot to repeal Proposition 227 and allow local school districts to decide whether they want to bring back bilingual education rather than continue with the current system, which aims to move students toward full-time English use as quickly as possible.

Over the last 16 years, academic research has largely found that good bilingual programs are just as effective at teaching English skills, and often slightly better at it, than classes that immerse students in English. Along the way, they also teach students literacy in their native language.

Another reason to consider bilingual education: Shortly after Proposition 227 passed, testing and accountability requirements were imposed on schools. The academic skills of students, including those who aren't fluent in English, are now measured every year. That means that if bilingual education is failing students, that failure will become clear quickly, and schools will face potential disciplinary measures if they don't fix the problem.

A third factor: The globalization of the economy means that bilingualism confers a significant advantage in the work world.

Yet there were good reasons Proposition 227 passed. Bilingual education is more expensive. The state suffered continual shortages of qualified bilingual teachers. Worse, bilingual education was often poorly done. It's important to consider the academic studies that have shown slightly better results for bilingual classes, but remember that those studies involved top-notch programs with outstanding teachers. California's public schools seldom came close to the model, and before Proposition 227, thousands of students were handed diplomas without ever having mastered English.

To persuade voters, supporters of bilingual education will have to demonstrate that they can overcome these obstacles.

Dual immersion programs, a subset of bilingual education in which students from different language backgrounds study in two languages, gaining fluency in both, have often succeeded and are increasingly popular. Such programs exist in California, but they have been small and have involved populations of motivated parents and students. Bringing them up to scale so that they work statewide might be difficult.

These are debates worth having, and SB 1174 would provide the forum for them.

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
OpinionEditorialsLaws and LegislationRicardo Lara
  • Should California reinstate bilingual education?
    Should California reinstate bilingual education?

    If the name “Ron Unz” is ringing bells in your brain, it may be because of his initiative to raise California’s minimum wage to $12 an hour.

  • How activist judges increase your taxes
    How activist judges increase your taxes

    In 1977, writing in the Harvard Law Review, Supreme Court Justice William Brennan Jr. exhorted state judges to embrace activist interpretations of the law. The high court had taken a frustratingly conservative turn, Brennan noted. He encouraged state judges to find in state constitutions and...

  • Steinberg's preschool bill: It's still too ambitious
    Steinberg's preschool bill: It's still too ambitious

    A too-costly bill that would have provided preschool for all California 4-year-olds has been slimmed down in useful ways. There is much to admire in Senate Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg's (D-Sacramento) SB 837, which would give low-income families the option of placing their children in either...

  • Congress' assignment: school reform. Why not start with No Child Left Behind?
    Congress' assignment: school reform. Why not start with No Child Left Behind?

    Congress is taking up a large number of education bills this year. Unfortunately, the issue it is ignoring — as it has for years — is the one that most needs its attention: an overhaul of the No Child Left Behind Act. It would be an understatement to say that school reform is in...

  • L.A. Unified School District doesn't need more iPad yes men
    L.A. Unified School District doesn't need more iPad yes men

    The Los Angeles Unified School District needs more independent-minded people who question its initiatives, not fewer. The school board made a mistake with its refusal to reappoint a member of the Bond Oversight Committee who had opposed the use of bond funds to pay for iPads for every student.

  • To combat truancy, California should follow Compton's lead
    To combat truancy, California should follow Compton's lead

    How to improve California's education system is a challenge that has long divided state and local elected officials, education advocates, teachers and parents. One thing is certain, however: No solution to our schools' problems will make an ounce of difference if students are out on...

  • To achieve the American dream, mind the opportunity gap
    To achieve the American dream, mind the opportunity gap

    Ever since the financial crash of 2008, we've been having an anxious national debate about the growing income gap. What does it mean for American society when most workers' wages are flat and almost all economic gains flow to the top 1% — or to the top one-tenth of 1%?

  • Casting doubt on linking teacher evaluations to test scores
    Casting doubt on linking teacher evaluations to test scores

    A new study out of USC and the University of Pennsylvania finds that value-added measurements — a way of using student test scores to evaluate teacher performance — aren't a very good way of judging teacher quality. This isn't the first study to cast doubt on what has...

Comments
Loading