Advertisement

D.A. Must Weigh Fate of Boy Who Killed on Joy Ride

Share
Times Staff Writer

A lot of children’s and adolescents’ cases go through the district attorney’s office at Orange County Juvenile Court, said Deputy Dist. Atty. Cheryl Bedsworth. “Ten thousand a year. It’s amazing.”

Fullerton police expect to bring in another next week, the case of an 11-year-old Garden Grove boy who took his parents’ 24-foot motor home for a joy ride Tuesday and wound up killing a 72-year-old woman.

“We get 11-year-olds joy riding all the time,” Bedsworth said. “Usually they crash into a tree or a wall, and that’s how they get caught.”

Advertisement

But Fullerton’s joy rider crashed broadside into a car carrying Margaret D. Rooney of Fullerton, who died four hours later. Now a legal system that more frequently handles 11-year-olds as shoplifters, thieves or burglars will be asked to handle one who killed.

Should he be treated as a killer? No one seems eager to decide that question.

“Fortunately for us, I guess, we don’t have to make the final decision,” said Fullerton Police Sgt. Al Burks, whose traffic bureau is investigating the fatal crash.

“Once we wrap up our investigation, we’ll present it to the district attorney’s office for review. If they determine a prosecution is warranted, then we’re there to answer whatever questions they might have.

“Frankly, we don’t know what they’ll do. We’ve never had one this young.”

John D. Conley, supervisor of the D.A.’s Juvenile Court prosecutors, is no stranger to young criminals. “To have a young kid involved in a crime is not unusual,” he said. “To have a loss of human life involved is very unusual.”

The question of how to handle the case may not require a discretionary decision.

Under state law, a child less than 14 years old cannot be convicted of a crime unless it is proved that the child knew he was doing something wrong.

Exercise Discretion?

But if the proof is there, Conley said, it opens the door to a more difficult question: “Should we exercise the discretion we have as prosecutors not to (prosecute)?”

County Probation Department statistics show that children 11 or younger make up a very small percentage of those accused in juvenile criminal cases in Orange County.

Advertisement

In 1985, for example, 17,951 children and adolescents were arrested in Orange County, but only 275, about 1.5%, were 11 years old or younger.

Only 84 of them, about 0.5%, were arrested for felonies, mostly burglaries. Two robberies and one weapons violation were listed. There were no crimes involving death.

“Unless it’s a serious crime like this, elementary school administrators try to handle things on that level,” said Fullerton Police Sgt. Wage Richmond, who specializes in juvenile cases.

“Police involvement at that stage is seldom necessary. . . . We’ve had them this young periodically--in here for fighting and disrupting school and being incorrigible. But nothing this heavy, no.”

Burks said that if an adult had been at the wheel of the motor home, “there wouldn’t be as much doubt about prosecution.”

Mitigating Circumstances

But with an 11-year-old suspect, investigators encounter possible mitigating circumstances at every turn.

Advertisement

“The impression I get was the young man was somewhat frustrated, probably with problems at school, and wanted to get out and get away from things,” Burks said. “He’s not a juvenile delinquent type. He’s been very cooperative. It’s not like he’s a problem child.

“He seemed like an average-looking kid, not one you’d describe as the radical type, long hair, whatever. He was well dressed. It would be hard to pick him out of a group of his peers.”

Burks said that a relative of the victim called the police station and during the conversation remarked that “they felt sorry for the young man and all he’ll have to go through.”

Burks said there are no firm guidelines for police dealing with children that young. “If they’re under 14, we have to evaluate them on a case-by-case basis,” he said.

So does the D.A., Conley said. One 10-year-old boy who sodomized two five-year-olds was prosecuted, convicted and confined, he said.

But a 12-year-old arrested for burglary was treated instead as a petty thief, Bedsworth said. He admitted going through the unlocked back door of a neighbor’s house to steal something and wound up stealing a bag of corn chips lying on a counter.

Advertisement

Tough Prosecutors

Bedsworth said she used the facts of the case as an exercise during last month’s California District Attorney’s Assn. juvenile justice seminar in Palm Springs. She asked prosecutors from around California how they would treat the case.

“I found a lot of the ones from the northern counties were a lot more--I don’t want to use the word redneck--but hard-charging. They wanted to file for burglary, which is a felony.

“They wanted to consider mitigating aspects at the sentencing stage. We tend to consider them more at the time of filing (a charge). It might be a function of the fact that we have a lot more cases than a lot of them do.

“But for crying out loud, the kid’s 12 years old and it’s a bag of Fritos. It’s not like he’s selling VCRs to support his drug habit.”

Did the 11-year-old know he was doing something wrong when he took his parents’ motor home, cruised for “most of the afternoon,” then, with a police car flashing its lights and honking at him, lost control and rammed the Rooney car?

“That’s the twist,” Conley said. “In this kind of case, the awareness of the child is sometimes the decisive factor.”

Advertisement
Advertisement