Advertisement

How the Rating Sweeps Play in Iowa

Share

Yes, it’s that time of year again, time for people here to pick their favorites.

Dole or Bush? Gephardt, Dukakis or Simon?

Wrong candidates, wrong race.

The candidates in this race are “News Center 6,” “Active 8 News” and “Channel 4 News.” They’re “Wheel of Fortune,” “A Current Affair,” reruns of “Family Ties” and much, much more.

This vote is not for presidential preferences as part of today’s state caucuses. It’s for TV programs, in a different kind of balloting.

The February ratings sweeps.

If anything, ratings sweeps months may be more critical in this area known as the Quad Cities--consisting of Davenport and Bettendorf, Iowa, and Moline and Rock Island, Ill.--than in Los Angeles and other enormous metropolises where TV ratings are counted daily.

Advertisement

In this middle-sized, economically depressed and largely blue-collar market of 350,000--the nation’s 77th largest--ratings are compiled only in November, February, May and July. And July is deemed largely insignificant because of the fluctuating audience levels in summer.

There are four commercial stations in the Quad Cities, where a top news anchor reportedly commands $60,000 to $70,000 a year--compared to the $500,000-plus salaries in Los Angeles.

Davenport’s KWQC, an NBC affiliate, is dominant. ABC affiliate WQAD in Moline and CBS station WHBF in Rock Island trail KWQC badly in this community split by the Mississippi River, and are seeking to narrow the gap by attracting more Iowa viewers. The relatively new independent station, KLJB in Davenport, is barely a hiccup in the ratings.

Comparing TV’s sweeps atmosphere here with Los Angeles is like comparing Gary Cooper to Don Rickles.

“I remember lots of ads hyping sensational kinds of things,” WQAD general manager H. Oliver Gillespie, a slow-talking Kentuckian who once taught communications in college, said about his visits to Los Angeles in sweeps periods.

For one thing, stations here don’t have the budgets or staffs to trumpet and carry on as big-market stations do. For another, a different philosophy seems to prevail.

Advertisement

“Chicago and Los Angeles stations will sensationalize minidocs for sweeps, and that just doesn’t happen here at any station,” said Bob Hoffman, the chain-smoking WHBF general manager who previously was sales manager of a televison station in Chicago, where sweeps mania regularly eclipses sanity. “I think that viewers are too smart for that sort of thing and that stations in Chicago and Los Angeles don’t give them enough credit.”

Not that the competitive-minded stations here are dozing while two firms, Arbitron and the A. C. Nielsen Co., measure their February ratings. The profit motive is alive here too and WQAD’s Gillespie estimates the worth of a single Quad Cities rating point at $15,000--no small sum in a market this size.

Consequently, as the temperatures outside plunge below zero, the sweeps temperatures steadily rise.

KWQC employs “every conceivable way we can think of to get viewers to watch in sweeps,” said bearded station manager Joe Lentz, who less than two years ago was the station’s sales manager.

Here you find only a hint of the shrieking newspaper ads for sweeps programming a la Los Angeles. Yet more than half the promotion budgets of KWQC and WQAD go toward sweeps months, and Hoffman says that his entire $300,000 promotion budget at WHBF is applied to these ratings periods.

What gets promoted?

Of the three largest stations, only KWQC gives much effort to the traditional sweeps series in news, which are either too comical to be heeded or too awful to be comical.

Advertisement

Although Lentz says that he and news director Steve Tuttle make the decisions on sweeps series, KWQC employs news consultant Frank Magid to advise it on everything from programming to talent.

There are some constants from market to market. On Friday, for example, anchorwoman Paula Sands concluded her three-part series on “What’s Hot and What’s Not” (go ahead and snicker), which should sound familiar to Los Angeles viewers. Also ready to air this month are “The Class of 2000”--about prospective high school grads at the turn of the century--and “Unsolved Mysteries,” more sweeps deja vu for Southern Californians.

“These are obviously designed to keep people watching,” Lentz said. Obviously.

In a more serious vein, KWQC is also doing two series on AIDS and repeating another that encourages viewers to have their cholesterol tested.

About 20,000 viewers responded last year, Lentz said. “It’s been done by stations elsewhere, but it’s important to be first in the market.”

If such series are in the public interest, why not do them year- round instead of only when ratings are at stake?

“I’d like to get into that,” said news director Tuttle. “But we’re not CBS News. We don’t have that kind of manpower.” Adds Lentz: “That’s not to say we lie down and do nothing the rest of the year.”

But are those people at KWQC cuties or not? They have made some big plans for the May sweeps concerning the station’s popular “5 P.M. Live” quasi-news program.

Advertisement

“We were thinking of ways to create a real big image in people’s minds for May,” Lentz said. “We came up with an idea that’s not new, but it’s new here. We will take ‘5 P.M. Live’ on the road for 19 days of the month in parts of our ADI (area of dominant influence). We will either attend an event or become the event. This will show people that we’re out and about. You can create a lot of public favor and interest that way.”

The plan may eliminate the need for May sweeps series in the station’s 30-minute “News Center 6” newscasts at 6 and 10 p.m.

“When the 5 p.m. program is on location, we will have them do live feeds at 6 o’clock on any number of things to tie in with the 6 o’clock newscast,” Lentz said.

Across the river in Moline, meanwhile, WQAD has scheduled only three sweeps series in its “Active 8” newscasts at 6 and 10 p.m. News director John Riches cited one: a sort of straight version of “Broadcast News” aimed at WQAD itself. “I saw someone do it in Ohio,” he said.

“John really does well covering local news, and that’s what people like to watch,” general manager Gillespie said. “We’re owned by the New York Times Co., which doesn’t put pressure on you to hype your news. They want to be No. 1, but it’s not the same kind of pressure you feel elsewhere.”

WQAD frequently rejects the advice it gets from its news consultant, Audience Research and Development, Gillespie said. “They tell us to do things like do stories on children. Health was another thing, and we did add ‘Health Beat’ to our news, but not just in sweeps.”

Advertisement

There are no sweeps series or consultant these days at WHBF in Rock Island, where Hoffman is reorganizing the station under new ownership in pursuit of a “youthful, energetic and dynamic image.”

A new anchor arrives in March, and Hoffman hopes ultimately to turn out a news series a month--throughout the year. “This news department needs to make that kind of statement to its viewers. And listen, I’ve been in this racket too long at WGN (in Chicago) not to understand that viewers know when you are doing cops and sex just for sweeps.”

The irony is that what lifted KWQC to absolute dominance in this market from merely being No. 1 is not its top-rated news or even its affiliation with high flying NBC, insists WQAD’s Gillespie. The difference appears to be--are you ready?--”Wheel of Fortune.”

Positioned at 6:30 nightly in the Central Time Zone, the astonishingly popular Vanna and Co. bridge local news and prime time, kicking dust in the faces of the competition.

“Look at this,” said Gillespie, producing a double-page newspaper ad from KWQC promoting “Wheel of Fortune” in blazing color. “Don’t get me wrong, we do the same thing; I believe that all’s fair in love and television, and I really look forward to sweeps. It’s like the box score at a game. You can learn a lot. But ads like this are all hype. If we had ratings 52 weeks a year, we wouldn’t have to do this thing.”

Stations outside the largest markets can’t afford to count their audiences daily, however. And even if they could, competitive pressures might lead them to follow the example of Los Angeles, where little is fair in love and television.

Advertisement
Advertisement