Enforcement of Water Rules
As a resident of neighboring Modjeska Canyon, I read with interest the article regarding the Porterville controversy (Feb. 28).
The issues are not “selective prosecution,” “blatant violation” or the existence of a “shantytown.” The issue is whether or not the greed and insensitivity of a public utility will displace 14 families.
Sam Porter is apparently a man who, out of compassion, has provided a haven for those less fortunate than himself. In nine years, no one has suffered as a result of their presence on his property.
All water being used is metered through Porter’s service, creating revenues for the Santa Ana Mountains County Water District. It seems that the district’s board of directors is more concerned with padding district coffers with $33,600 in connection fees than it is with the plight of those who would be left homeless.
To insist on enforcing the one-meter-per-household rule in this instance would be cold, heartless and a mistake.
There should be exceptions to every rule. In this case, one should be made.
JOHN WALKER
Orange
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
