Hall of Fame Line Already Is Forming for Next Year’s Vote

Now that Jim Palmer and Joe Morgan are officially in the Hall of Fame, the question becomes: Who’s next in line for baseball immortality?

The qualifications for a spot in Cooperstown have become a sticky subject lately. Some say that the standards have softened and that the game’s all-time greats just aren’t as great as they used to be.

The formation of a veterans committee has allowed players to sneak in who couldn’t get by the writers after 15 years.

The writers would prefer the veterans committee limit its selections to umpires, front office types and members of the Negro Leagues who were denied a shot at the major leagues.

Palmer won 268 games and made it in his first year of eligibility. Gaylord Perry totaled 314 victories (265 losses) and was squeezed out in his first two years on the ballot.

“Am I as good as Cy Young? Of course not. Am I as good as some of the pitchers in the Hall of Fame?” Palmer asked. “Probably not. But I would have voted for myself. It’s nice to be part of that ilk.”

Two years ago, Jim Bunning missed by four votes because nine writers left their ballots blank in a statement of some sort.

It was once thought that 300 victories was an automatic invitation to the Hall of Fame, along with 500 home runs, 3,000 hits and 3,000 strikeouts.

“Jim Palmer deserved to go to the Hall of Fame,” Perry said. “But looking at his record, some other people like Ferguson Jenkins and Jim Bunning should get in too.”

Perry staggered his way to 300 wins, bouncing from one team to another in an effort to hang on. There’s also the problem of his use of the grease ball. Some voters consider it a form of treason.

When the voting is announced in January, 1991, it seems likely Rod Carew will make it on his first try because of his 3,053 hits and .328 lifetime average.

Rollie Fingers, baseball’s all-time save leader with 341, will also appear on the ballot for the first time. His standing with the writers will be an indication of the chances for Bruce Sutter, Sparky Lyle and Rich Gossage.

Then there’s the guys who have come close the last few years like Perry, Jenkins (284-226, 3,192 strikeouts) and Bunning (224-184, no-hitters in each league).

“The Hall of Fame doesn’t mean as much to me now,” Perry said. “The first year I was really anticipating something. Now, it will be nice if I get in, but it’s not something I’m thinking about.”

If Perry fails the next couple of years, he may never get in because the field will be so strong for the rest of the decade.

On deck as potential Hall of Famers are Tom Seaver, Don Sutton, Steve Carlton, Nolan Ryan, Reggie Jackson, Mike Schmidt, Carlton Fisk, Tommy John, Gary Carter, Bert Blyleven, Ozzie Smith, Tony Perez, George Brett, Wade Boggs, Rickey Henderson, Robin Yount, Dale Murphy, Dave Winfield, Jim Rice, Bob Boone and Dave Parker.

It seems a lock that Seaver, Carlton, Ryan, Jackson, Schmidt, Fisk, Brett, Boggs and Henderson will make it on the first try when eligible.

Then, of course, there is Pete Rose. Until his banishment from baseball last August and jail sentence last month, baseball’s all-time hit leader figured to achieve one of the highest voting percentages in history when eligible in 1992, along with Seaver.

But several voting members of the Baseball Writers Assn. of America are undecided on whether Rose merits induction on his first try--if ever.

“He’s lost just about everything he’s had,” Morgan said. “The question is: Is he going to lose his Hall of Fame seat?

“It’s up to the writers to decide. I didn’t know how you voted until after I was voted in. Integrity, character, ability and contributions to the team. In a couple of those areas I don’t think there’s any question about Pete Rose. A couple you can question. The point is how much weight does each one carry.”