Advertisement

Merger of Investment Giants Collapses

Share
From Reuters

A deal that would have created the world’s largest investment bank collapsed Thursday when U.S. investment house Morgan Stanley Group Inc. and its British counterpart S.G. Warburg Group called off merger talks.

But analysts said the main sticking point in the $7.8-billion deal--how Warburg’s 75%-owned Mercury Asset Management Group would be treated--could be overcome.

“Remember, the two companies we’re talking about here are world leaders in (mergers and acquisitions). So they know all the negotiating tactics,” said Sanford Bernstein analyst Guy Moszkowski.

Advertisement

The proposed merger stumbled over the price demanded by the minority owners of Mercury, the jewel in the Warburg crown, according to analysts and a source close to the deal.

“The hang-up was the fairly high price tag attached to the minority interest in Mercury,” Moszkowski said.

That stake is largely owned by Mercury managers, and “they wanted to be bought out at a high multiple,” he said.

Under the proposed deal, Morgan Stanley would have ended up with two-thirds of the combined entity and Warburg with one-third. It would have merged the strongest London merchant bank with the old-line establishment firm of Morgan.

While Morgan would have given Warburg clients entree to the U.S. market, Warburg would have given Morgan an extensive shot at expanding its global business. Warburg’s client list includes more than half the companies listed on Britain’s Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 Index.

“While the discussions between Morgan Stanley and S.G. Warburg were proceeding on the basis of a market-for-market merger, the price and terms on which Mercury Asset Management Group indicated it would be willing to participate in the transaction were unacceptable to Morgan Stanley,” Morgan Stanley said. “For its part, Morgan Stanley was unwilling to proceed with a transaction excluding Mercury.”

Advertisement

Even before the talks were called off, the treatment of Mercury, and in particular the minority 25% holding, had been identified as a possible deal breaker.

It seemed likely that the British watchdog Panel on Takeovers and Mergers would have required an offer to be made for the minority holding on the grounds that Mercury was the main reason that the merger was taking place at all.

Analysts said that despite its excellent British and European client list, good market-making operations and high profile in corporate finance, Warburg’s investment banking operation is making no money and has serious problems.

Advertisement