Former Allies Riordan, Chick Now Clash on Police Issue

They came into politics three years ago with one common overriding goal: to beef up the beleaguered Los Angeles Police Department.

Mayor Richard Riordan took office, vowing to add 3,000 new officers by 1997. Councilwoman Laura Chick, a staunch police supporter, became head of the council’s Public Safety Committee last year, promising to modernize the department and reduce officer attrition.

It appeared that the two would form a tight alliance.

But in the past few months, the relationship between Riordan and Chick has instead become strained as they clashed over how to best implement their goals for the LAPD.

The hostility between the two is well-known throughout City Hall and some insiders fear that it may further jeopardize the cooperation needed between Riordan and the council to continue to strengthen the Police Department.

“It has gone beyond animosity,” said one council member, who asked not to be named.

Sources say that Riordan has privately referred to Chick as his “biggest enemy” in City Hall.

A recent series of letters to Chick’s West Valley constituents underscores the state of the relationship between the two.

A letter from Riordan blasted Chick for voting with a majority of the council to slow down his police expansion plan.

“Astoundingly, just last week, your council member, Laura Chick, joined several other council members by voting to slow down police expansion,” said the letter, which urged voters to pressure Chick to change her vote.

Chick responded this week with her own letter to constituents, accusing Riordan of trying to fund the expansion on “rosy assumptions, questionable borrowing, dubious financial transfers and unstable onetime monies.”

Although relations between the mayor and the entire council have been strained lately due to budget and personnel disputes, the relationship between Chick and Riordan is crucial because of the key positions they hold on police matters.

Chick and a Riordan spokeswoman insist that the tension will not hamper efforts to work together.

“The mayor has his eye on the goal and that is to make Los Angeles safer, and the mayor will do what it takes to reach that goal,” said Riordan spokeswoman Noelia Rodriguez.

For her part, Chick said the friction between her and the mayor has made it harder for her to do her job, particularly since Riordan sent letters to her constituents. But she vows not to let it hinder her work in City Hall.

“I understand that as part of my job I will have disagreements with the mayor and the other council members . . . and I accept that,” she said.

But, she added, “I’m distressed that he and I are not working as partners.”

Since taking office, Chick and Riordan have teamed up on several projects, including the building of a community theater in Canoga Park and the establishment of junior police academies for high school students interested in pursuing law enforcement careers.

But the relationship appeared to sour last year when Chick took over as head of the Public Safety Committee and began to question Riordan’s police expansion plan.

A month after becoming chair of the panel, she raised concerns about the pace of expansion, which adds about 80 recruits per month. She wondered whether Police Academy graduates were getting adequate supervision and on-the-job training once they were assigned patrol duties.

Riordan’s office shrugged off Chick’s concerns, saying quality was not being sacrificed for quantity.

In January, Chick questioned whether Riordan’s police expansion plan was too narrowly focused and suggested it be revised to include improvements to the crime lab, the 911 system and salary increases to stem attrition.

Although Riordan agreed that improvements were needed at some police facilities, he insisted that the expansion plan is only part of a larger blueprint for improving the department.

Most recently, Chick was a vocal critic and a key vote against Riordan’s latest budget proposal, which called for hiring 710 new officers with the help of a $53-million federal grant.

Chick, with a majority of the council, argued that some of the funding Riordan proposed for the expansion was questionable and that the federal grant would last only three years, forcing the city to find more than $100 million over the next five years to pay for those officers.

At the suggestion of Councilman Mike Feuer, the council majority voted instead to expand the department by only 460 officers next year and proposed putting a public safety tax on the November ballot to pay the additional officers Riordan wants.

Riordan blasted the council, saying: “This is not the type of government where every time there’s a tough decision you wimp out and go back to the public to make the decision.”

Riordan’s critical letter about Chick and a similar one sent to Councilwoman Rita Walters’ constituents were paid for from his officeholder contributions and were sent out a week after the council first voted to slow down the police expansion plan.

Riordan sent complimentary letters to the constituents of some of the council members who supported his plan.

Rodriguez referred all questions on the letters to Bill Wardlaw, a longtime Riordan advisor. Wardlaw has declined to disclose details of the mailing, but said it is the first of what will probably become a regular Riordan practice to communicate with constituents.

Despite her concerns about the expansion, Chick said she has remained a staunch police supporter. For example, she donated part of her salary to the department and led a drive to get private corporations to donate computers to police in the West Valley.

Chick said she has met with Riordan on several occasions in an attempt to mend the relationship, but has had little success. Sources said the two had a particularly bitter breakfast meeting a few weeks ago. It was then that Riordan called Chick his “biggest enemy” in City Hall.

Neither Chick nor Rodriguez would talk about what was said in those meetings. However, Chick said she and Riordan have been unable to communicate because she believes he is personally offended when she questions his police expansion plan.

“He seems to be saying that if I don’t sign on to his ideas of public safety, then I’m no friend of his,” Chick said. “If that is the price of friendship with the mayor, that is too high a price.”

Rodriguez said Riordan has not taken the disagreements personally.

“Before becoming mayor, and now, he has worked with people who have different opinions and different perspectives but share the same goal,” she said. “He will continue to do that,.”

Members of the council have already taken sides, with some lawmakers privately suggesting that Chick is criticizing Riordan to further her political career--a suggestion Chick rejects.

“This is so not about political ambition,” she said. “I will never run against Richard Riordan.”

Others say it is Riordan who is unwilling to listen to different opinions on police matters.

“A lot of it comes from Riordan taking it personally,” said Councilman Mark Ridley-Thomas, one of Riordan’s toughest critics on the council. “He seems to feel we are obliged to act as though we are his children or something.”

He suggested that, unless Riordan makes an effort to get along with the council, he will have trouble accomplishing his goals in City Hall.

Walters said the tensions between the mayor and the council were only worsened by the critical letters he sent.

Councilman Richard Alarcon, who voted for Riordan’s police expansion, said he was surprised by Chick’s vote against it, considering her history of supporting the police.

Police representatives said they are aware of the disputes between Riordan and Chick and hope that the friction does not hamper current negotiations to approve a police contract for the next four years.