Advertisement

Stories That Just Had to Be Told

Share
TIMES STAFF WRITER

Five documentary filmmakers are, it’s safe to say, breathing a sigh of relief, having made the final Oscar cut. Since recent quality films such as “Roger & Me,” “The Thin Blue Line,” “Crumb” and “Hoop Dreams” were bypassed, they were taking nothing for granted.

“I was frightened,” said Leon Gast, director of “When We Were Kings,” the critically acclaimed documentary about the 1974 Muhammad Ali-George Foreman heavyweight fight in Zaire. “Since a lot of my favorite films haven’t made it, the nomination is a victory in itself.”

Other than Gast’s, each of the documentaries focused on a single individual whose life, the directors were convinced, was worth years of theirs.

Advertisement

Rick Goldsmith started researching “Tell the Truth and Run: George Seldes and the American Press” in 1988 when his subject, the noted muckraker, was 97. Jo Menell approached Nelson Mandela about cooperating with “Mandela: Son of Africa, Father of a Nation” two years after the South African president’s 1990 release from prison; Anne Belle took five years to complete her portrait of the ballerina for “Suzanne Farrell: Elusive Muse.” And Susan Dryfoos, producer-director of “The Line King: The Al Hirschfeld Story,” interviewed the legendary caricaturist as far back as 1983.

“Hirschfeld started calling the project ‘The Dead Sea Scrolls’ because it was so long in the making,” recalls Dryfoos, director of the oral history program at the New York Times where the artist’s drawings appear. “Each question raised another. Each interview presented a new point of view. And Hirschfeld himself is a private man, not given to self-promotion or self-revelation. Though he’s keenly intelligent, he’s not analytical. Drawing is his language.”

Menell and co-director Angus Gibson faced a different challenge. Mandela’s greatest frustration was the media’s tendency to portray him as a “messiah or demigod,” he once said. One of his incentives in cooperating with this film, financed and distributed by Chris Blackwell’s Island Pictures, was to set the record straight. Mandela narrated much of it, taking the filmmakers to his childhood home and Robben Island--his prison for 27 years. Three hundred hours of interviews and archival footage had to be pared down to two.

*

“We got in so deep that we didn’t know which story we were telling--the one about 75 years of struggle and the demise of apartheid or the one about Mandela himself,” said Menell, a South African who worked for the BBC during the ‘70s and ‘80s since he was banned from working in his homeland. “We got our knickers in a twist because we were trying to say too much. Jonathan Demme, a producer on the film, told us to focus on the latter. On the wall we hung a sign reading ‘It’s about Mandela, stupid.’ ”

Belle, too, set out to humanize a legend--one she and co-director Deborah Dickson sought to portray as more than a “beautiful, porcelain, otherworldly figure.”

“This is both an artistic story and a love story,” said Belle, for whom this is the third in a trilogy of ballet-related films. “Farrell had an intensely close relationship--personal and professional--with Balanchine, who was 41 years her senior. When she married a younger dancer, he was devastated. Some reviews compared Farrell’s story to ‘The Red Shoes’--that classic about a ballerina who takes her life after being caught in a love triangle. While the parallels are there, this tale is less dramatic--thank goodness. Though Farrell considered suicide, it never came to that.”

Advertisement

George Seldes, a controversial foreign correspondent-turned-press-critic who died in 1995 at the age of 104, inspired activists from Ralph Nader to I.F. Stone. But when it came to raising money, Goldsmith says, that legacy didn’t help.

“The National Endowment for the Arts turned me down four times,” said the Berkeley-based director who is making his feature-length film debut. “They like famous names and--especially since America’s move to the right--people embraced by the mainstream. Still, since Seldes was nearly 90 then, I had no time to waste. Using generous contributions from friends, I interviewed him at home in Vermont. Seldes was very chatty but never thought it would amount to much.”

“When We Were Kings” started out as a concert film, a documentary of the “African Woodstock” preceding the bout with a little fight footage woven in. The thrust of the Gramercy Pictures movie changed when the fight was postponed six weeks--and, again, in 1994 when producer Taylor Hackford was brought in.

“Taylor told me to build up the fight scenes and bring the film into the ‘90s,” Gast said. “Differing approaches to race, everyone agreed, contributed to the drama. Foreman paraded with a flag after his 1968 Olympic victory. Ali called the Vietnam War immoral and refused to serve in the armed forces--that seems all the more impressive in this day and age when athletes are concerned more with sneaker contracts than with being role models.”

*

After years of immersion in controversy, these directors agree, the documentary committee of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences seems to be recruiting a younger, more diverse membership and mandating that each film be seen in its entirety. What irks some, however, is the rule requiring each entry to play a week in New York or L.A.

“If you took the 50 best documentary films of the past 10 years, you’d find that very few took that road to the public,” Goldsmith said. “It’s hard to find theater space and very expensive. Without a distributor, I lost money ‘four-walling’ a theater--renting it by myself.”

Advertisement

Even more controversial is the new academy rule prohibiting the broadcast of a documentary within six months of its theatrical play-date. The goal: to cut out the made-for-TV variety and whittle down the number of films.

“Everyone knows that documentary films are the hardest damn thing to finance--and the least likely to make money,” Menell says. “This is yet another obstacle to getting our investment back.”

Dryfoos agrees: “TV is one of the more logical sources of income--and deals are often cut upfront. Besides, what’s wrong with TV movies? A lot of them are very good.”

To complicate matters, members must have viewed all five documentaries before they can vote. That’s difficult for those living outside New York and L.A., where academy screenings are held. Gramercy recently offered to make 5,000-plus videotape copies of each nominated documentary and send them to members nationwide. That didn’t pan out since Seahorse Films, producers of the Farrell film, didn’t have a color-corrected video master or another quality print of the film.

“We’re in a terrible financial hole,” Belle said. “We’ve raised $600,000 but we need another $200,000 to get the movie out. And, with more of us out there and arts funding drying up, things are getting worse. Shooting a documentary is a labor of love.”

The overall picture, Gast agrees, is pretty grim. “Documentaries are still regarded as the ugly stepsister of the film business,” he says. “How many times was I told to go to PBS? My children were in grammar school when I started the film. I’m a grandfather now.”

Advertisement
Advertisement