Advertisement

Santa Paula Officials Learn Price of Service

Share
SPECIAL TO THE TIMES

Santa Paula City Councilman Don Johnson says he has learned the price of public service.

It’s $53,304.39.

That’s how much the former mayor and publisher of the town’s newspaper may end up paying to resolve a lawsuit against him.

The suit accused Johnson of violating conflict-of-interest laws by publishing advertising and legal notices for the city of Santa Paula while sitting on the council.

In October, Johnson voluntarily returned $37,953.19 to the city for ads placed after he joined the council in 1994. But that settlement wasn’t enough to appease his accusers, who also want him to pay $6,898.20 in interest on the ad money and half of their $16,906 in legal bills incurred in the lawsuit.

Advertisement

In February, “Friends of Don and Debbie Johnson” began pitching in to help the couple recoup their losses. The campaign, which has received free ads in the Johnsons’ Santa Paula Times, has raised more than $12,000 from 200-plus donors, Debbie Johnson said.

“People we don’t even know walk in this door” with checks, she said, calling the contributions “heartwarming.”

Money aside, the Johnsons and their supporters say the larger issue is whether the publisher-cum-councilman’s predicament will deter others from running for public office. In a small town like Santa Paula, many businesspeople have dealings with the city. Excluding them from holding office would deprive the voters of the best representation possible, they say.

But Johnson’s critics say he invited his problems by taking the ads. They also question how the man whose twice-weekly newspaper covers Santa Paula and its government can sit on the city’s council and remain impartial.

Johnson could give up his $300-a-month council seat and resume taking city money for ads. But he said he’s sure his resignation is exactly what his opponents want.

“Giving in to this would have been giving in to negative forces, and I just didn’t want to do that,” Johnson said. His paper is losing $4,000 to $6,000 annually by not accepting the city’s advertising, but, he said, “it’s more important for me to set a course for the future of the city for the next 20 years.”

Advertisement

Richard Francis, the Ventura attorney who handled the suit against Johnson, doesn’t have much pity for the councilman, his wife and what he calls their “oh-poor-me” ads soliciting contributions. He said Don Johnson knew that doing business with the city was illegal, and if he didn’t, any competent lawyer could have told him it was.

Specifically, Francis maintains, Johnson violated Government Code 1090, which prohibits politicians from profiting from city business.

Johnson said he was repeatedly told by the city attorney and other legal advisors that he had no reason to worry, so long as he abstained when the council voted whether to pay his newspaper’s bills.

“I got bad advice,” he said.

Johnson predicts that because of his situation, fewer people in the farm town of 28,000 will step forward to run for office.

“You can’t even own a hardware store, because you might have to sell the nuts and bolts to the city somewhere,” Johnson said.

Francis and plaintiff John Stockdill are still pursuing a conflict-of-interest suit against current Santa Paula Mayor Jim Garfield, a real estate broker whom they accuse of profiting from council land-use decisions. That case is scheduled to go to trial in June.

Advertisement

In a county where most elected positions are part-time, officials often find that their day jobs prevent them from making certain decisions. Recently, Moorpark Councilwoman Debbie Teasley, a real estate broker, recused herself from votes on the Hidden Creek Ranch development. Francis, a former Ventura mayor, said he often abstained from votes on the city’s redevelopment area because he owned property there.

Kay Wilson-Bolton, a former Santa Paula councilwoman who is leading the “Friends of Don and Debbie Johnson” effort, said that if elected officials avoided every possible conflict, potential candidates from many professions--including her own, real estate--would be excluded from the council.

“There’s tremendous value that professionals bring, no matter what profession they’re in,” Wilson-Bolton said. “It’s just a tremendous pool of information, and to sacrifice that could mean an inferior end product.”

The sad lesson from Johnson’s situation, Wilson-Bolton said, is: “Do not even consider public service unless you’re willing to divest yourself of your livelihood.”

The city had advertised with Johnson’s Santa Paula Times since he and his wife, its advertising manager, started the paper in 1993. For more than a century before that, the Santa Paula Chronicle, which folded in 1992, had published the city’s advertising.

Both papers’ low advertising rates and their reach in the community made them the logical places for the city’s legal notices, help-wanted ads and other announcements, said Johnson, who was the Chronicle’s publisher before its closing.

Advertisement

“I never solicited the legal notices . . . or any advertising,” said Johnson, a 20-year Santa Paula resident. “The city just placed them.”

Now, because of Johnson’s potential conflict of interest, he cannot provide even free advertising to the city. Unable to use the smaller local paper, the city is paying several times more to advertise in other newspapers. Johnson’s paper is delivered free to 9,000 homes on Wednesdays, and to 2,000 paid subscribers on Fridays.

“The Santa Paula Times has done a lot of things for us for free that have benefited the community, and it’s unfortunate that we have lost that opportunity,” City Administrator Peter Cosentini said.

Neither Francis nor Stockdill has seen any evidence that Johnson solicited the city’s advertising or that his position as a councilman brought him any more advertising revenue than before he was sworn in. But, Francis said, “Conflicts of interest are conflicts of interest.”

Francis said his lawsuit brought to light an illegal “feeding at the trough” that is common in small towns across the country.

“I think the rules are well founded,” he said. “They help protect the foundations of democracy, and I don’t think we should have exceptions because a town is so small.”

Advertisement

Defending the city of Santa Paula, Johnson and Garfield in the lawsuits has cost the city’s liability insurance almost $90,000. The bulk of the legal fees came after Johnson’s voluntary repayment to the city in October, after which Francis continued to push for payment of interest on the ad money and the plaintiff’s legal fees.

Advertisement