Advertisement

Anaheim Police Criticized for Enforcing ID Ordinance

Share
TIMES STAFF WRITER

Anaheim police are under fire for requiring bartenders, janitors and other employees of alcohol-selling establishments to carry city-issued identification cards, as well as providing officers with fingerprints and other information.

A city ordinance requiring the ID cards has been on the books since 1965. But police officials said an influx of jobs--many related to Disney’s resort expansion--has prompted them to “re-educate” businesses about the rules.

The ordinance requires employees to complete application forms that ask about their citizenship and arrest histories and whether they have any marks or scars. Employees are also fingerprinted and photographed at the police department.

Advertisement

Police said the information will simply be kept on file in case it is needed as part of a criminal investigation.

“Right now, it is our belief that the ordinance is legal and constitutional, but the city attorney’s office is reviewing it to look into whatever issues are being expressed,” Sgt. Rick Martinez said.

Union officials said they didn’t know about the law until a few weeks ago, when they began getting complaints from workers who decried the requirements as unfair and a violation of their rights.

“Why do we need an ID card to sell a glass of chardonnay?” asked Alastair Baird, 36, an employee at Disneyland’s exclusive Club 33 who said he was frisked by police officers before being fingerprinted at the jail. “I’m just a waiter, and it felt like a criminal process.”

An attorney for the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees union has asked the Anaheim City Council to rescind the ordinance at its meeting next Tuesday and was joined by other groups in denouncing the ID cards.

“It gives police unbridled discretion to crack down on people they don’t like,” said Dan Tokaji, a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California. “This is not a police state. . . . You don’t have to have an identification card to live, work and enjoy the benefits of freedom in our country.”

Advertisement

Those who do not have the laminated ID cards are guilty of a misdemeanor and could be fined. Some employers have threatened to fire workers who do not have the cards, said union spokesman John Earl.

Police run a warrants check but do not conduct fuller background investigations, Martinez said. The information is not reported to employers or immigration authorities.

“We are very sensitive to the INS issues in this city,” he said. “None of this would ever go to INS. Our chief is very adamant about this. This has nothing to do with citizenship status.”

Baird said the officers who took his mug shot and fingerprints were only doing their jobs but believes the ordinance is “over the top.”

When he told his co-worker, Carolyn Pelcak, about the application process, she reported it to union officials.

Other establishments in Anaheim said the police have visited them about the ID cards in recent years. Employees at Linbrook Bowl said police cracked down on them in 1998. Though the bowling alley has been open for more than 40 years, managers said they were unaware of the rules until police showed up demanding to see ID cards.

Advertisement

When the employees could not produce them, police gave them citations. The bowling alley’s bar was also shut down for the night, manager John Haveles said. Since then, the ID cards have become a condition of employment.

“We don’t agree with it, but we’re complying,” Haveles said.

Francesca Denatale, a bartender at the bowling alley, said she paid a fine of about $75.

“I think its discriminatory that the field I work in has to be subjected to that,” she said.

University of Southern California professor Erwin Chemerinsky, a specialist in constitutional law, said it may be difficult to overturn the ordinance because the government is typically given great latitude in requiring professional licenses.

“I think the legal challenge to some of it will be difficult, but I am very troubled by this because it really is an invasion of privacy,” Chemerinsky said.

*

Times staff writer Stan Allison contributed to this story.

Advertisement