Improving his lies

Why does The Times continue to build articles around the useless opinions of AEG’s Tim Leiweke? He made one outlandish statement after another about spending whatever it takes to bring the Stanley Cup here when Phil Anschutz bought the Kings in 1994, yet the pitiful seasons since then with sub-par players prove his insincerity.

He can continue to claim that bringing David Beckham to the Galaxy was the right move, but the fact that the vast majority of Angelenos still ignore soccer once they graduate from middle school says otherwise.

I understand why Leiweke takes your calls, for a huckster has no choice but to keep making pitches to a rapidly disbelieving fan base. But why continue to grant him a public forum without at least a semblance of accountability?

Ian MacKinney

Westchester