Advertisement
Business

Wells Fargo’s interim CEO may turn permanent as other candidates back away

FILE - In this Dec. 19, 2012, file photo, a man walks past a Wells Fargo branch in Philadelphia. Wel
A man walks past a Wells Fargo bank branch.
(Matt Rourke / Associated Press)
Bloomberg

More than two months into Wells Fargo & Co.’s broad search for its next leader, a pitch to keep the company’s interim chief executive is gaining a bit of steam — thanks in part to the people who don’t want the job.

Several executives widely seen as attractive candidates have indicated they aren’t interested in joining the bank, including some who demurred months ago, according to people with knowledge of the situation. That’s removing some external options at the same time C. Allen Parker, the general counsel who took temporary control of the fourth-largest U.S. bank this year, is signaling willingness and even interest in staying on, people with familiar with his position said.

Yet an attempt to keep Parker — whose candidacy has been championed for weeks by the company’s senior executives — would risk resistance from regulators or a backlash from the bank’s critics. When Tim Sloan stepped down as CEO in March amid frustration over his efforts to address scandals, board Chairwoman Betsy Duke vowed to find an outsider to “complete the transformation.” Parker’s backers argue that he’s better than an outsider, having joined the company only two years ago but knowledgeable about its many scandals.

“There is a reason why the bank was looking outside.… They thought, among other reasons, that that would go over better with people in Washington,” said Ian Katz, a financial public policy analyst at Capital Alpha Partners in Washington. “If they go with Parker or any internal candidate, they’re going to take some heat for it.”

Advertisement

One regulator telegraphed its position on the debate Wednesday.

“We are aware that the Wells Fargo board has stated it is seeking external candidates to fill the CEO position, and we support that criteria,” a spokesman for the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which has committed to reviewing Wells Fargo’s selection, said in an emailed statement.

Wells Fargo’s directors have yet to publicly indicate which way they’re leaning. Complicating their decision is a narrowing field of potential candidates, with some saying they are not interested in coming out of retirement or are committed to current jobs. Some earn more running divisions at rival lenders than what Wells Fargo typically pays its leader. And a few would have to give up tens of millions of dollars in deferred pay from their current employers to join a competitor — money that Wells Fargo may not be able to replace without risking a public-relations firestorm.

PNC Financial Services Inc. CEO Bill Demchak has said publicly that he doesn’t want the job. Former U.S. Bancorp CEO Richard K. Davis, who now runs the charity Make-a-Wish America, also passed on the opportunity, according to a person briefed on the matter.

Advertisement

Critics seized on the rebuffs as reason for broader reform.

“The fact Wells Fargo has to beg suitors to take an $18-million paycheck and still gets rejected tells you everything you need to know,” Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, said in an emailed statement. “Even Wall Street insiders can see that Wells Fargo is too big to manage, and no CEO can fix it.”

Wells Fargo’s recruiters are looking beyond the nation’s largest banks for candidates. Sanjiv Das, CEO of mortgage company Caliber Home Loans Inc., is among members of the broader field, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. And the Wall Street Journal reported last month that Wells Fargo representatives contacted Eileen Murray, co-CEO of hedge fund Bridgewater Associates.

And then there are the disparate opinions among authorities, investors and insiders over how far Wells Fargo must still go to refresh its leadership after a series of shake-ups in recent years. The CEO succession process has already received criticism from banking peers including JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s Jamie Dimon and Citizens Financial Group Inc.’s Bruce Van Saun.

“Placing somebody from U.S. Bancorp, PNC, Citigroup or JPMorgan just means it’s going to be more of the same,” said Eduardo Rabassa, a managing partner at Boyden Executive Search focused on financial services. “If Wells wants to be consistent with the campaign that they reestablished the bank in 2018, they need somebody completely different.”

Major shareholders, including Berkshire Hathaway Inc. CEO Warren Buffett, have said they were satisfied with Sloan and the progress he was making on cleaning up the bank before his abrupt retirement. Investors now want the board to quickly find a long-term successor who can both appease regulators and grow the business.

“It would be difficult for any investor to consider a significant investment in the stock when you don’t know who the CEO is,” Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Alison Williams said. And Parker is already up to speed on investigations of the lender.

“Parker seems like he is definitely the right man for right now, but the question is: Will he be the right person to steer the bank strategically long term?” Williams said. “Can he strategically run and grow this bank?”

Advertisement

The risk is that walking back a commitment to recruit an outsider wouldn’t sit well with prominent critics, such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who is running for president. For years, she and others called on the bank to name an untainted leader to fire wrongdoers. Her office declined to comment on whether she might object to Parker remaining CEO.

Parker was in charge of handling Wells Fargo’s legal matters during a period when the bank’s cleanup was deemed too slow. So the risk is that authorities might view him as part of those issues, not the solution to them.

Late last month, Parker publicly heaped praise on regulators at an investing conference — and touted his work with them.

“They are highly professional, they take their jobs very seriously, and we take their feedback seriously,” he said. “What I found is that we have a new phase of constructive dialogue with them that’s been very helpful to me, and I hope it’s going to be productive in terms of reaching our goals of getting the past issues behind us.”


Newsletter
Get our weekly California Inc. newsletter
Advertisement