Walk through the current exhibit at the Architecture + Design Museum in downtown Los Angeles and you will find some wild visions of a future L.A.
A concept design by wHY Architecture proposes a pair of slim, sci-fi structures that would occupy two lanes of Wilshire, complete with elevated parks and swimming pools. Across the room, a cluster of powder-blue models by Lorcan O’Herlihy Architects imagines homes that can capture and purify rainwater — one with a giant sponge, another with a bulbous architectural bladder. There are futuristic towers, Queen Anne houses that have had their guts rearranged and a block’s worth of granny flats reconfigured into a single, efficient belt.
Architects show a range of ideas for the future L.A. at the A+D Museum’s exhibition ‘Shelter.’ Kulapat Yantrasast and the team at wHY Architecture presented a concept called ‘Unfolding Wilshire,' in which they added ribbons of multi-level structures to the city’s famed thoroughfare.(wHY Architecture / A+D Museum)
wHY Architecture presented its scheme as a circular, rotating sculpture in which everyday objects such as Styrofoam and other bits of detritus were used to represent the city.(Carolina A. Miranda / Los Angeles Times)
As part of their concept project, the firm Bureau Spectacular reimagined popular Southern California designs. From left: the Modernist house with a swimming pool (with nod to David Hockney’s 1967 painting “A Bigger Splash”) and the Queen Anne style home, popular at the turn of the 20th century.(Bureau Spectacular / A+D Museum)
Many of the projects were based on sharing space. LA-Más had an intriguing proposal: getting neighbors to team up to produce more efficiently-designed granny flats in their backyards. By pooling space, they could achieve a higher density, without adding towering structures to the neighborhood.(Carolina A. Miranda / Los Angeles Times)
Lorca O’Herlihy Architects used their project to consider the issue of water in dry Los Angeles. In their proposed designs, homes would be built specifically to store and purify water captured in the form of rain, storm surges and run-off.(Carolina A. Miranda / Los Angeles times)
The O’Herlihy proposal offered various schematics for capturing and retaining water. The concepts are not that far off: Los Angeles is in the midst of thinking about how it might better employ the precious water that travels the course of the L.A. River — much of which gets flushed out to the ocean.(Carolina A. Miranda / Los Angeles Times)
The architects at PAR considered the architecture of the tower — and how it might be connected to mass transit and better integrated with green spaces.(Carolina A. Miranda / Los Angeles Times)
“Shelter: Rethinking How We Live in Los Angeles” looks at the future of housing in L.A. And it does so with some purposely radical designs. (One can only imagine the pandemonium that would erupt among the membership of the Miracle Mile Residential Association if they got a gander at the hyper-contemporary concrete ribbon proposed by Kulapat Yantrasast and the team at wHY for Wilshire.)
But the out-there ideas are for a reason: to get designers, city planners, developers and design-interested citizens thinking about what the L.A. of the not-so-distant future will look like — one in which the single-family home is not the model.
“Los Angeles is facing greater density,” says Sam Lubell, who co-curated the exhibition with Danielle Rago. “It’s facing affordability issues, environmental issues. So the goal is to rethink models of housing in L.A. with some of those questions in mind.”
The bulk of the show is focused on the forward-looking designs of six architectural teams from Los Angeles: wHY, Lorcan O’Herlihy, Bureau Spectacular, Par, MAD and LA-Más.
But one wall is devoted to more than a dozen L.A. designs that have actually been built, projects that employ innovative methods of construction, have higher levels of density, dialog well with the outdoors and achieve all of that with an interesting nod to design. In other words, they show that high density doesn’t have to mean a big, impersonal box.
Over the past couple of weeks, I toured four of these completed projects and spoke with their architects (all of whom are Los Angeles-based). And I hit points east and west: Michael Maltzan’s Star Apartments on Skid Row, Barbara Bestor’s Blackbirds residential development in Echo Park, Lorcan O’Herlihy’s student and faculty apartment complex in Westwood and Kevin Daly Architects' Broadway Housing in Santa Monica.
The goal was to get a sense of what has already been accomplished architecturally in Los Angeles and what we could learn from these projects moving forward — from how to share space to what aspects of the L.A. building code need reconsidering if we’re going to design smartly in the future.
Here are five lessons learned:
1. The homes of the future will have greater density and smaller footprints
“Los Angeles has sprawled for almost all of its history,” Maltzan says. “Every time it was given an opportunity, it pushed the perimeter further and further out. And I think that there’s an argument to be made that the limits of that perimeter have finally be hit — whether for geographic or psychological reasons.”
The projects I visited all treated space with great care. O’Herlihy’s 31-unit Westwood apartment building features two- and three-bedroom apartments that are 800 and 1,000 square feet, respectively.
At Bestor’s Echo Park project, which is comprised of 18 houses in a medium-density development on a hillside, the largest of the bunch is 1,900 square feet — and it harbors a three-bedroom, two-and-a-half bath house. These are a far cry from 10,000-square foot McMansions.
Certainly, the move is about using space more efficiently — fitting more people into the same acreage. But it’s about something else, too.
“We’re used to L.A. as a single-family home with a garden and the garage and the driveway,” says Bestor — but that lifestyle is changing. “Places like Venice have set an excellent precedent. The lots are tiny, but they command as much as a mansion in Bel-Air. Why? You’re buying into lifestyle. You can walk around. You can pop over to the corner store.”
In other words, a comfortable living experience is not always about having the biggest place.
2. Outdoor space will be communal
“It’s all about shared space,” Lubell says of the future L.A. “You don’t get your own outdoor space anymore.”
Every project I visited was centered on or contained a shared outdoor space. Daly’s Santa Monica project — a development of 33 affordable-housing units — is built around a courtyard that is shaded by a decades-old quinine tree. Bestor’s homes are set around a narrow lane that also serves as a gathering space or children’s play area, one that is protected from the street traffic on Vestal Avenue.
At Maltzan’s Star Apartments in downtown Los Angeles, the second story is largely open to the elements and features a vegetable garden, a pickleball court and a rubberized running track.
At O’Herlihy’s Westwood housing — which happens to face the historic Strathmore Apartments, designed by modernist Richard Neutra in the 1930s — various terraces have been cut out of the building to provide an intimate space in which to gather, chill out or study.
Despite the stereotype of the single-family home, this type of shared public space is in Southern California’s architectural veins. Says Bestor: “We can’t ignore the history of the courtyard apartment in Los Angeles.”
3. Thoughtful outdoor space is what sets L.A. architecture apart
In recent years, L.A. has seen a significant amount of high-density building: apartment buildings clustered along La Brea and Wilshire, multifamily developments around downtown, blocky condo developments in Alhambra. The attention to any kind of outdoor space in many of these projects often looks like an afterthought — consisting of a balcony wide enough to accommodate a bicycle or, in some cases, nothing more than a driveway.
In a place like Los Angeles, where good weather is part of the charm, it should not be like this. And the projects on view at A+D remind us that medium- and high-density projects can provide access to interesting and comfortable outdoor areas.
O’Herlihy’s Westwood apartment building — which occupies a sliver of steeply graded land at Strathmore Drive and Levering Avenue — has various terraces cut into the building, thereby providing pleasant open-air gathering areas. (These also have the effect of reducing some of the building’s mass so as not to block Neutra’s historic apartments across the way.)
“I always try to persuade clients that projects will be stronger by integrating outdoor space in a thoughtful way,” O’Herlihy explained as we toured the perimeter of his project. “It can change the dynamics of a building.”
On my visit to Daly’s Broadway Housing in Santa Monica, kids were playing around the grown trees that served as the centerpiece of the design. Some of Bestor’s units had private patios, but the communal lane assures that everyone had access to the outdoors. The roomy second story terrace of Maltzan’s Star Apartments, in the meantime, offers charm and good views amid the grit of downtown.
“As opposed to importing models from more traditional cities, it’s incumbent on us to deal with density on our own terms,” Maltzan says. “And it needs to come from the undercurrent of life and lifestyle here. ... So, finding a way to more inventively create a better balance between high levels of density and generous open space is not just a nice marketing thing. It gets at the very core of how you begin to transform one way of living into another way of living.”
“Los Angeles,” Lubell adds, “doesn’t want to do density the way New York does density."
4. The city needs to make way for innovative building and design
Any builder who has worked on a project in Los Angeles knows that this is a space that is highly regulated — which means that trying anything new oftenis impossible. This was a problem that Maltzan faced during the design and construction of the Star Apartments.
The building’s stacked and staggered apartment units — which give it a kind of Tetris feel — are prefabricated. And these were all laid into place using a crane. There are a lot of reasons to want to build with prefabricated units in Los Angeles: The build time is shorter, and the construction doesn’t require acres of staging areas. Plus, the prefab units often make a much more efficient use of materials than construction done on-site.
“As you work with a manufacturer, you can keep refining the design until they use every single piece of material that comes in,” Maltzan says. “From a sustainability point of view, the prefabrication process is about minimizing construction waste.”
But Los Angeles has no real way for contending with this type of construction. In fact, prefabricated units are considered “products” by the city and therefore require all kinds of onerous and expensive labeling. Maltzan had to work with the regulators to find a way around that.
“Much of the Star Apartments in the beginning,” says the architect, was not about design. "[It] was working with the city of Los Angeles to develop a pathway by which you could more easily build and develop a multifamily construction employing prefabrication.”
In other words, there was a whole lot of negotiation and a whole lot of paperwork.
Los Angeles doesn’t want to do density the way New York does density.
5. Parking requirements are in desperate need of an update
Of all the regulations that guide design and construction, parking is one of the issues that needs to be dealt with most urgently.
Los Angeles has onerous rules about parking. A single-family house has to have two covered parking spaces. A two-family residence requires one-and-a-half covered spaces and half an uncovered space. (You read that right.) Apartment houses need a jigsaw puzzle’s worth of covered and uncovered spaces in wholes and halves. The code is mind-boggling.
“It’s such an anachronism — and so out of date,” Daly says. “Are we really building 400-square-foot structures for cars? That should go to the home or the garden.”
At a time when increasing numbers of young people are using public transit, when the city is in the midst of reconfiguring its street grid to cut car lanes in favor of bus- and bike-ways, the parking requirements are going to have to give.
The team at wHY points this out in a text that is part of its A+D Museum installation: “With most housing development projects, a parking study is the first test of viability,” it reads, “but will we need so much space in the future?”
Perhaps we should look to the affordable-housing model, which doesn’t require as much parking as part of its zoning.
“The modest break on parking makes such a difference from a design perspective,” Daly says. In the case of his Santa Monica project, “it allowed us to add another floor.” It also allowed Broadway Housing to hold onto its fully grown trees, which grow directly into the earth and not some artificial concrete planter. For the residents of the apartments, it’s like having a built-in park.
Bestor says the small-lot ordinance that governed her Echo Park project also offered a break. (Some of the Blackbirds units come with uncovered parking only.) "I didn’t have to be as concerned with the parking, and that allows for more density,” she says.
“Besides,” she adds, “sometimes uncovered parking can be a better use of space since people have to park their cars there. In L.A., most people use their garages as everything except a garage.”
I discuss the show with Frances Anderton of KCRW’s Design and Architecture program. You can listen here.
Find me on Twitter @cmonstah.