Advertisement

San Bernardino council ponders deep budget cuts

A welcome sign on 6th Street greets visitors to San Bernardino. The city recently filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection, making it the third California city to do so this summer.
(Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)
Share

San Bernardino city officials Tuesday night were weighing a dramatic austerity plan for the insolvent city that would close libraries, slash jobs and contract out some services to the private sector.

The plan would shave $22.4 million off the city’s $45.8-million general fund budget deficit — equal to about 30% of the general fund budget. The city filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection last month, making it the third California city to do so this summer.

Interim City Manager Andrea Travis-Miller told the council the city had no choice but to make deep cuts. Officials also warned that as painful as this round of cuts would be, the city will need to slash much more to balance its books.

Advertisement

“We just don’t have sufficient inflows to deal with the operating costs we have to even provide basic services,” Travis-Miller said. “At this point, we are convinced that if we do not begin to make deep cuts to this organization, we really will not have the cash flow to sustain us very much longer.”

The proposed budget plan would eliminate more than 100 jobs, including 41 non-sworn positions in the Police Department and a variety of positions in other departments ranging from managers to janitors.

Twenty positions were slated to be cut from the Fire Department, triggering nine demotions but no layoffs, and 18 sworn police positions were expected to be eliminated through retirements and resignations.

The plan called for consolidating a number of departments and contracting out functions including custodial services and park and tree maintenance to private vendors.

The budget reductions would probably lead to closing three of the four city libraries, as well as possible rotating closures among fire stations.

City officials were hoping for added cuts from union concessions and budget reductions in the council members’ and elected city attorney’s offices; but even with those added savings, the city will face a projected $7.1-million deficit in the current fiscal year. And the city still must address an $18-million deficit from last year and more than $300 million in unfunded liabilities.

Advertisement

Council members Chas Kelley and Wendy McCammack argued that the city should put more effort into looking for revenue-generating plans, including getting more money from leasing out city property for cellphone towers and moving forward with a “public-private partnership” for some of the city’s waste services.

McCammack accused her colleagues of “kicking the revenue can down the road.”

Kelley also offered to substitute a plan of his own for the slate of cuts proposed by the fire chief, leading one of his colleagues to accuse him of pandering to the firefighters union.

“I have a problem with the fire chief bringing us recommendations and then moving forward with a union proposition,” Councilman Rikke Van Johnson said.

Early in the evening, before launching into the budget debate, the council passed an ordinance that will make it a misdemeanor for city staff to use restricted funds to pay general fund bills without approval from the City Council. (At a special meeting last Wednesday, the council did give staff permission to dip into restricted funds to make payroll.)

Many cities borrow from restricted funds to cover occasional cash flow shortages in the general fund; but as San Bernardino faced budget shortfalls in recent years, the general fund had not paid the borrowing back as required, contributing to the ballooning deficit and obscuring the city’s dire financial state.

But late Tuesday, the council had not yet voted on the proposed budget cuts.

City residents had mixed reactions on the proposed slate of cuts.

Milton Clark, president of the city library board, said he understood that cuts were inevitable but felt the libraries were taking more than their fair share.

Advertisement

“It’s going to have a tremendous impact on the communities we serve and a very negative one,” he said.

Others voiced approval for the austerity measures, including Tammy Martin-Ryles, 44, a local business owner and spokeswoman for the citizens watchdog group Save Our San Bernardino.

“We are in support of what they have to do. It’s a hard decision, but hard decisions have to be made under the circumstances,” she said.

A recent spate of bankruptcies in California cities, including Stockton and Mammoth Lakes, raised fears that more would follow and led credit rating agency Moody’s to launch a review of the 93 California cities whose bonds the agency rates, with the potential for mass rating downgrades.

abby.sewell@latimes.com

Advertisement