Possible Stockton bankruptcy sets up employee pensions battle
The city of Stockton’s impending bankruptcy case sets up a battle over employee pensions.
A federal judge ruled Monday that Stockton was eligible for bankruptcy protection, rebutting Wall Street creditors who claimed the city was not.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Klein found that Stockton can move forward with a plan to reorganize its debt. The city’s creditors, he said, had acted in bad faith by refusing to negotiate.
“The creditors got a big black eye today,” said Karol Denniston, an attorney who helped draft the legislation that guided Stockton’s mandated mediation before filing for Chapter 9 protection. “Now the stage is set for the real dogfight.”
In late June, the port city of 300,000 became the largest U.S. city to fail financially. At that time, Stockton stopped bond payments, slashed employee healthcare benefits and made further cuts to a strapped budget that already had forced the police department in California’s second-most-violent city to shrink by 25%.
During a three-day hearing that ended last week, Stockton officials testified that creditors had walked away from the table and refused to pay their share of negotiation fees because the city did not include cutting payments to the state’s employee pension plan, CalPERS, in its reorganization plan.
The $900 million that Stockton owes to the California Public Employees Retirement System to cover pensions is its biggest debt, as is the case with many cities in California.
Assured Guaranty, one of Stockton’s major creditors, issued a statement Monday disagreeing with the judge’s decision.
The company, which according to its website guarantees “scheduled principal and interest payments when due on municipal, public infrastructure and structured financings,” stressed that it had a “substantial interest in seeing the city emerge from its financial predicament as a viable and sustainable governmental enterprise for the long term.”
Klein left the door open for Stockton’s CalPERS obligations to be negotiated in the next phase of the case.
The key question will be whether federal bankruptcy law trumps California’s requirement that CalPERS be funded. Until now, there has not been a major test of the conflict.
“There are very complex and difficult questions of law that I can see out there on the horizon,” Klein said.
Stockton bankruptcy clears way for CalPERS pension fight
Cesar Chavez Google doodle flap: Conservatives fight back
Fontana police dog allegedly thrown out of window by parolee
The stories shaping California
Get up to speed with our Essential California newsletter, sent six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.