Editorial: It’s unacceptable to delay the Exide cleanup when public health is at stake

Exide baby
Boyle Heights resident Veta Gashgai, 40, holding 1-month-old son Rogelio Solis, at an anti-Exide press conference on the steps of Board of Supervisors Meeting Room in November 2014.
(Los Angeles Times)

Earlier this month, state officials revealed that they had found nearly 250 spots on 203 properties near the former Exide battery recycling plant where levels of brain-damaging lead were more than 10 times higher than California’s health standard and at concentrations that were high enough to be considered “hazardous waste” under the law. Another 2,200 spots had  concentrations that would make it unsafe for children to play in the yard.

That’s scary news. Yet the residents living in these dangerous conditions amid high levels of a potent neurotoxin will have to wait a year or more to have their property cleaned up. That’s one more year that parents will have to keep their kids away from the soil because even small amounts of lead can cause permanent brain damage in young children, leading to lifelong learning disabilities and behavioral problems. It’s one more year of extreme caution to make sure shoes, toys and pets don’t carry contaminated dirt into the house. One more year of fear that, despite their best efforts, their children’s futures could be irreparably harmed because regulators allowed the Exide plant to spew lead and other pollutants into the air for decades. 

And why must these residents wait another year? Because state officials have decided to postpone cleaning even the most highly contaminated, high-risk properties until a lengthy environmental impact report has been completed. That will be next May, at the earliest. This is hardly the aggressive cleanup residents expected when Gov. Jerry Brown and the legislature approved $176.6 million in emergency funding in April. Also worrisome is that state officials have released only broad sampling results, so it’s impossible to know where the highest levels of contamination have been found or how many homes will eventually require cleaning.

It may be tempting to vilify the Department of Toxic Substances Control, the state agency responsible for overseeing the cleanup. This is the department, after all, that allowed Exide to operate with only a temporary permit and outdated air pollution controls for 30 years, despite repeated air-quality and hazardous-waste violations. The plant may have contaminated as many as 10,000 homes within an area of 1.7 miles. But under new leadership and the scrutiny of state lawmakers, the DTSC is now attempting one of the largest cleanups of its kind in California. It’s also trying to balance the need for immediate action with an insistence on careful, lawful action. 


When Brown announced his emergency funding plan in February, he proposed exempting the cleanup from the California Environmental Quality Act, which would have allowed state officials to skip the lengthy environmental impact report process before removing lead-laced soil from all homes. But community and environmental groups balked at the exemption. After decades of lax regulation and disregard for residents’ health, the community didn’t trust the DTSC to manage the massive cleanup in the safest way possible. CEQA would ensure that residents had input and that the process would be transparent. Their concern was understandable, and Brown dropped his proposed CEQA exemption.

The result, however, is that DTSC officials say they can’t clean up the vast majority of the properties until the environmental impact report is complete in May – and that’s assuming there are no delays or challenges. But that timeline ignores the tremendous public health risk that some families face right now.

DTSC officials recognize that — to a degree. The agency has completed emergency cleanups at three houses — without going through the CEQA process — in each case because a child tested positive for elevated lead in his or her blood.  But why wait on the other properties until after a child is poisoned by lead? Why not prevent poisoning by treating highly-contaminated, high-risk properties as the emergency situations they are?

DTSC officials say they are trying to do the right thing — including urging parents to get their children tested for lead poisoning and telling residents how to reduce their exposure — while the agency develops a comprehensive cleanup plan and EIR.  But the drawn-out statutory timelines of CEQA should not be a reason for delay. Officials cannot lose focus on their first and greatest priority: protecting public health.


Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion and Facebook

Get our weekly Opinion newsletter