Kinsley: Playing the Mormon card
Mitt Romney planned to run for president as a successful businessman who would bring some hard-headed common sense and business smarts to the job of running the badly dysfunctional federal government.
FOR THE RECORD:
Kennedy: Michael Kinsley’s July 19 column about Mitt Romney’s Mormon faith mentioned a speech about religion that John F. Kennedy made in Texas in 1960. Kennedy spoke to a group of ministers in Houston, not Dallas.
Like John Kerry in 2004, Romney must now be puzzled about how what he thought was his strongest asset (in Kerry’s case, his honorable service in Vietnam; in Romney’s, his successful business career) could have morphed into a liability. The answer in part is skilled demagoguery from the other side (yes, I mean you, Mr. President) and in part is deserved punishment for overplaying your hand (military experience in Kerry’s case, transferable business skills in Romney’s).
It’s becoming clear that Romney can’t run exclusively as a business genius, and that means he has another problem that otherwise might have gone away: People just don’t like him. If voters had confidence he could restore the economy and America’s place in the world, they wouldn’t care. But if they doubt he can guarantee delivery on that, then his apparent inability to connect with people on an emotional level becomes much more important.
People close to Romney swear that he’s both a good person and a great guy. So what’s his problem? Is he too handsome? Does he look too much like a president ever to be elected president? Has he spent too many years in the high-finance cocoon to know how to talk with people outside it? I don’t know. But whatever the cause, I have the solution. Romney had it in his hands, and he threw it away.
In 2007, trying to clear away the underbrush for his 2008 presidential bid, Romney gave a closely watched speech he called “Faith in America,” about being a Mormon and running for president. He consciously followed the lead ofJohn F. Kennedyin his famous speech to the ministers of Dallas in 1960 about being a Catholic aspiring to the highest office.
Like Kennedy, he argued that politics and religion were separate spheres. He pledged to be president of all the people, not just his co-religionists. He said, as Kennedy did, that if an irreconcilable conflict arose between his core religious beliefs and his obligations as president, he would resign before betraying either. And he said that for a presidential candidate to go into any details about his faith — to “describe and explain his church’s distinctive doctrines” to the media and
public — would violate the spirit of the constitutional separation of church and state. In other words: My Mormonism is private, and has no relevance to the presidential campaign or the presidency.
That may have been good enough for 1960, but not for 2012, when the deepest reaches of any candidate’s psyche are considered fair game for commentary and analysis. Mormons believe some pretty wacky things, but then so do Jews, and Muslims and more mainstream Christians. Furthermore, Romney is a much more devout Mormon than Kennedy was a Catholic.
The important point is that Romney may be a fool even to want to bottle up his faith and pack it away for the duration because it could be the best thing about him. It certainly humanizes him, which he needs.
This occurred to me while reading Walter Kirn’s wonderful essay in the current New Republic about growing up Mormon. Even though he has long since left the church, and never came close to observing all its precepts, Kirn admires Mormonism as “our country’s longest experiment with communitarian idealism, promoting an ethic of frontier-era burden-sharing that has been lost in contemporary America, with increasingly dire social consequences.”
Kirn offers several examples of extraordinary kindnesses the Mormon Church and its members have done, in the spirit of community, for his own family and for him. The article certainly opened my eyes, and Romney is not just a member but a leader of this organization. He shouldn’t be pushing his Mormonism into a corner and hoping people will forget about it. He should be making it a central part of his campaign. It’s far and away the best thing I know about him.
At the moment, all that most people know about Romney the man is that once in high school he led a gang that bullied a gay student, and that his wife has multiple sclerosis. And they’re turned off by his apparent lack of any inner life. But maybe he does have an inner life after all. Why in the world would he try to hide it?
Michael Kinsley, a former editorial page editor of The Times, is a Bloomberg View columnist.
A cure for the common opinion
Get thought-provoking perspectives with our weekly newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.