To the editor: In her critique of feminist writer and activist Gloria Steinem and former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, both of whom expressed dismay that many young woman support Bernie Sanders for president, Robin Abcarian may be sending a confused message. (“Gloria Steinem and Madeleine Albright: You are not helping Hillary Clinton,” Feb. 8)
One keeps hearing the narrative that young women know little about Hillary Clinton because she and whatever she did were before their time. Does Abcarian believe they know Steinem, age 81, or Albright, 78? Well, ignorance is not an excuse. Why not read and learn about the struggle for equality in the “olden days” and the women who fought to make life better for our gender?
Like all politicians, Clinton is not perfect, but she is incredibly qualified and has paid her dues to become president. Sanders is indeed idealistic, but he is promising much more than he can deliver. And I think he knows it.
Elizabeth M. Foster, Pasadena
To the editor: Brava to Abcarian for her thoughtful take on the recent comments by Steinem and Albright. Take a look at the women who head other nations, some of whom have failed miserably, and ask yourself if gender alone is a logical reason to choose Clinton.
Steinem’s comments about women wanting to get dates by supporting Sanders is just one more reason the word “feminist” has had a nasty connotation for so many people. It’s always been their way or the highway, and heaven forbid a woman or girl has male friends.
Diane Ohanian, San Diego
To the editor: Albright, who said “there’s a special place in hell for women who don’t help each other,” put the philosophy of politics front and center: Do whatever it takes to win. She tried to intimidate women into voting for Clinton.
I suggest there is an even greater place in heaven for those who vote based on character, ethics and integrity instead of playing politics.