End of COVID funds? House eyes $15.6-billion plan, but outlook is dim
This could be the end of the line for congressional funding to fight COVID-19.
What started a month ago as a $30-billion request from the White House to prepare for the next phase of the pandemic has been slashed, reduced and fallen apart on Capitol Hill.
The end result Wednesday was a $15.6-billion package prepared by House Democrats that has almost no chance of passing in the evenly divided Senate, where Republicans have indicated they are unwilling to provide more money without cuts elsewhere or a full accounting from the Biden administration of already-approved virus funding.
That means it’s highly likely no new federal money will be readily approved to fight COVID-19 as the pandemic moves to what many officials are now calling the endemic stage.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) called the turn of events “heartbreaking.”
The idea had been to add President Biden’s request for new virus aid to the massive $1.5-trillion spending bill, a must-pass measure needed by week’s end to keep the federal government operating through the end of the fiscal year.
Biden’s initial $30-billion request was reduced to $22 billion when the administration submitted it to Congress, as the White House warned the U.S. will soon begin to run out of money to bolster COVID-19 testing supplies and to guarantee that uninsured Americans keep getting free treatment for the virus.
White House announced a ‘test to treat’ initiative, in which Americans can get tested at and receive treatment from participating pharmacies, clinics and centers for free. It’s part of a broader plan to move the country towards normalcy.
But as Democrats and Republicans negotiated on Capitol Hill, the final COVID funding package was slashed further to $15.6 billion as part of the broader budget deal. Most of the money would have gone to increasing U.S. supplies of vaccines, treatments and tests and battling the disease around the world.
Pelosi’s compromise backfired as rank-and-final Democrats revolted Wednesday over the final product.
A White House official said late Wednesday that without COVID-19 resources, the situation will be “dire” for the American people. The official was granted anonymity to discuss the situation.
As part of the deal, Republicans insisted that the $15.6-billion COVID-19 aid package be fully paid for, offset by repurposing untapped virus aid that has been promised to the states. Dozens of Democrats counting on that money indicated their opposition to what was seen as an unfair swap.
“To turn around and now say we’re taking hundreds of billions of dollars back in the name of bipartisanship is just unbelievable,” said Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.).
Bush was among several Democratic lawmakers who said their states had already planned to use the money for healthcare, child care, schools and other essentials during the coronavirus crisis. Bush said she would “vehemently oppose efforts to snatch back the lifesaving resources we need to fully and equitably recover from this pandemic.”
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said it is developing guidance that will ease the mask mandate for public transit next month.
Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) said in an interview that her state would have lost nearly $600 million in pandemic assistance that it was entitled to. “My job is to fight for the people of Michigan,” she said.
Pelosi had no choice but to abandon the plan. Instead, the Democratic leader pushed forward a standalone COVID-19 bill that doesn’t rely on the offsetting funds, a strategy that ensures more party support but is certain to lose Republican backing. A planned Wednesday vote was postponed until next week.
If approved, the package would face an uncertain outcome in the the Senate, where Republicans have made it clear they are unlikely to back any new pandemic aid unless the previously approved funds are spent.
“It is not yet clear why additional funding is needed,” Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) wrote in a letter signed by 35 other Republican senators.
The senators said they wanted “a full accounting” of how some $6 trillion in government pandemic funds has been spent.
The House approved the assistance for Ukraine as part of a $1.5-trillion government spending bill.
The White House official said failing to act now on COVID-19 funding will have “severe consequences” for the American people.
In March, COVID-19 testing capacity would decline; in April, the fund that offers coverage for testing and treatments for tens of millions of Americans who lack health insurance would run out of money; and in May, America’s supply of monoclonal antibodies will run out, the official said.
Congress approved the $1.9-trillion American Rescue Plan nearly a year ago, but the administration says the federal government has nearly used up the money dedicated directly to COVID-19 response. More money from Congress is urgently needed to fund antibody treatments, preventative therapy for people who are immunocompromised and community testing sites, officials say.
Associated Press reporters Zeke Miller and Alan Fram contributed to this report.
More to Read
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
