Pakistan handles Islamic extremism with kid gloves
Loud and combative, Fauzia Wahab is unafraid to denounce mullahs or defend deeply unpopular America. In recent weeks, however, the liberal lawmaker has sat hunkered down in her home in Karachi, rarely stepping out her front door.
Islamic militants elsewhere in Pakistan have assassinated a Cabinet minister and a prominent governor since the first of the year. But the Taliban and other violent extremist organizations aren’t the only cause for concern.
The killings of Minority Affairs Minister Shahbaz Bhatti this month and Punjab Gov. Salman Taseer on Jan. 4 have exposed just how deep extremism has seeped into Pakistani society.
When Taseer’s assassin, a 26-year-old police commando, made his first court appearance, lawyers in their traditional black suits and black ties greeted him with kisses and a cascade of rose petals.
A weak and corrupt government, led by the secular Pakistan People’s Party, or PPP, has proved powerless. Even as it has launched military offensives against the Taliban in several areas, it has sought to appease militants in everyday society. And it has barely tried to stem the tide of radicalization in universities, the news media, security forces, political parties and even the legal community.
The military and intelligence communities also have the power to intervene. But both have ties to Islamic militants that go back decades.
“I have been advised by everyone to go home, to go into hibernation,” Wahab, a ruling party member, said during a telephone interview from her home. “What else can I do? Am I supposed to come out on the road and say, ‘Come on and kill me?’ They are roaming around, and our lives are under threat.”
The country’s leaders have conspicuously steered clear of the issue that cost Taseer and Bhatti their lives: a blasphemy law that makes it a crime to insult the prophet Muhammad, the Koran or Islam. Human rights advocates say the law is frequently used to settle scores or persecute minorities, particularly Christians. Those found guilty may face the death penalty.
Both Taseer and Bhatti, a Christian, spoke out against the law. But after Taseer’s assassination, leaders of the ruling party dropped any talk of revising the law; instead they vowed to not tamper with it.
Extremists were unconvinced and responded with a steady stream of death threats. Sherry Rehman, a leading PPP lawmaker who had proposed amendments to the law, received a spate of them. She has pulled back the amendments and, like Wahab, sits holed up in her Karachi home.
Although Wahab hasn’t spoken out about the blasphemy issue, she received threats after saying CIA contractor Raymond Davis, who is accused of murdering two Pakistani men in January, has diplomatic immunity and should be released. Wahab has also accused Pakistan’s judiciary of being soft on militants.
Ayaz Amir, a journalist and lawmaker with the main opposition PML-N party, said the killings of the two politicians “have reduced the space for rational talk; people are afraid right now.”
“In private, politicians will talk about these things, but on the floor of parliament, on talk shows and in the press, they prefer to keep quiet,” Amir said. “This encourages an atmosphere of intolerance to spread.”
No institution appears immune. At the prestigious University of the Punjab, a radical group has clamped down on anything it deems un-Islamic, be it music classes or male and female students being seen together. When a professor had several of the group’s students expelled for violent behavior last year, other members severely beat him with rods and sticks.
Even the upper chamber of parliament, the Senate, has been affected. After Taseer was assassinated, a move to offer a traditional memorial prayer was rejected, which observers said reflected the raw emotions caused by differences over the blasphemy law.
Meanwhile, extremist groups have been emboldened.
At a rally last month called by Jamaat-ud-Dawa, a group regarded in the West as a front for the banned militant organization Lashkar-e-Taiba, more than 20,000 Pakistanis jammed a highway in the eastern city of Lahore to hear Islamist leaders urge the government to establish a ministry for jihad, or holy war. India and the West have accused Lashkar-e-Taiba of masterminding the terrorist attacks in Mumbai in 2008 that killed more than 160 people.
“I can assure you that the funding for this ministry will be given by [Jamaat-ud-Dawa], and we will present a million trained sons of ours for this purpose,” the group’s political affairs chief, Hafiz Abdul Rehman Makki, told the crowd. “Give these million warriors of God AK-47s!”
Analysts say radical groups can attract large numbers because the government, hopelessly mired in corruption and inefficiency, doesn’t provide the unemployed, discouraged masses with much of an alternative.
A third of the population lives below the poverty line. Nearly 7 million children between the ages of 5 and 9 do not attend school, and two of three youths of secondary school age stay at home. Almost half of the population is illiterate.
“There’s only one way to turn this around,” said Najam Sethi, the former editor of the Daily Times, a liberal-leaning newspaper published by Taseer. “Show that liberal democracy delivers: delivers governance, delivers transparency, delivers the nation into the global economy, delivers jobs, delivers livelihoods and fills up empty stomachs.”
“You’ve got to give people all that to make them turn away from the emptiness of ideology and outrage and passion,” Sethi said. “But what has happened is that democracy has not delivered.”
Sethi blamed former military ruler Gen. Zia ul-Haq for encouraging the growth of political Islam in the 1970s and ‘80s. It was Zia who first imposed a blasphemy law to help win the backing of hard-line religious parties.
The influence of extremists could also be reined in if the military and intelligence communities intervened. But bonds between the Islamists and the generals are resilient and time-tested, dating to the period when the CIA and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence directorate teamed up to help fighters in Afghanistan.
Although recent military offensives in places such as Swat Valley and South Waziristan have attained some success against the Pakistani Taliban, elements of the intelligence community continue to nurture ties with militant leaders.
Some militants are regarded as “strategic assets,” said a senior intelligence official who requested anonymity because he is not authorized to speak on such matters.
“Putting these people in prison is a sort of control mechanism,” the official said. “Though they are still able to run their organizations effectively from prison, it’s a bit of a cooling-down period for them, a time to hibernate.”
Wahab says there was a moment when leading politicians could have rallied behind Rehman’s legislation, which would have removed the death penalty and required prosecutors to prove that the alleged blasphemy was intentional.
“But within no time everyone disowned her or kept quiet,” she said. For now, Wahab is in no position to lead the countercharge.
“Most likely I’ll be working from my home,” she said, sighing. “I’ll have to be very careful about my movement.”
Special correspondent Aoun Sahi in Lahore contributed to this report.
Must-read stories from the L.A. Times
Get the day's top news with our Today's Headlines newsletter, sent every weekday morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.