Op-Ed
Meghan Daum: Breaking comedy's raunch barrier
'Bridesmaids' upends the notion that women are only funny in certain roles.
FOR THE RECORD:
Funny girls: In Meghan Daum's May 19 column about comedy and women, Amy Heckerling was identified as the director of "Mean Girls." Mark Waters directed "Mean Girls"; Heckerling directed "Clueless."
Billed in its tagline as evidence that "chick flicks don't have to suck," "Bridesmaids" is being seen as a watershed, a final blow to the notion that women in Hollywood comedies have two choices: the predictable, bland heroines endemic to romantic comedies or the improbably hot love interests of Apatow-style schlubs.
This logic has largely been based on the theory that women will see movies about men (no matter how drunk, crude, clueless or otherwise unappealing) but that men would rather subject themselves to a Brazilian wax (memo to Apatow: How about "Brazilian Wax," a buddy comedy set in Rio, where five guys looking for fun get more than they bargained for?) than sit through two hours of big-screen female funny business. The spin on "Bridesmaids," however, is that men will like it as much as women, and come to it in the same droves that turned films such as "The Hangover" and "The 40-Year-Old Virgin" into blockbusters.
That remains to be seen, of course. Only a smattering of men braved the showing of "Bridesmaids" that I attended, almost all of them in the company of a woman. If the film's promise of crossover appeal holds true, those men will presumably report back to other men that there's enough gross-out humor and scatological set pieces in the film to offset all that estrogen. They may also mention that the film's gamine star and co-writer, Kristen Wiig, exposes so much leg that she often appears to have forgotten to put on pants. That might offset the appearance of the '90s pop trio Wilson Phillips.
It's hard to come by a serious discussion of "Bridesmaids" that doesn't invoke Christopher Hitchens' infamous 2007 Vanity Fair rant, "Why Women Aren't Funny." Working with the thesis that men have a biological imperative to make women laugh, whereas women — thanks mostly to the gravity of their reproductive duties — are imbued with sacredness and seriousness that are antithetical to the very nature of humor (also, if they look pretty, they don't have to speak), Hitchens seems to regard comedy as a poor cousin to more respectable genres like drama (and in this case motherhood). Besides, he wrote, filth is connected to 50 percent of what composes humor. And the "fair sex" doesn't go for it.
"Bridesmaids" literally vomits all over that. It skips most girl-movie cliches (the shopping scenes; the lip-syncing to Aretha Franklin using a hairbrush as a microphone) and jumps headlong into boy-movie cliches. The result is not only critical acclaim but sociopolitical props. It's suddenly "irrefutable," says the New York Times, that "women can go aggressive laugh to aggressive-and-absurd laugh with men." Slate suggested that Hitchens' "perennially circulated head scratcher" has been definitively answered with "a whoopee cushion fart."
Does that imply that the whoopee cushion, as the basest form of humor, is also the purest form of it? The anointing of "Bridesmaids" as a breakthrough suggests as much. After all, despite the hype, it's not the first time we've seen women writing and acting in funny, atypical chick flicks. (Amy Heckerling's "Mean Girls," Lisa Cholodenko's "The Kids Are All Right" and the films of Nicole Holofcener come to mind.) It is, however, the first time we've seen women writing and acting like men in funny movies (and, even then, only a certain subgenre of men; we're not talking Michael Palin or Chris Rock). The fact that it's being touted as a yardstick for measuring a comedian's skills — "If she can do a fart joke, she can do anything!" — suggests that the problem all along hasn't been who is considered funny but what is considered funny.
So listen up, aspiring comedy stars, if you want to make it in Hollywood, it's not enough to deliver the jokes. You need the whoopee cushion too.
mdaum@latimescolumnists.com
Comments (6)
Add / View comments | Discussion FAQRidiculous article... never mind that the movie was awful... lol.. what a step for women!
When I was very young I saw this on a bathroom wall: Mrs. Thatcher drinks like a man. Response: No, dear, Mrs. Thatcher drinks like a good woman.
I don't remember what inspired the comments but I do remember that I thought: being a woman is as good as being a man, possibly better. I come from a culture that always allowed women to chose their path in life recognizing that both sexes can do all they want but only women give birth to children. That is, it worked until white Christian settlers' genocide changed it.
Daum is clearly neither of my culture, nor my generation. Bridesmaids, for me, show clearly that women succumbed to what men allow as understandable humor to share with women: bodily functions. It’s based on the old German adage: women are only good for Kids, Kitchen and Church as they have no intellect. Kipling wrote that men's sense of shame is complicated, varied and complex while women's exist for one thing only (sex). Other than sex, women had no sense or sensibility.
Bridesmaids sadly show that as far as acceptance and understanding of female intellectual complexity, we are still where Kipling was. As far as sharing the complexity of men's life, we still are there as well- serving as breeding mares, cooks and prostitutes too stupid to share into the real men intellectual life.
Evidently progress has stopped. And as film? Predictible and boring.
What a step forward for womanhood! No more concern with has-been issues like abortion, job discrimination, or sexual assult, now the modern woman can tell d**k and s**t jokes just like the big boys! On the big screen too, and they can also appeal to the junior high male demographic, now that's progress.
Yon've come a long f**kin' way baby!




Letters »