Editorial

The Google library

Google's goal of creating a giant literary database may not fit the traditional model of free public libraries.
November 10, 2008

» Discuss Article    (3 Comments)

Google, whose corporate ambition is "to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful," has reached a breakthrough agreement with book publishers to make millions of out-of-print volumes accessible to the public. Unfortunately, it's not clear how useful the pact will be to libraries and their patrons. That's because the deal promotes a "pay to read" approach that's the antithesis of the free public library model.
FOR THE RECORD:
Google: An editorial Monday about a new Google settlement with authors and publishers incorrectly stated that the deal would make digitized out-of-print books available to public libraries only as in short previews. Under the agreement, patrons would be able to read the full texts of the books on a library computer. Previews also would be available through the libraries' Internet sites. —



The deal grew out of a lawsuit that authors and publishers filed in response to a Google initiative to scan the collections of five major university libraries into a giant electronic database. The ostensible purpose of the database was to extend Google's search capabilities to the contents of some of the country's biggest libraries, providing what amounted to a card catalog for the 21st century. But Google had another goal as well: to give public libraries of all shapes and sizes access to rich digital collections of works, most of which were out of print.

In a settlement announced late last month, Google, the American Assn. of Publishers and the Authors Guild agreed to give publishers more control over what went into the database and how its contents were viewed. Google could make digital copies of entire works available to public and university libraries, but with limits. Significantly, public libraries would have free access only to previews of the digitized books, and only on one computer terminal per library building. Patrons can use Google's service to try to find a copy of a book at a nearby library, but if they want a digital copy, they'll have to pay for it. And even then, they won't be able to download the copy to their laptop or portable device; they can either print it or read it from the website where it will be stored. The Web-only approach requires better wireless Internet access than most people have today. Libraries that want to let users read copies for free will have to pay a subscription fee to a new "book rights registry" run by authors and publishers.

Proponents of the deal say it's just the starting point, and that Google and the registry will have the flexibility to explore more business models. The initiative will give publishers important new insights into how people want to use their works online and how digital technology is transforming the book market, they say. Nevertheless, some libraries are worried about a shift toward charging readers each time they take a book out of the digital stacks. It's unfortunate that Google and the publishers didn't take advantage of the emerging standards in the electronic book field to enable libraries to acquire and circulate digital versions of out-of-print titles. Companies such as Overdrive are providing a model for e-book lending that preserves the spirit of free public libraries. Google and the publishers should look for ways to apply that model to their new effort, helping libraries keep pace with a reading public that's increasingly eager and equipped for a world with less paper.




Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Comments will be accepted throughout the day.
 
1. May I suggest that a far better way would be a change in copyright law..if a book is out of print, or a recording not for sale, or software not supported for a period of say three years, the copyright should be voided for companies and corporations after which electronic copies should be stored in an online equivalent of the Library of Congress (Google ould bid to run it) with a fee of say ten cents to access - if need be by buying an advance "book of tickets" - with the creator to receive at least three quarters of this.
Submitted by: John Sutton
8:38 AM PST, Nov 11, 2008
 
2. Hooray! The LA Times addresses Google! Why it's about time too. I mean with all of the real issues that you fine "journalists" ignore, you decide to take on the e-library. I feel so informed.
Submitted by: greg
11:18 PM PST, Nov 10, 2008
 
3. I have posted to the internet a collection of combination webliographies and bibliographies about the various components of the Google Library such as Google Books, Google Government, Google Scholar, Google News and more and links to these bibliographic sources may be found in the Meet the Google box of my General Internet & Print Resources subject guide found on the guides dot temple dot edu home of our libraries subject guides. David Dillard Temple University
Submitted by: David P Dillard
10:35 AM PST, Nov 10, 2008
 





The author talks about his youth in an orphanage, his latest book on the story of California, and the state's current budget mess.

   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
In today's pages: How the budget got this bad. Oh, yes, and Jacko, of course
An international accord on global warming? The editorial board celebrates,...
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
SuperFan, taking affinities further
Social networks are partly about broadcasting information to a far-flung...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT